!!!ПЕРЕЕЗД!!! новый канал новый канал новый канал
💘5🥰1

Channel
@momless33
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
119subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001866040363 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @momless33 |
| Description | дальше бога нет щп: https://t.me/momless35 нсфв архив: https://t.me/+sZjfjEahBNNjMTcy буст: https://t.me/boost/momless34 лсик: @kakkakatzhest |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/momless33 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 119 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 119 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 14 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
156 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 48 | 30.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 23 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5280652948878144459 | 18 | 11.5% | |
| 🎉 | 17 | 10.9% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5460650441228443926 | 11 | 7.05% | |
| custom 5348260858013173776 | 10 | 6.41% | |
| 😨 | 5 | 3.21% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 3.21% | |
| 🖕 | 4 | 2.56% | |
| custom 5348126030399816518 | 1 | 0.641% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.641% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.641% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2025 to 22 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
!!!ПЕРЕЕЗД!!! новый канал новый канал новый канал
💘5🥰1
новый тгк новый тгк новый тгк
💘5
!!!ПЕРЕЕЗД!!! новый канал новый канал новый канал
💘7
Channel name was changed to «[АРХИВ] Momless34 pozorishche🫐»
ЭТО НЕ УЧЕБНАЯ ТРЕВОГА !!!ПЕРЕЕЗД!!! новый канал новый канал новый канал
🙏5💘1
щас как заебашу переезд на другой канал, ахуеете
🥰11😨5💘2🎉1
дроп скетчей, чтобы канал не простаивал 1. эбебе клянусь, я это закончу (я ахуею) 2-3. пошлую молли послушали и раздали вайба 4. новый ос, смешнявый 5. старенький скетчик с троицей, милашные
custom 546065044122844392611💘7custom 53482608580131737764❤🔥2🎉1🖕1
были вчера на лисьей полке в мск 1. портретик 2. нет. 3. коллаба с лешей, фруткаке🥰🥰
❤🔥14custom 52806529488781444598custom 53482608580131737766🎉2💘1🖕1custom 53481260303998165181
у меня ападик спиздила
custom 52806529488781444597💘1🖕1
Продолжаю тырить чужие айпады для порисовашек Считаю что это достойно
💘13❤🔥2
если у вас есть вопросы к тому, чем я занимаюсь эээээ…
🎉13💘6❤🔥5custom 52806529488781444593🖕1🤮1🦄1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @momless33. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[АРХИВ] Momless34 pozorishche🫐” (@momless33), 119 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/momless33.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.