Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

$mol: Новости

@mol_news

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

464subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001324762459
TypeChannel
Username@mol_news
DescriptionНовости об экосистеме фреймворка $mol. Вакансии: #mol_vacancy Один донат: http://tinkoff.ru/cf/1VnW7ZtTeg2 Регулярно: http://boosty.to/hyoo
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mol_news

Growth

4647 Aug 2026, 01:37 — 464 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:47 — 464 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:377 Aug 2026, 01:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 463–465 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:47464no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:37464first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 13 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.4%
avg views ÷ 464 subscribers
Avg views / post
285
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held15 (13 October 202529 July 2026)
Views total285
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
94
Videos
7
Links
182

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 15 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7145.5%
3220.5%
👍1912.2%
🎄53.21%
😭42.56%
👏31.92%
💯31.92%
😁31.92%
21.28%
21.28%
👾21.28%
🤝21.28%
❤‍🔥10.641%
🍾10.641%
🎃10.641%
🎉10.641%
💘10.641%
💩10.641%
🙏10.641%
🤔10.641%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTC285 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Проходим System Design Interview на 140% Проектируем микросервисную архитектуру мессенджера. Сперва с помощью коуча, а потом как-нибудь сами.

🔥101

Signed Дим

25 Apr 2026, 13:44 UTC722 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Препарируем Lit и находим родовые травмы Задействованы самые современные веб-стандарты, однако: - Заявляется отсутствие VDOM, однако он есть, со всеми вытекающими. - Любое исключение капитально ломает весь компонент. - Неизбежные конфликты имён компонент всё ломают. - Адовые тормоза и потребление памяти из-за привязки к DOM. - Тонны бойлерплейта, если нужна кастомизация хотя бы стилей компонент. Поблагодарить: htt

🔥12👍1

Signed Дим

3 Apr 2026, 14:29 UTC658 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мифы о веб-фреймворке $mol Здравствуйте, меня зовут Дмитрий Карловский и я.. автор самого крутого на текущий момент (и в ближайшем будущем) фреймворка $mol. Вот уже десяток лет я рассказываю о заложенных в него идеях, которые конкуренты, если и пытаются повторить, то получается у них плохо. За это время вокруг него сложилось множество мифов, которые люди с радостью ретранслируют друг другу для самоуспокоения. Что

🔥9

Signed Дим

25 Mar 2026, 09:22 UTC693 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что не так с веб-компонентами? Здравствуйте, меня зовут Дмитрий Карловский, и я пилил веб-компоненты, когда их ещё не придумали, делал полноценные компоненты на AngularJS, когда там ещё были только директивы, и разработал компоненто-ориентированный фреймворк $mol с инверсией контроля и статической типизацией, когда это ещё не было мейнстримом. Короче, я немного в теме. И сейчас я расскажу вам, почему мы сразу отка

6🔥3❤‍🔥1

Signed Дим

12 Mar 2026, 22:54 UTC776 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Так, сегодня ничего не изменилось, поэтому у меня для вас важный апдейт... Giper Baza переходит в статус бета-версии, а это значит, что она достаточно стабильна, чтобы ею пользоваться, но в серьёзном бою ещё не бывала. Поэтому сейчас крайне важна обратная связь для выявления критических недостатков, которые со временем было бы сложно исправить, но сейчас ещё не так больно. Большая просьба не писать пока кастомных с

🔥97👏3👾1🙏1

Signed Дим

15 Jan 2026, 20:26 UTC954 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Продолжение на Ютубе: ESLint, Prettier и что не так с насаждением единого стиля Упомянутые материалы: - Автоформатирование - Отступы - Форматирование имён + Копилка благодарностей

👍42💩1

Signed Дим

5 Jan 2026, 16:28 UTC985 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну всё, пора закапывать UTF-8 Здравствуйте, меня зовут Дмитрий Карловский и я... серийный убийца устоявшихся стандартов. Сегодня я выследил и нанёс критический урон UTF-8. И сейчас я расскажу, как я его переиграл и уничтожил новым стандартом кодирования текста — Unicode Compact Format. Статья про современные текстовые кодировки в виде Гипер Страницы или на Хабре.

👍4🔥41💯1

Signed Дим

31 Dec 2025, 16:48 UTC968 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Под конец года я решил порисовать весёлых картинок допроектировать интересные штуки, над которыми давно чесались руки. Пока что это всё лишь на уровне недоспецификаций, но в качестве источника вдохновения для других может быть полезно. UCF - Unicode Compact Format Всё началось с того, что я наткнулся на интересный эксперимент по бинаризации текста под названием UTF-C, где в борьбе за биты у автора получился целый з

🔥82

Signed Дим

31 Dec 2025, 11:17 UTC564 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У нас тут под Новый Год большое обновление малой кровью. А именно импрув $mol_pop - компонента для показа контекстных всплывашек. В целом, всплывающие окна - зло, так как перекрывают собой интерфейс. И в общем случае, лучше открывать для них отдельную страницу в сторонке. Но когда надо выбрать значение в селекте из пары пунктов - открывать отдельную страницу было было оверкиллом. Тут-то и выходит на сцену $mol_pop,

🔥7🎄521

Signed Дим

23 Nov 2025, 11:52 UTC681 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В этот четверг на PiterJS #84 буду рассказывать про то, как появился VaryPack: Проектируем как синьор: универсальная бинаризация Проанализируем существующие форматы бинарной сериализации произвольных данных и спроектируем новый с нуля со всем необходимым, но без всего лишнего. Трансляция и запись будет тут. Но могу и бесплатно подогнать входной билет, если кто хочет послушать вживую.

3

Signed Дим

13 Nov 2025, 18:30 UTC≈1,140 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то зарелизил спеку VaryPack - новый, простой, гибкий, шустрый и компактный формат бинарной сериализации произвольных данных. TS библиотека в MAM - $mol_vary, в NPM - mol_vary. Это всего 600 строчек кода, которые легко портировать на любой другой язык. ⚖️ Комплексный бенчмарк 🔫 Киллер фичи Дедупликация. Строки, числа, шейпы объектов (упорядоченные списки имён полей) не дублируются, благодаря встроенной под

🔥921🍾1🎉1👾1

Signed Дим

28 Oct 2025, 16:42 UTC811 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не сможет. Так и живём.

😭41🤔1

Signed Дим

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mol_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 508,455 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“$mol: Новости” (@mol_news), 464 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mol_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.