Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Лаборатория молекулярной биофизики | ГНЦ ИБХ РАН

@mol_biophys

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

652subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882533427
TypeChannel
Username@mol_biophys
DescriptionЧем же мы занимаемся в лаборатории молекулярной биофизики? Всё просто! Подписывайся на нас и погрузись в мир нанотехнологий! По вопросам писать сюда: @sergiomash
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mol_biophys

Growth

6527 Aug 2026, 14:47 — 652 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:46 — 652 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:478 Aug 2026, 02:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 651–653 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:46652no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:47652first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
255
Videos
16
Links
120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

82 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3745.1%
1822.0%
❤‍🔥1214.6%
😭89.76%
🤣33.66%
👎22.44%
🕊22.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC132 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

IIX Международная конференция по физике частиц и астрофизике (ICPPA-2026) 📌 Когда: 27 - 30 октября 2026 года. 📌Дедлайн подачи тезисов: 14 сентября 2026. 🔗 Сайт: https://indico.particle.mephi.ru/e/ICPPA2026 Дополнительная информация: 🔹Рабочий язык конференции: английский. 🔹Публикации: избранные труды будут опубликованы в рецензируемом журнале, индексируемом в Scopus и Web of Science. 🔹Оргвзнос: для участников из нау

4

22 Jun 2026, 13:12 UTC228 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Давно не было Можете кидать свои мемы в комменты 👇

14🔥3❤‍🔥1

8 Jun 2026, 12:58 UTC327 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Забыл рассказать Я (админ, сотрудник лабы и просто хороший человек) на ПМЭФ был

🔥15👎2🕊2❤‍🔥1

1 Jun 2026, 06:06 UTC356 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Объявлен именя финалистов и лауреаты ВИК 25/26 Каждый, кто дошёл до этого этапа — большой молодец. Знай, что ты уже крут(а). Отдельно поздравляем студентов, которые выполняют свои работы на базе нашей лаборатории! Вы очень крутые 🔥

🔥8❤‍🔥2

30 May 2026, 08:55 UTC317 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вчера были объявления результаты IX Всероссийская олимпиада студентов «Я – профессионал» Поздравляем всех победителей и призёров! И отдельно хотим выделить: 🔵Анастасию Червакову — победитель в дисциплине «Технологии медицины будущего». Анастасия является студентом ИФИБ НИЯУ МИФИ и копирайтером этого канала (Настя красава); 🔵Андрея Старостина — выпускника Сеченовского университета, секретаря кафедры № 93 ИФИБ НИЯУ

🔥11❤‍🔥8

25 May 2026, 13:02 UTC274 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @empty_laboratory_spacesPhoto

#грустная_лаборатория

😭8🤣3

23 May 2026, 09:09 UTC267 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

В чём главная причина, почему MALDI-ToF до сих пор не стал рутинным методом диагностики вирусных инфекций?

  1. Низкое разрешение времяпролётного анализатора6%
  2. Отсутствие коммерческих приборов13%
  3. Проблемы на входе (ионизация крупных частиц, шум) и интерпретации данных75%
  4. Метод слишком дешёвый и ненадёжный6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 May 2026, 09:08 UTC263 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Как изотопные метки (например, глюкоза с ¹³C) помогают в масс-спектрометрии?

  1. Увеличивают разрешение прибора0%
  2. Позволяют проследить путь атомов в метаболизме по сдвигу пиков80%
  3. Заменяют матрицу CHCA0%
  4. Устраняют фрагментацию20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 May 2026, 09:07 UTC208 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Почему рядом с пиком молекулярного иона M⁺ всегда есть небольшой пик (M+1)⁺?

  1. Это артефакт лазера6%
  2. Из-за примеси воды в матрице13%
  3. Из-за природного содержания тяжёлых стабильных изотопов50%
  4. Из-за димеризации аналита31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 May 2026, 09:06 UTC172 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Что откладывается по оси X в масс-спектре?

  1. Интенсивность сигнала в процентах13%
  2. Время пролёта иона19%
  3. Отношение массы иона к его заряду (m/z)63%
  4. Температура ионизации6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 May 2026, 09:05 UTC167 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какую точность показал метод прямого профилирования мазков SARS-CoV-2 на MALDI-ToF с алгоритмом k ближайших соседей (k-NN)?

  1. 99%31%
  2. 85%46%
  3. 68%15%
  4. 45%8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 May 2026, 09:04 UTC169 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

В чём суть метода «MALDI-ToF как детектор ПЦР»?

  1. Масс-спектрометр измеряет амплифицированную РНК36%
  2. Масс-спектрометр измеряет олигонуклеотиды (15–50 нт) вместо пептидов45%
  3. ПЦР заменяет стадию ионизации9%
  4. MALDI-ToF амплифицирует сигнал вместо термоциклера9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mol_biophys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 May 2026, 09:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz16 voters

В чём главная причина, почему MALDI-ToF до сих пор не стал рутинным методом диагностики вирусных инфекций?

  1. Низкое разрешение времяпролётного анализатора6%
  2. Отсутствие коммерческих приборов13%
  3. Проблемы на входе (ионизация крупных частиц, шум) и интерпретации данных75%
  4. Метод слишком дешёвый и ненадёжный6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 May 2026, 09:08 UTCAnonymous Quiz15 voters

Как изотопные метки (например, глюкоза с ¹³C) помогают в масс-спектрометрии?

  1. Увеличивают разрешение прибора0%
  2. Позволяют проследить путь атомов в метаболизме по сдвигу пиков80%
  3. Заменяют матрицу CHCA0%
  4. Устраняют фрагментацию20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 May 2026, 09:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz16 voters

Почему рядом с пиком молекулярного иона M⁺ всегда есть небольшой пик (M+1)⁺?

  1. Это артефакт лазера6%
  2. Из-за примеси воды в матрице13%
  3. Из-за природного содержания тяжёлых стабильных изотопов50%
  4. Из-за димеризации аналита31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 May 2026, 09:06 UTCAnonymous Quiz16 voters

Что откладывается по оси X в масс-спектре?

  1. Интенсивность сигнала в процентах13%
  2. Время пролёта иона19%
  3. Отношение массы иона к его заряду (m/z)63%
  4. Температура ионизации6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 May 2026, 09:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz13 voters

Какую точность показал метод прямого профилирования мазков SARS-CoV-2 на MALDI-ToF с алгоритмом k ближайших соседей (k-NN)?

  1. 99%31%
  2. 85%46%
  3. 68%15%
  4. 45%8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 May 2026, 09:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz11 voters

В чём суть метода «MALDI-ToF как детектор ПЦР»?

  1. Масс-спектрометр измеряет амплифицированную РНК36%
  2. Масс-спектрометр измеряет олигонуклеотиды (15–50 нт) вместо пептидов45%
  3. ПЦР заменяет стадию ионизации9%
  4. MALDI-ToF амплифицирует сигнал вместо термоциклера9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 10 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 817,610 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лаборатория молекулярной биофизики | ГНЦ ИБХ РАН” (@mol_biophys), 652 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mol_biophys.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.