Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мокривский завали ебало

Channel

Мокривский завали ебало

@mokrivskiybet

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

417,863subscribers

+315,218 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002201307152
TypeChannel
Usernames@mokrivskiybet @overdrive
DescriptionКлуб фанатов Rain
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held66
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mokrivskiybet

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

98,376432,065265,220.5417,8636 August 202625 September 2026
66 measurements spanning 50 days, net +315,218. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,323–482,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 16:37417,863-3,272
19 Sept 2026, 04:39421,135+322,759
17 Sept 2026, 21:5898,376-324,599
16 Sept 2026, 20:15422,975+324,010
15 Sept 2026, 18:1798,965-324,977
14 Sept 2026, 19:20423,942+324,943
14 Sept 2026, 02:3798,999-325,945
13 Sept 2026, 03:00424,944+325,919
12 Sept 2026, 11:4099,025-327,096
11 Sept 2026, 06:57426,121+326,863
10 Sept 2026, 06:4199,258-328,236
8 Sept 2026, 09:40427,494+327,871
6 Sept 2026, 23:1899,623-329,445
5 Sept 2026, 03:39429,068+329,090
4 Sept 2026, 09:5899,978-329,818
3 Sept 2026, 06:59429,796+329,670
2 Sept 2026, 23:05100,126-330,280
2 Sept 2026, 01:15430,406+330,139
1 Sept 2026, 19:05100,267-330,673
1 Sept 2026, 00:57430,940first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.62%
avg views ÷ 417,863 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,500
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.339%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held83 (6 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total1,009,440
Reactions total3,424
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 23:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
467
Videos
9
Links
391

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,241 reactions across 83 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,08349.5%
💩1,33316.2%
🤮1,16314.1%
👍83610.1%
👎82610.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,241 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 20:42 UTC≈5,060 views47 reactionsread 26 September 2026

✅потрепали нервишки, но выиграли изи

❤39💩6👎1🤮1

Signed EnNIway

26 Sept 2026, 10:47 UTC≈8,380 views73 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

РУБРИКА СТАВКИ ОТ АРСЯНА 🤩 #футбол 🇪🇺Лига Наций УЕФА, Лига А, тур 1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿Англия - Испания🇪🇸 Просто болеем за испанцев йоу 🤙

🤮36❤28👍6👎2💩1

Signed EnNIway

24 Sept 2026, 20:42 UTC≈11,700 views35 reactionsread 26 September 2026

✅1/2 фух бля греки тянули до последнего, но выиграли. Уходим сегодня в плюсах 😉 Хз на сборные ставить вообще не нравится, мб на некст тур уже залечу...

❤30👎2🤮2💩1

Signed EnNIway

24 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC≈12,400 views47 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Posted without readable text

❤30💩10👎5🤮2

Signed EnNIway

20 Sept 2026, 17:11 UTC≈20,100 views129 reactionsread 26 September 2026

✅че там че там ребят плаки плаки??? Комментаторы сук ахвхахах

❤107🤮17👍2💩2👎1

Signed EnNIway

20 Sept 2026, 12:03 UTC≈18,600 views137 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

РУБРИКА СТАВКИ ОТ АРСЯНА 🤩 #футбол ⚽️ЛаЛига, 7 тур. ⚽️Атлетико М - Реал М⚽️ Матч дня. Ставлю на АТМ, просто потому что эти бездари в форме и кэф на них не оправданно высокий, а Реал меня не убедил еще в матче с Интером...посмотрим как на деле будет. Ваши мысли?

🤮74❤49👎6💩5👍3

Signed EnNIway

19 Sept 2026, 20:59 UTC≈17,900 views53 reactionsread 26 September 2026

✅3/4 Заканчиваем сегодняшний день так, считаю ахуенный результат, всем доброй ночи 🤙

❤44💩7👎1🤮1

Signed EnNIway

19 Sept 2026, 17:39 UTC≈16,400 views46 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

⚽️Бундеслига, тур 4.⚽️ Штутгарт - БД⚽️ Еще такая закидка на БД на 2й тайм поверим в них

💩24👍13❤4🤮3👎2

Signed EnNIway

19 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈16,700 views38 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Posted without readable text

💩21❤14🤮2👎1

Signed EnNIway

16 Sept 2026, 20:46 UTC≈30,200 views84 reactionsread 26 September 2026

❌сегодня жестко меня приспустило Сорри гайс

👍46💩33❤4👎1

Signed EnNIway

16 Sept 2026, 18:18 UTC≈31,600 views85 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

РУБРИКА СТАВКИ ОТ АРСЯНА 🤩 #футбол ⚽️Лига Европы, тур 1. ⚽️Милан - Бенфика⚽️ Ладно поверим в Милан

👎61❤19🤮4💩1

Signed EnNIway

16 Sept 2026, 12:10 UTC≈29,200 views73 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

РУБРИКА СТАВКИ ОТ АРСЯНА 🤩 #футбол ⚽️Лига Европы, тур 1. 🇦🇲Арарат-Армения - Спарта Прага🇨🇿 Ну как и писал, сегодня иду на этот матч, поэтому ставлю на ребят, ставка рисковая, но рабочая 🤙 P.S. Если чет интересное будет мб засниму

💩62❤6👍5

Signed EnNIway

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @mokrivskiybet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@mokrivskiybet edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мокривский завали ебало” (@mokrivskiybet), 417,863 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mokrivskiybet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.