Channel
@moi_mishata
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
602subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001548837785 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moi_mishata |
| Created | 12 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moi_mishata |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 602 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 604 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 604 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,762 |
| Reactions total | 113 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
113 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 63 | 55.8% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 15.9% | |
| 🤔 | 13 | 11.5% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 7.08% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 4.42% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 3.54% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.77% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Из-за страхов вырабатывая психологически защиты. Но я так в этом преуспел что начал вырабатывать психологические нападения Это когда ты словом или делом пытаешься оказать положительное воздействие на мир другого человека в моем случае они скорее походят на мясные штурмы, где я день ото дня пытаюсь распутать топологию людей судить которых бы не взялся даже сам Евклид (70 процентов из них воображаемые, но они тоже по…
❤2
Как хорошо что это всего лишь жизнь
💯6❤2😁2
Красота без любви как рыцарь без удачи
❤5💩1
Ее любовь стоит дорого но я еду зайцем
❤10💩2
Это трилобиты — простейшие древние существа которые много лет тусят дне Совсем как мы с пацанами
❤8😁2
Четыре года назад MESTO появилось в небольшой локации, где мы начали собирать сообщество и проводить первые события. А в 2023 году мы переехали в трёхэтажное здание, которое стояло заброшенным после ковида и требовало огромных вложений сил, времени и денег. А главное: нужна была крепкая команда, способная воплотить смелую идею в жизнь: создать из трёхэтажной заброшки одно из самых заметных независимых культурных прос…
❤3
В творческих коммандах не увольняют Здесь принято доводить до увольнения Провожать девушку до психоза, коллегу до нервного срыва Вообщем, оставаться джентельменами
❤12
Мы с пацанми (чуть потеряли форму)
😁9
Человек с которым я не общался в телеграмме много лет неожиданно написал мне Привет. Я ответил Привет и он просто поставил эмодзи с махающей рукой и больше ничего не писал Я будто на улице встретил знакомого пожал руку и пошел дальше. Зачем?
🤔13😁5🐳3
Каждая рыбка имеет право клевать на понравившийся крючок По субъективным наблюдениям приходится с печалью признавать, что всё-таки мальчишки ответственны за большую часть так называемой «хуиты», которая есть в мире. Но всё-таки не настолько чтобы всё спихнуть на них Помимо того, что девчонки создают этого добра тоже порядком, есть ещё другая проблема. Девчонкам в мальчишках нравится всякая хуйня Я их не осуждаю, м…
❤11🌚2🐳2
Мой секьюрити квешен легко взломать поэтому я поставил его женщине с аутизмом она привыкнет и начнет скоро считать так всерьез Женщин с аутизмом при правильном подборе слов можно во что угодно заставить верить особенно если им это самим по кайфу Я это по себе знаю у меня самого есть внутренняя женщина с аутизмом с которой мы все обсуждаем и если она верит правдивости твоих слов то потом ты и сам начинаешь в них вер…
❤10💯2💩1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @moi_mishata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 270,132 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Здравствуйте, дорогие мои мышата” (@moi_mishata), 602 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moi_mishata.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.