Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Fraz

@mohammadfrazTG

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

32,340subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001391085537
TypeChannel
Username@mohammadfrazTG
DescriptionLink to the YouTube channel https://youtube.com/channel/UC81Q2wnuk5KqOFVgAbq4nUw
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mohammadfrazTG

Growth

32,34032,34132,340.511 Aug 2026, 18:01 — 32,341 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 01:33 — 32,340 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 18:0112 Aug 2026, 01:33
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,340–32,341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:3332,340-1
11 Aug 2026, 18:0132,341first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.50%
avg views ÷ 32,340 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,750
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 March 20263 August 2026)
Views total5,500
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
1
Links
552

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC≈1,990 viewsread 12 August 2026

Reality of my 80LPA Salary after TAXES in Dubai vs India https://youtu.be/nWGWcjT-Yho

25 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC≈3,510 viewsread 12 August 2026

How to Become an Ethical Hacker in 2026 | Roadmap, Salaries & Live Hacking https://youtu.be/KxOnZeFa9ts

5 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC≈5,430 viewsread 12 August 2026

DON'T Buy a Laptop in 2026 Until You Watch This! 🛑 (Students Beware) https://youtu.be/M-t5Y0LrfuA

1 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC≈5,670 viewsread 12 August 2026

Why You Should Still Learn CODING in 2026 to Get a JOB? https://youtu.be/G7ziLApUaEw

1 Jun 2026, 06:00 UTC≈7,170 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Guys, let’s make some projects using Google Antigravity? It will be like 4 days free course on YouTube

  1. Yess, maza aaega89%
  2. No, bahot jagah se seekh liya14%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 May 2026, 12:29 UTC≈7,820 viewsread 12 August 2026

Launching Free Generative AI Course with Industry-Grade Projects and Latest Tools https://youtu.be/XQzi17xuXHk

24 Apr 2026, 13:33 UTC≈8,660 viewsread 12 August 2026

Future of IT Job Market and AI | 3 Data Backed Predictions https://youtu.be/RxeIgJUlWAk

11 Apr 2026, 12:36 UTC≈8,720 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

In which language you want to do DSA

  1. Java66%
  2. CPP38%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Apr 2026, 16:48 UTC≈9,430 viewsread 12 August 2026

Starting Generative AI for Developers Course on YouTube

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mohammadfrazTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jun 2026, 06:00 UTCAnonymous Poll452 voters

Guys, let’s make some projects using Google Antigravity? It will be like 4 days free course on YouTube

  1. Yess, maza aaega89%
  2. No, bahot jagah se seekh liya14%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Apr 2026, 12:36 UTCAnonymous Poll871 voters

In which language you want to do DSA

  1. Java66%
  2. CPP38%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Arsh Goyal : Youtube
@goyalarsh · 194,708
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
TheSanskaarSingh
@codeslearningTG · 269,931
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Tricky Man
@Trickyman2 · 155,283
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fraz” (@mohammadfrazTG), 32,340 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mohammadfrazTG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.