A couple of weeks ago, we asked you to tell us how you use AI by filling out a quick 1-minute survey 📱 The response was amazing, and we loved reading every answer. Thank you to everyone who joined in! 🙌 Congratulations to Dishal Vala, the winner of our iPhone Duo giveaway! 🎉 Didn’t win this time? Stay tuned, because more surveys and giveaways are coming soon! 👀

Channel
WeMakeDevs
@WeMakeDevs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,861subscribers
-1,078 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001579486688 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WeMakeDevs |
| Description | https://wemakedevs.org |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WeMakeDevs |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 12:20 | 23,861 | -16 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 01:07 | 23,877 | -14 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:10 | 23,891 | -8 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:28 | 23,899 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:08 | 23,904 | -14 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:30 | 23,918 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:40 | 23,923 | -14 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:04 | 23,937 | -7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:35 | 23,944 | -13 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 23,957 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:08 | 23,966 | -15 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:19 | 23,981 | -11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 23,992 | -16 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 24,008 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:29 | 24,016 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:08 | 24,023 | -20 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 24,043 | -11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:37 | 24,054 | -17 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:21 | 24,071 | -14 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:06 | 24,085 | first reading |
Engagement
118 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.92%
- avg views ÷ 23,861 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 697
- 28 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.254%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 28
- of 118 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 118 (10 July 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 19,527 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 18:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 372
- Videos
- 69
- Links
- 483
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 36m 25s
- Average length
- 1m 49s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 85 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 127 | 78.4% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 16.7% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.617% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.617% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (3.57%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Today's the last day to submit your projects for the Flip the Switch Hackathon! 🚀 Build workflows where AI agents collaborate with your teammates. Using Switch AI, connect agents to Slack, Teams, Discord or Telegram and put them to work on real tasks. There's $10,000 in prizes across three main tracks, plus AirPods 5, Logitech keyboards, cash prizes and swag up for grabs. Don't miss the deadline. Submit your proje…
Two winners, two creative voice-first projects, and some brilliant ways to put Wispr Flow to work! 🎉 Meet the winners of No Hands: The Wispr Challenge! 🏆 Jaya Surya Penumatcha – Builders Track: 1 Lakh 🏆 Anvitha PR – No-Code Track: 1 Lakh Congratulations to both winners, and a huge thank you to everyone who participated and built with Wispr Flow! 🙌 Also, a big shoutout to the Wispr Flow team for making this chall…
❤1
Win a fully paid trip to Berlin for your whole team. That's the grand prize at Festive Hacks, a one-day, in-person hackathon we're running with WeAreDevelopers on Nov 25 at WeAreDevelopers Conference India in Bengaluru. The winners go to WeAreDevelopers World Congress 2027 with all expenses covered and VIP tickets, second place gets ₹2 lakh and third gets ₹1 lakh. Seats are limited, so it's application only, and e…
❤1
The Graph Hacks results are in, and three standout AI agent projects have won some incredible prizes! 🏆 Congratulations to all three winners! 🏆 Arnab Saha – Agents That Act on Connected Data: iPhone 18 Pro 🏆 Aymaan Pathan – Agent Memory and Coordination: PS5 + GTA VI 🏆 Shreyash Mandal – Company Brain: M6 Mac mini A huge thank you to everyone who participated and brought their ideas to life, and to FalkorDB for m…
❤3
We’re LIVE with the Flip the Switch Hackathon! ⚡ Join us now at 8:30 PM IST as we kick things off with WeMakeDevs and DevTools Academy with Phil Conway, Timo Bozsolik-Torres, and Kunal Kushwaha. Here’s what’s on the agenda: > Introduction to Switch AI and how it works > Connecting AI agents to Slack, Teams and Discord > Hackathon tracks, challenges and $10,000 in prizes > Project ideas and submission guidelines Go…
❤3
Our final $100 winner of No Hands: The Wispr Challenge is Shreepal Goyal! 🏆🎉 The winning project, Spec Whisper, helps turn rough ideas into clear, structured instructions for AI coding agents. Simply dictate your ideas using WisprFlow, including corrections and changes along the way. Spec Whisper extracts the final intent, identifies missing details, asks the right questions, and creates a build spec with scope, ac…
❤2
₹50,000 in cash is up for grabs, and the winner will be picked at random from the Wispr Flow leaderboard! 👀💸 One lucky participant will win ₹50,000 in the No Hands: The Wispr Challenge, regardless of their leaderboard position. 🎙️ Build with your voice using WisprFlow 📈 Upload your weekly usage card to get on the leaderboard 🎲 Get on the leaderboard for a chance to win! The challenge ends on October 31, so there's…
Today’s $100 winner of No Hands: The Wispr Challenge is Afreen Hossain! 🏆🎉 The winning project, Lumi, lets you control your monitor with your voice instead of reaching behind the screen to press tiny buttons. From adjusting brightness and volume to switching picture modes, you can do it all with simple voice commands. Using Wispr Flow, Afreen can speak a command and let Lumi handle the rest, making monitor controls…
❤1
An iPhone Duo worth 3 Lakh could be yours, and it only takes 60 seconds to enter! 📱👀 All you have to do is answer a few quick questions about how you use AI. Just a minute of your time for a shot at a seriously cool prize! 🏆 Winner announced next week! Take the survey: https://forms.gle/xHFL98C88C9mmwQN8
Flip the Switch is our next online hackathon, running November 4 to 7 with $10,000 in cash prizes. Connect any coding agent you already use to Slack, Discord or Telegram with Switch, and build a workflow that gets real work done with your team. You can join from anywhere in the world, solo or in a team of up to 4, and the top 50 projects get swag boxes. Sign up at wemakedevs.org/hackathons/switch
❤1
Today’s $100 winner of No Hands: The Wispr Challenge is Deekshitha Ileni! 🏆🎉 Meet VoiceTrace, a tool that turns bug reporting from a 10-minute typing task into a 10-second voice note. It captures console errors, failed network requests, and clicked elements while you test a website. Just describe the bug using WisprFlow, and VoiceTrace generates a GitHub-ready report with a root-cause diagnosis and suggested code f…
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @WeMakeDevs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 11 posts on @WeMakeDevs as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 13 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 3 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 4
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@kirat_internal_group · 26,249#1
@goyalarsh · 187,648#2
@abhishekveeramalla · 50,405#3
@web3hiring · 60,993#4
@vijaykushal · 55,041#5
@mohammadfrazTG · 31,158#6
@linkedin_learning · 216,619#7
@LinuxMastery · 68,257#8
@LearnPython3 · 125,047#9
@OceanOfJobs · 19,972#10
@arunchauhanofficial · 53,602#11
@heuristics_ai · 2,618#12
@tcs_nqt_resources · 102,410#13
@placify100 · 6,068#14
@webdev_trainings · 133,578#15
@NotesGallery1 · 87,865#16
@crackingthecodinginterview · 51,890#17
@dtc_courses · 7,471#18
@sanketbackend · 4,483#19
@Viralveda · 3,201#20
@generative_ai_ml · 798#21
@Unlocked_Coding · 45,055#22
@github_repositories_bds · 11,215#23
@AdarshChetan · 24,816#24
@Techvine · 5,439#25
@trainwithshubham · 11,611#26
@github_repos · 28,145#27
@geeksforgeeks_official · 17,474#28
@bigdataspecialist · 26,239#29
@DevOpsSREbootcamp3 · 6,091#30
@coding_interview_preparation · 5,852#31
@thecodeskool · 7,168#32
@TheCompileSquad · 2,155#33
@Gwcomsciandinfo · 76,718#34
@codeforces_official · 71,585#35
@gocareers · 78,115#36
@offcampus_phodenge · 63,825#37
@JavaScript_Trainings · 96,178#38
@internfreak · 57,761#39
@remotejobss · 161,974#40
@threejsbybrunosimon · 5,908#41
@TechUprise_Updates · 50,098#42
@web3newsfeed · 11,712#43
@ViralVeda_a · 1,235#44
@clouddost · 3,917#45
@udemyrip · 68,784#46
@PLACEMENTLELO · 152,605#47
@cpabhinav · 21,110#48
@freshershunt · 276,422#49
@machine_learning_courses · 96,444#50
@getjobss · 112,921#51
@off_campus_jobs_and_internships · 63,870#52
@TorchBearerr · 18,245#53
@offcampusjobsupdatess · 37,948#54
@rohit_negi_family · 6,871#55
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kirat_internal_group · 26,249
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 12 September 2026
@mohammadfrazTG · 31,158
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
@AdarshChetan · 24,816
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 September 2026
@abhishekveeramalla · 50,405
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
@goyalarsh · 187,648
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@JobsGallery · 24,527
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 September 2026
@offcampusjobsite · 20,241
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 September 2026
@tcs_nqt_resources · 102,410
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
@GatewaysAcademy · 48,981
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 26 August 2026
@cpabhinav · 21,110
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 September 2026
@jobs_and_internships_updates1 · 20,574
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 September 2026
@codinginpyofficial · 23,988
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 September 2026
@jobs_and_internships_updates · 193,356
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@gocareers · 78,115
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026
@offcampusjobsupdatess · 37,948
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 31 August 2026
@TechProgramMind_official · 39,561
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@HelpEachOtherToGetJob · 23,027
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
@dot_aware · 42,121
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WeMakeDevs” (@WeMakeDevs), 23,861 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WeMakeDevs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.