Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ВписКрисы confession 💕

Channel

ВписКрисы confession 💕

@mogilshiki_confession

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

94subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003069736895
TypeChannel
Username@mogilshiki_confession
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mogilshiki_confession

Growth

919693.57 August 2026 — 91 subscribers9 August 2026 — 91 subscribers15 August 2026 — 92 subscribers22 August 2026 — 94 subscribers30 August 2026 — 96 subscribers9 September 2026 — 95 subscribers18 September 2026 — 94 subscribers947 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90–97 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:5594-1
9 Sept 2026, 15:4195-1
30 Aug 2026, 08:4496+2
22 Aug 2026, 14:3294+2
15 Aug 2026, 11:0692+1
9 Aug 2026, 14:0291no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:5591first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊2529.1%
1517.4%
🎅89.30%
😱89.30%
78.14%
❤‍🔥78.14%
custom 529229235749494433455.81%
custom 531650545896445565855.81%
🥰33.49%
🌚22.33%
💊11.16%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC38 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В качестве данного Арта виноват не я, который рисовал его в 3 ночи, а способ отправки его сюда *:..。o○ 🪓🔪 ○o。..:* #тейк #арт #впискрисы

🥰3🌚2💊1

Signed Nastyxa_glad #TED

5 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC44 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Нарисовала,потому что мне скучно *:..。o○ 🪓🔪 ○o。..:* #тейк #арт #впискрисы

4🕊1

Signed Nastyxa_glad #TED

5 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC40 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

«Как вы заполучили Арахнофобию?» 🔪— Хз, меня в целом пугает что-то маленькое, ползающее, непредсказуемое и быстрое... 🪓— Не знаю? Не люблю насекомых вообще

4

Signed Nastyxa_glad #TED

3 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC50 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

*:..。o○ 🪓🔪 ○o。..:* #тейк #арт #впискрисы

🕊61🎅1custom 52922923574949443341

Signed Nastyxa_glad #TED

1 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC69 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

[💜💫/🐱🍷] — Ну я хрен его знает *:..。o○ 🪓🔪 ○o。..:* #адмтейк #пикча #впискрисы

custom 52922923574949443344🕊1custom 53165054589644556581

Signed Nastyxa_glad #TED

1 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC79 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вроде, эт все мои рисунки по впискрисам *:..。o○ 🪓🔪 ○o。..:* #тейк #гача #арт #впискрисы

7🕊1

Signed Nastyxa_glad #TED

1 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC59 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я гача лайф споюю Ах гача лайф я тебя люблю 🥶🥶❤️🥶🥶❤️🥶❤️🥶❤️🥶🥶❤️🥶❤️🥶❤️🥶❤️🥶🥶❤️🥶❤️🥶❤️🥶 У Криса зелёное это аура, а у Вписа это вр*ск*с ----------- Я обещаю что нарисую что-то адекватное, а не буду страдать пиздой *:..。o○ 🪓🔪 ○o。..:* #тейк #гача #впискрисы

🎅5🕊2

Signed Nastyxa_glad #TED

1 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC57 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Клянусь, тейки не выкладываются потому что Настя перекапывает грядки на даче, а не потому что она ленивая жопа #life

🕊8

Signed Nastyxa_glad #TED

30 Jul 2026, 21:19 UTC72 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#репост Вот и фанф

🕊2

Signed Nastyxa_glad #TED

30 Jul 2026, 21:19 UTC69 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @nastyxa_glad_vigvam

https://telegra.ph/Ne-snova-07-30 Я вам написала зарисовочку Это типа если бы Крискаса и Впискаса поймали, тут как бы могильщики, но как бы и нет, решайте сами

2custom 53165054589644556582🎅1🕊1

Signed Nastyxa_glad #TED

30 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC72 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кхм... Вернемся к вопросу о свадьбе... *:..。o○ 🪓🔪 ○o。..:* #тейк #арт #впискрисы

4🕊2🎅1

Signed Nastyxa_glad #TED

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mogilshiki_confession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ВписКрисы confession 💕” (@mogilshiki_confession), 94 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mogilshiki_confession.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.