Консультации: 0x3.ru/modicine
Канал Никиты Жукова: врач-невролог, психиатр, автор Расстрельного списка препаратов и серии книг Модицина, мемецинский директор.
Ещё у меня был бар: @ebmbar
И пивной канал с мемами: @medrink
Created
1 December 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 96 days, net -120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,107–13,263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 16:48
13,125
-2
9 Nov 2026, 06:30
13,127
-5
7 Nov 2026, 00:10
13,132
+1
4 Nov 2026, 23:58
13,131
-3
3 Nov 2026, 22:07
13,134
-1
3 Nov 2026, 01:16
13,135
-1
2 Nov 2026, 03:00
13,136
-1
1 Nov 2026, 00:00
13,137
-3
31 Oct 2026, 00:16
13,140
-3
30 Oct 2026, 02:39
13,143
-3
29 Oct 2026, 02:27
13,146
+1
28 Oct 2026, 01:57
13,145
-3
27 Oct 2026, 03:48
13,148
+2
26 Oct 2026, 02:51
13,146
-2
25 Oct 2026, 06:00
13,148
-2
24 Oct 2026, 07:26
13,150
+1
23 Oct 2026, 04:37
13,149
-2
22 Oct 2026, 05:28
13,151
-8
20 Oct 2026, 22:18
13,159
+2
19 Oct 2026, 17:37
13,157
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 9 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 13,125 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,540
1 post measured
Reaction rate
7.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held
25 (9 October 2025 – 27 October 2026)
Views total
2,540
Reactions total
179
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
371
Videos
240
Links
155
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
10m 38s
Average length
1m 46s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,066 reactions across 24 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,211
46.4%
🔥
1,655
18.3%
👍
1,482
16.3%
😁
644
7.10%
💯
432
4.77%
🤣
173
1.91%
👏
136
1.50%
🤔
104
1.15%
🤯
43
0.474%
😐
31
0.342%
😢
28
0.309%
💔
26
0.287%
😱
22
0.243%
🙏
17
0.188%
⚡
16
0.176%
👀
12
0.132%
👌
12
0.132%
🤝
9
0.099%
🥰
7
0.077%
🎉
4
0.044%
1 further kind
2
0.022%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,066 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Не всякий, кто избегает людей, их боится.
Разбираю, почему РАС часто путают с социофобией и куда глядеть чтоб не ошибиться.
—
Раньше общался, а теперь друзей нет
С этой фразы часто начинается диагноз «социофобия» и часто он неверный.
Социальное тревожное расстройство (СТР или социофобия на древнепсихиатрическом) очень пересекается с аутизмом, но всё же это разные вещи: социофобия откуда-то берётся и может полнос…
Шея просто болит и ни в чём не виновата
По статистике, до половины людей рабочего возраста иногда сталкиваются с болью в шее. А это значит, что если шея у тебя не болит сейчас, то с большой вероятностью заболит в течение ближайших месяцев, так что давай детально изучим что там происходит.
Обычно человек думает, что если у него заболела шея, то там должна быть какая-то наглядная причина: что-то сломалось, сместилось…
— У вас подвывих остеопата!
Подвывих шейного позвонка — мой любимый диагноз из фейковых.
Смешно тут вот что: настоящий подвывих существует. И при нём мануальщику и остеопату шею трогать категорически нельзя. А именно они их и раздают, чтобы потом править.
Фейковый диагноз “подвывих” раздаётся всем направо и налево, а потом якобы “вправляется”. Знаете, что будет если вправить то, чего не было? Технически это называ…
Тест на стресс для тех, кто утонул в философии прошлый раз
Берём любую нагрузку: работу, тренировки, недосып, детей, дежурства и задаём себе три вопроса:
1. После нагрузки я возвращаюсь к исходному состоянию?
2. Способность переносить такую нагрузку растёт?
3. Между нагрузками есть период восстановления?
Три Да — йеее, это хороший стресс: вы не просто выживаете, вы развиваетесь.
Да на 1 и 3, но Нет на 2 — сносно: …
Тест: какой у вас стресс
Когда-то давным-давно один маленький мальчик решил, что к чёрту эту вашу христианскую мораль с культом страданий, и предложил вместо неё волю к власти, преодоление себя и идею сверхчеловека. Бог умер, сила это хорошо, превосходство и самоутверждение — збс.
Эту точку зрения можно не разделять, но одну фразу вы точно знаете: всё, что нас не убивает, делает нас сильнее. Того мальчика звали Фри…
Вы спите по 5 часов, пьёте кофе вместо отдыха, раздражаетесь на всё вокруг и считаете, что так и должно быть. Потому что вы же эффективный взрослый человек.
А потом эффектно удивляетесь, откуда тревожность, давление, лишний вес и ощущение, что жизнь превратилась в бесконечное «надо».
Вот она идеальная ловушка: насилие над собой называется взрослением, хотя по факту это хронический режим, в котором ты постоянно трати…
Если вам не помогают обычные антидепры — значит, пора пересесть на велик.
Дело в том, что СИОЗС — это общественный транспорт. Сертралиновый троллейбус № 3-Золофт распахивает объятья и неспешно, но предсказуемо едет по заранее определённому маршруту. Зачастую можно даже не прикладывать никаких усилий — разве что бывает, приходится торчать в ожидании на остановке или иногда держаться всеми силами за поручень в толкучк…
Сколько раз вы слышали от врача: “вам кофе нельзя”?
Спойлер: “у вас давление/голова/тревожность/антидепрессанты — не пейте кофе” — это не медицина. Это мифы, привычка и тревога врача, переложенная на пациента.
Проблема в том, что это чаще всего не противопоказания. И ещё хуже — лишние запреты обычно делают пациенту только хуже: человеку и так тяжело, а ему ещё запрещают то, что приносит удовольствие и помогает держ…
Иногда антидепрессанты “не работают” не потому что они плохие, а потому что курс организован так, будто это альтернативная медицина.
3 красных флага
1) Гомеопатия! Гомеопатия?! Есть гомеопатические антидепрессанты? О да, ещё как! Например, Золофт, если назначить его в режиме «полтаблетки на полгода». Никакой магии не произойдёт, потому что гомеопатия не работает.
У каждого препарата есть минимальная эффективная доз…
Метафорическое объяснение зачем нужен диагноз «аутизм» взрослому самостоятельному человеку.
Кстати, и для СДВГ это справедливо.
(ниже текст из видео, если вам неудобно смотреть)
Представьте себе, что вы всю жизнь пишете ногой. Снимаете обувь, берёте ручку пальцами ноги — и пишете. Медленно, неудобно, куча лишних движений. Но вы привыкли.
Так произошло, потому что когда вы учились писать, у вас не получалось писат…
❤222👍158🔥77💯24👏3🤔1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @modicine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@modicine named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ebm_familyday named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Пей таблетки! | MedIQLab @mediq · 65,586 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“modicine” (@modicine), 13,125 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/modicine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.