@modemorph_ai_bot — AI-гардероб
👚 Цифровой гардероб + онлайн шопинг с точной примеркой
📲 Оцифруй вещи за пару минут → получай образы по погоде и случаю
🛍 Подскажет, что докупить, чтобы собрать больше образов
@dzerusyaa
Created
Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 175–177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 14:00
176
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:48
176
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
124
Videos
16
Links
19
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
53s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
82 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5323457799835891740
27
32.9%
custom 5409203617854929313
19
23.2%
custom 5433685047406242060
16
19.5%
custom 5449835876785862531
16
19.5%
custom 5330043908846014279
4
4.88%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 11 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @modemorph. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 March 2026 to 26 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сегодня мы победили в финале Акселератора ВШБ Стартап Клуба.
Но честно — главная победа случилась раньше. В момент, когда мы наконец поняли, что именно решаем.
Мы заходили с продуктом и гипотезой. После интервью с Ozon, брендами и платформами картина перевернулась. Проблема не в качестве товара. Алгоритмы Wildberries и Ozon видят клики — но не видят шкаф. Они не знают, что у человека уже есть дома. И рекомендуют ве…
Сегодня на улице +20, и вместо того чтобы думать о жакетах и многослойности, мне вдруг захотелось открыть наше приложение и посмотреть, что оно предложит именно мне. И вот тут я поняла, что персонализация — это не просто “похожие товары”, а целая история о том, как тебе собирают образ под твой вайб и привычки.
Меня особенно зацепили джинсы. Не сами по себе, а в сочетании с жакетом, поло и грубыми ботинками. Я совсем…
Устали от бесконечных прогулок по торговым центрам, где глаза разбегаются, а в итоге выходишь пустая и идешь домой с плохим настроением, потому что опять побоялась, что это будет очередной импульсивной покупкой, не вписывающейся в гардероб? Звучит знакомо, правда? Это чувство, когда шкаф ломится от одежды, а вы стоите и думаете: «Что же выбрать?»
Честно говоря, это не для меня — тратить часы на поиск чего-то действи…
Привет! Мы обновляем Mode Morph и хотим сделать его таким, чтобы туда хотелось заходить каждый день: за идеями образов, удобным подбором и вещами от любимых брендов, которые правда подходят именно вам.
Для этого очень нужна ваша обратная связь. Опрос простой, в основном с вариантами ответа, займет около 5 минут.
Тем, кто пройдет опрос, отправим доступ к обновленной версии. А тем, кто уже нажимал кнопку Start / уже …
Почему сейчас — простым языком 👇
Покупать одежду стало слишком легко.
Открыл маркетплейс — и у тебя тысячи вариантов 🛍
По данным Data Insight, большинство покупок одежды уже давно происходит онлайн.
Но вместе с этим появилась другая проблема:
выбора стало так много, что стало сложнее понять — это вообще мое? я это буду носить? с чем?
—
И запрос у людей поменялся.
Раньше хотелось вдохновения.
Сейчас хочется быстр…
«Игра, в которой не бывает проигравших»
Я часто думаю: зачем мы вообще покупаем новые вещи? Чтобы нравиться себе? Чтобы выделиться? Чтобы вписаться? А как же все вещи в шкафу, 80% которых не носится..?
А потом смотрю на экран своего телефона и вижу, как вы в @modemorph_ai_bot играете. Перетаскиваете вещи, которые не видели годами, меняете местами, смеётесь над неожиданными сочетаниями, сохраняете луки, шлёте подруг…
Встречайте!!! у нас появился стилист Лиза💌 с изысканным вкусом — это её первые образы!
Высокие сапоги на массивном каблуке придают луку дерзкий характер. 🌟🤩
Лаконичная белая сумка-тоут завершает образ.♣️
Все ссылки на вещи из луков по доступным ценам из проверенных нами магазинов с wb уже в приложении — раздел «Идеи» (сохраняйте понравившиеся сочетания!).
Лиза: @outcomingfrom 🫀
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @modemorph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Мини-опрос) Подскажите, пожалуйста знаете ли вы как попасть в приложение и зарегистрированы ли ?
Да, знаю, тестил/ла, добавляла вещи в гардероб67%
Да, знаю, но не тестил/ла0%
Не зарегистрирован/на, но знаю, что приложение доступно из описания профиля @modemorph_ai_bot33%
Нет, не знаю и не знаю что за канал0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 26 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 233,880 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mode morph:AI-гардероб и умные покупки” (@modemorph), 176 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/modemorph.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
