Изменили немного полувагон) И да...вот так мы и работаем😂😂 минутка из обычной смены, без постановки)
🔥4❤1

Channel
@modelwood
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
320subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002154112137 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @modelwood |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/modelwood |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 320 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 322 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 322 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:50 | 323 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 19 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
218 reactions across 11 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 72 | 33.0% | |
| 🔥 | 65 | 29.8% | |
| ❤ | 41 | 18.8% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 5.05% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 2.75% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 2.29% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.83% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 1.38% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.38% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.917% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 0.917% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.459% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.459% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.459% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.459% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2025 to 27 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Изменили немного полувагон) И да...вот так мы и работаем😂😂 минутка из обычной смены, без постановки)
🔥4❤1
Показывать ли здесь Автомобили и другие наши работы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Пока все ждали новых локомотивов наши технологи сделали фуры🙄😂 Интересны ли вам такие наши работы, или сделать отдельный канал для них? Ну и напоминаем, что НГ близко, уже вовсю принимаем заказы 😏
👍7❤3
Наш заказчик поделился своим креативом) Как вам?
🔥19🤩4❤3👍2
Да знаем, мы знаем....))) но ИИ видит вагонника почему-то так😂😂 А реальные фото мы по понятным причинам не можем использовать... Открыть вам комменты для ваших фото? Ставьте лайки, если хотите похвастать и мы сделаем галерею...а там может и разыграем чего..😏
🔥7❤1
Фухфухфух....было сложно, но мы успели всем все доделать💪 И ещё успеваем поздравить! Дорогие вагонники! Поздравляем вас с профессиональным праздником — Днём работников вагонного хозяйства! Спасибо за ваш нелёгкий, но важнейший труд — за техническую надёжность вагонов, бесперебойную эксплуатацию и безопасность перевозок. Желаем здоровья, энергии, оптимизма и удачи во всех делах! Пусть каждый ваш рабочий день идёт «по…
🎉4❤2👏2👍1
🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победитель: 1. неВаня (@KaBe_2) ✔️Проверить результаты
❤6👏3🗿3🤷♂2
Как написала одна из наших заказчиц: Я честно говоря просто в восторге!!! Ювелирная работа, все детали подвижны: колёсные пары, сцепки и даже снизу вагона подвижные детали под выгрузку грузов как у настоящих вагонов!!! Все мелочи соблюдены!!! Это подарок начальнице в память об отделе службы вагонного хозяйства, я думаю она будет в восторге!!! Разыгрываем🎉🎉 хоппер-впм 770! Искренне верим что он принесет победителю т…
🔥19👍5❤3🙏2
Кто хочет вагончик в подарок?) Ставьте лайки и устроим розыгрыш😏 Просто так, потому что мы вас любим😘
👍45❤22🔥4❤🔥1🎉1👏1🤪1🫡1
РЖД 😎 #нашилокомотивы@modelwood #Примерыбрендирования@modelwood
👍12👏4🔥3🤩2
Несколько человек написали... Не сразу поняли что на первой фотографии реальный вагон а не наша модель 🙄😆😆 А мы начинаем потихоньку готовиться к 3 июля - дню вагонника. Заказов будет много, сроки изготовления увеличатся, так что не тяните с заказом! 😏
😁3👌1
Казалось бы, все просто - модель такого хоппера уже есть, надо повторить окрас. Но...дьявол кроется в мелочах😈 Нестандартный и довольно сложный заказ получился, тем интереснее было его делать. Как считаете, мы справились?😏 #нашивагончики@modelwood
🔥9💯4👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @modelwood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Показывать ли здесь Автомобили и другие наши работы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2025 to 27 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЖД и Авто модели Корпоративный подарок Красивая упаковка” (@modelwood), 320 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/modelwood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.