Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Quien si no yo?

Channel

Quien si no yo?

@mo_mari_mo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

30subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002885881554
TypeChannel
Username@mo_mari_mo
DescriptionКанал автора Mo_Mari17 https://ficbook.net/authors/4083714 🫆
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mo_mari_mo

Growth

308 August 2026 — 30 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29–31 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:4730no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:4730first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 27 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.3%
avg views ÷ 30 subscribers
Avg views / post
7.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
28.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held12 (27 March 202610 August 2026)
Views total7
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
46
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 11 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3420.4%
🤡2816.8%
❤‍🔥2313.8%
🔥2112.6%
💩148.38%
🎉74.19%
💊63.59%
🥴63.59%
🍓52.99%
42.40%
💋42.40%
💔42.40%
💘42.40%
🥰21.20%
🍾10.599%
👎10.599%
💯10.599%
😍10.599%
😐10.599%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 11 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mo_mari_mo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 March 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC7 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

«Я просто хочу поспать, или будни пациентки из палаты №137» 😭 Сменив очередной раз работу в начале лета и очень некстати сместив свой отпуск в лучшем случае на полгода, в худшем — на год, я каждое утро просыпалась с мыслью: «Как же я хочу спать!»😔 И вот Вселенная услышала мои молитвы, но то ли я не так молилась, то ли что… 💅 Короче, в ближайшие пару дней я могу спать, читать и проходить кр, сколько душе моей будет

1💔1

7 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC52 views9 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

👻🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️ 🤩мя Мора высветилось на дисплее телефона. Закусывая губу в улыбке, Робин провела пальчиком по экрану, перевела на громкую связь: — Привет, ты скоро? — Привет, — ответно раздалось в трубке. На фоне играла музыка и слышались голоса людей. — Мы с коллегами решили в бар зайти, не теряй, ладно? ♥️ «Яд под кожу»

3🔥3🥰2😍1

18 Jun 2026, 17:43 UTC69 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

👻👻Хороший вопрос и интересная тема для обсуждения До недавних времен у меня был даже сгружен кр на телефоне примерно с 2021/22 года. 🫣 😲 Я была в творческом реахабе и писала тс по капле в день. Потом что-то пошло не так, и прекрасная фурия ворвалась в мою жизнь, и вот я уже восю прохожу «Иллюзию славы» и даже написала Клара и Хлою. 😊 После случилась гиперфиксация на другую историю, ну и вот… Но в черновиках лежит

❤‍🔥32🍓2🔥1

17 Jun 2026, 06:33 UTC66 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

А что говорить то? Ну 🔤🔤🔤 🤣 Ладно, шутки в сторону😄 🔤🔤🔤, или как это будет звучать на испанском, который я, кстати, учу уже год: Feliz cumpleaños para mí!🥳 Да-да, именинный торт с охренеть каким большим количеством свечей сегодня для меня. 31 — это вам не шутки… Есть ли смысл подводить итоги? Наверное, нет. Но могу сказать одно: если бы я из июня прошлого года и я из июня этого года сели бы и поговорили, мы бы

🎉4💋3❤‍🔥2🔥2🍾1

28 May 2026, 16:38 UTC71 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @kaleidoscope_of_stories

❌ 🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼 🌓🌓🌓🌓🌓🌓 ❌❤️🌓отим напомнить, что у нас есть рубрики для пиара Вас и Ваших историй: ❌❗️🌓екомендуем — анонс Вашей работы в прайм-тайм❤️ ❌❗️🌓накомимся ближе (#знакомимсяближе) — рассказ о себе и своём творческом пути в свободной форме❤️❤️ ❌❗️🌓т автора (#отавтора) — мотивационные посты и писательские лайфхаки❤️ ❌⚡️ чтобы поучаствовать, ждём Вас в личных сообщениях основного кан

🔥32❤‍🔥2

16 May 2026, 08:07 UTC98 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔊🔊🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🔊🔊 — 😎ет, Джейкоб, мы не будем это обсуждать! — твердо, но без злости ответила Робин. Помолчав и все так же тяжело дыша в трубку, он выдал: — Он сейчас рядом… там с тобой? — Нет, Мора нет, я одна, Джейк, — капитулирует она и садится на пол у окна. 🤩 «Яд под кожу»

3❤‍🔥3🔥3💔2

2 May 2026, 14:32 UTC89 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

👻🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 💙ченому стало не по себе от того, как лучший друг на него смотрит, он поежился, то ли от пронизывающего ветра, то ли от тяжести его взгляда. Миндалевидное тело, чувствуя опасность, начало пускать импульсы, сглотнув тревогу, он непонимающе ответил: — Не знаю, розы.. — Робин не любит розы. — звучит резко и даже грубо, осуждающе. — Откуда ты знаешь? — холодно и отстраненно спросил Джейк, склонив голову вбо

4❤‍🔥3🍓3🔥1

19 Apr 2026, 07:00 UTC85 views6 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

👻🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔠на шагнула ему на встречу, не зная, как поступить: обнять или молча протянуть подарок. Мор облегчил ей задачу, его рука легла на ее талию, мягко притянула к себе, холодные губы коснулись горячей щеки, и задержались там дольше положенного, а после ухо обжог горячий шёпот: — Ты невероятно красивая… 👻👻👻🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 «Яд под кожу»

22❤‍🔥2

6 Apr 2026, 09:03 UTC160 views14 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

👻👻👻🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 👻⬆️↗️↘️⬇️↙️⬅️↖️➡️ Ровно шесть лет назад я поставила точку в своей первой истории… ну как точку… 👻«Черное сердце»🖤 Моя первая работа, которая выходила с такой частотой, что я завидую тогдашней самой себе. Я осилила этот «макси» на 141 страницу аж за месяц. Продуктивность и вдохновение, вы где?🥹 Спасибо всем читателям, которые прошли со мной этот непростой путь, именно вы были вдохновлением и мотивацие

6🔥4🎉3💋1

28 Mar 2026, 11:11 UTC172 views38 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026

Реакции на канале улетели куда-то в атмосферу. Хотела ли я этого? Нет. Пиариться за чужой счёт? Тоже нет. Прошу заметить: я не оскорбляла автора, не пыталась усомниться в его таланте или как-то принизить его, как это делают её читатели. Я не поставила ни на одно сообщение реакции вроде 💩🤡 Да, я язвительна и саркастична, и я имею на это право 😉 Путь, который я прошла, знает только моя подружка,💅 и не дай бог вам х

13🤡10💩5💘4🔥4🥴2

27 Mar 2026, 22:08 UTCviews —

Quien si no yo? pinned «Чтож… О КАК… Прям хочется говорить мемами) У меня спиздили фанфик, но я не могу это доказать))) Ситуация — сюр или разбудите меня нахуй! Пишу по горячке, честно, давление скакануло, болит голова. Больная извечная тема: не спиздили, а вдохновились)))…»

27 Mar 2026, 21:34 UTC99 views49 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @im_still_loving_youPhoto

❌🌓мертельный 🌓иом. ❌🌓дохновились? ❌🌓акая удобная и интересная ситуация произошла в сегодняшней обнове СХС💅 ❌🌓🌓 января 2026 Маша Mo_Mari17 выкладывает на фикбуке историю Яд под кожу. Фандом непопулярный, статистика так себе, но вау, 25.01 (два месяца назад) историю замечает Вера, сценаристка Биома. Это повседневное AU, в котором никогда не было зомби-апокалипсиса, зато был Джейк, его девушка Робин и его лучший друг

🤡18💩9❤‍🔥8💊6🥴4👎1💔1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @mo_mari_mo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,300,636 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Quien si no yo?” (@mo_mari_mo), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mo_mari_mo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.