Channel
@mo0nb0y
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
112subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002181226506 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mo0nb0y |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 4 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mo0nb0y |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 112 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 114 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 114 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 113 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
133 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 36.8% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 30.1% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 13.5% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 4.51% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 3.76% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.01% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.26% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.50% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.50% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.752% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.752% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.752% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.752% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2024 to 22 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет 👋 Я давно думал о своих вредных привычках, и моя цель бросить всегда остаётся со мной 😵 У меня было 5+ попыток бросить курить 🚬 С алкоголем проблем никогда не было 🍷 И тут меня посетила мысль сделать мини интервью с криптанами за которыми я слежу в моём инфополе, поэтому ловите ЧАСТЬ 1 🔥 https://teletype.in/@tonbnb/88VDhScdi1Y#WywP 50+ реакций и я делаю следующую часть, будет еще много известных гос…
🔥25👍13❤9
BTC идет вверх, щитки нет, что делать? Скорее всего надо просто качать скилы, держать всё в деде, и не рыпаться, рынок не понятный, еще бы ставочку на Трампа сделал бы, и всё 🚀
🤣2
FTX бэкнут ура У меня там 500$ где то новость
👍3
всё по дефолту, гемблим гайс
На мейн дали 1900 На твинки насыпало ~1200-1500 Покушаем немного с хомяка йоу
Зафиксил сегодня $CATI по 1.04$
Единственное, что я могу сказать и посоветовать, дальше нормально насыпят только 2 проекта: 1. Pocket Fi 2. Hot Эти проекты объединяет абсолютно прозрачная токеномика, где процесс майнинга записывается полностью в блокчейн, все транзакции клеймы в блокчейне и вы можете их посмотреть В этих проектах проходят халвинги и они билдят реально классную экосистему со своей инфраструктурой, без каких-либо обещаний и влажн…
Делитесь резами , у меня 614 токенов, думаю 500$ забрать, хоть так
❤2
🪂🪂🪂🪂 Снепшот CATIZEN уже завтра! 🚀 14 сентября в 00:00 UTC в CATIZEN будет произведен SNAPSHOT и приложение уйдет на техническое обслуживание. 14 сентября в 10:00 UTC каждый сможет узнать, какое количество $CATI они получили 🪙 Вместе с этим будет запущена механика стейкинга монет 💰 15 сентября в 10:00 UTC будет доступна подача заявок на вывод на CEX биржи 😍 Какой у вас лвл?
❤3
🤑 Binance Labs инвестирует в Blum Прошла официальная новость, что бинанс инвестит в блюм, уверен со 100%-ой вероятностью, что это будет самый крупный и хайп дроп Кого еще нет вы упускаете ноубрейн возможность заработать много, залетайте «тык» 🤑
❤1
Пакет намекает на старт и запуск мемпада в эту пятницу 13 числа Дроп и листинг их токенов $SWITCH в Q4 Залетаем в мемпад, думаю покетфай это андерадар гем https://t.me/pocketfi_bot/BigPump?startapp=tonbnb_8456
❤3🔥2💯1
Йоуууу СРОЧНО ФАСТОМ ЗАЛЕТАЕМ Мое любимое казино Whale, где проебал дохуя денег раздаёт 10% эмиссии своего токена в тапалке https://t.me/wheelofwhalesbot?start=inv:2v6XYEQV Быстрее залетайте 100% покормит, людей пока мало надо лететь на всех порах https://t.me/wheelofwhalesbot?start=inv:2v6XYEQV
🔥3👌1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mo0nb0y. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 581,277 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“O’din” (@mo0nb0y), 112 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mo0nb0y.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.