3 measurements spanning 10 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 942–965 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 16:01
945
-15
3 Sept 2026, 01:24
960
-2
2 Sept 2026, 01:15
962
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 27 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,036 reactions across 10 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🥰
268
25.9%
❤🔥
159
15.3%
custom 5291977811270057924
145
14.0%
💋
136
13.1%
🔥
78
7.53%
custom 5292203511801461667
74
7.14%
custom 5291996666176487297
63
6.08%
custom 5290021702774833241
30
2.90%
💘
22
2.12%
🤩
20
1.93%
😍
14
1.35%
🏆
11
1.06%
💯
10
0.965%
👌
6
0.579%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,036 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2025 to 30 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mnijungkook77. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2025 to 30 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#JKвоспоминания
Помните, как старший брат Чонгука опубликовал стихотворение, которое малыш Гуки написал, когда ему было 6 лет?
Посмотрите… обведённая часть на самом деле была ошибкой. Но Чонгук не стал её стирать, а просто набросал поверх и разрисовал, пока она не стала похожа на часть рисунка. С самого детства он был таким гениальным и креативным. Явный признак того, что у ребёнка с самого детства была творческая …
МЫ ДОЖДАЛИСЬ!!!🥺
ЧОНГУКИИИИ ТЫ ГДЕ ПРОПАДАЛ😭
Итак…
Во-1, наконец то наш мужчина объявился 😍
Во-2, хотя бы кусочек, хотя бы так увидеть продолжение татушечки😍
Бодибилдер Ма Сон Хо опубликовал фотографию с Чонгуком в спортзале:
«Сегодня снова с JK…
Зачем тебе так усердствовать?
Тренировки продолжаются даже в Корее @/mnijungkook»
Он также использовал Seven в качестве фоновой музыки.
📈 #JKстатистика
Чонгук продолжает наращивать миллионы в инстаграм, не смотря на свою, практически нулевую активность в профиле. Сейчас на его аккаунте в Instagram уже более 9,5 миллионов подписчиков! 👑🔥🎉
KINGKOOK IS SLAYING 🥵👌
📈 #JKстатистика
🎶 «Hate You» и «Yes or No» достигли 100 МИЛЛИОНОВ прослушиваний на YouTube Music
— это 4-й и 5-й треки из альбома GOLDEN 💿достигшие этой отметки 🔥
— заняли 8-е и 9-е места в списке самых прослушиваемых аудиотреков Чонгука на этой платформе 🔥
ПОЗДРАВЛЯЕМ НАШЕГО ЧОНГУКА 👑
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mnijungkook77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ᴊᴜɴɢᴋooᴋ | ʙᴛs⁷ 🪭 @jungkook_gallery · 23,315 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
ʙᴀᴇᴘsᴀᴇ | ʙᴛs⁷ 🪭 @BaepSae_BTS · 27,150 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
❤️🔥BTS TIME NEWS🗞 @btstimenews · 36,158 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JUNGKOOK • 전정국” (@mnijungkook77), 945 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mnijungkook77.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
