Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MONO. 🕷

@mmonoo17

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

405subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002004034687
TypeChannel
Username@mmonoo17
Description✦Рисую и иногда леплю из глины. 👻✦ ✦ТикТок✦Ютуб✦Вк✧mmono17✦ ✦Инста✧mmono_17✦ ✦Щитпост✧ @circus_mono✦
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mmonoo17

Growth

4056 Aug 2026, 07:06 — 405 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:33 — 405 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 07:066 Aug 2026, 19:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 404–406 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:33405no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:06405first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 6 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 405 subscribers
Avg views / post
95.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
35.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held11 (6 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total286
Reactions total100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
378
Videos
6
Links
13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

513 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 542928530008809319816432.0%
15730.6%
custom 52832491105796918319718.9%
custom 5280622480380160791438.38%
custom 5287325124737913951275.26%
custom 5195417274189632040112.14%
custom 617926887295313954991.75%
custom 532573213534298622740.78%
custom 541117890337913582210.195%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 513reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
41
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 11 we hold a reading for · 91%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mmonoo17. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC48 views33 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💙✨🎀✨ ✨✨✨✨✨ #скетч #традиш

19custom 542928530008809319814

1 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC88 views32 reactions4 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌟Много скетчей с клоунами не бывает. 🌟 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️ Еще спасибо за звездочки под прошлым и этим постом.🌟 #скетч #традиш

custom 52832491105796918311910custom 52806224803801607913

25 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC150 views35 reactions6 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Немного занята была в последнее время и нарисовала только такой вот скетч, когда время появилось. 🐇 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Ещё спойлер к работе, который я кидала, дольше ждать придется, потому что я решила эту работу не в диджитал делать, а в традишке, и я только перенесла её на бумагу и буду красить её в ближайшее время уже.😐 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ #скетч #традиш

custom 542928530008809319821custom 617926887295313954986

12 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC279 views41 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Немного скетчевых голов. 🐇 ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ #скетч #традиш

21custom 542928530008809319815custom 53257321353429862274custom 52806224803801607911

9 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC271 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @silenthatchingPhoto

. сегодня у вашего автора день рождения 🧌 всем благодарен за то что так долго со мной и моими идеями 🖤 буду благодарен за репост работ 🦇 .°

custom 542928530008809319816

5 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC209 views37 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌸🌟 ➖➖➖➖ #спойлер

custom 542928530008809319820custom 528732512473791395196custom 52832491105796918312

30 Jun 2026, 19:02 UTC258 views52 reactions4 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

▫️Давно у меня лежал этот скетчевый покрас в традишке, и вот дошли руки наконец его доработать в диже.🐇▫️ #арт #дидж_традиш #ос

custom 52832491105796918312613custom 542928530008809319811custom 52806224803801607911custom 52873251247379139511

22 Jun 2026, 18:22 UTC313 views68 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

♣️♣️♣️♣️♣️♣️♣️♣️♣️ Иногда фальшь кажется ярче реальности. Но это лишь оболочка. ♣️♣️♣️♣️♣️♣️♣️♣️♣️ #арт #традиш #моно

custom 528324911057969183135custom 54292853000880931981715custom 54111789033791358221

16 Jun 2026, 08:38 UTC374 views73 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💪🤩💪 ♣️♣️♣️♣️♣️ #арт #моно #традиш

44custom 528732512473791395113custom 519541727418963204011custom 54292853000880931983custom 52806224803801607911custom 61792688729531395491

8 Jun 2026, 11:20 UTC339 views68 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

✨🦋✨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨ #традиш #скетч

custom 542928530008809319835custom 52832491105796918311514custom 52873251247379139514

6 Jun 2026, 09:57 UTC288 views58 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔴🔴 Связь, 🌹 🌹что нас объединяла,🌹 🌹 теперь — лишь 🌹 🌫️ воспоминание.🌹🌹 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 #традиш #моно #арт

custom 528062248038016079137custom 5429285300088093198129

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mmonoo17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 240,702 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MONO. 🕷” (@mmonoo17), 405 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmonoo17.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.