13 measurements spanning 12 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,041–19,135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 22:42
19,052
-4
16 Aug 2026, 21:28
19,056
-8
15 Aug 2026, 15:45
19,064
-9
14 Aug 2026, 03:06
19,073
-6
12 Aug 2026, 22:07
19,079
-13
12 Aug 2026, 00:02
19,092
-7
10 Aug 2026, 23:25
19,099
-3
10 Aug 2026, 00:29
19,102
-7
8 Aug 2026, 23:01
19,109
-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:58
19,112
-4
7 Aug 2026, 00:01
19,116
-8
6 Aug 2026, 02:15
19,124
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:04
19,124
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,545 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,138
44.7%
❤
634
24.9%
😢
431
16.9%
👎
125
4.91%
😐
82
3.22%
👏
46
1.81%
😱
44
1.73%
😍
22
0.864%
😁
20
0.786%
🤔
3
0.118%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,545reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
همگی ما از دنیا، شرایط زندگی و نیز از کسانی که به آنها اعتماد کردهایم زخم خوردهایم.
اگر کسی مورد خیانت واقع شده باشد، اعتماد کردن برایش سخت خواهد شد.
تجربهٔ عمیق خیانت منجر به پارانویا، یعنی تعمیم فقدان میشود. یعنی ممکن است از یک گربه خاطره بدی داشته باشیم و این خاطره را به تمام گربههای دنیا تعمیم دهیم. یا با یک رابطه خاطره و اندوه و آسیب سنگینی دریافت کنیم و این را به تمام روابط دنیا تعمیم دهیم. یا دچار الگوی …
وقتی نفس عمیق میکشیم، انگار دست میاندازیم به آن پایینهای ریه، آن ته، قعر و مقداری هوای بهجامانده و مطرود و سنگین را بیرون میکشیم.
چند ثانیه سبک میشویم. کاش میشد دست انداخت و آنجایی که در کلهی آدم پر از باتلاق و خستگی و فکر است، یعنی آن ته را پیدا کرد، آنجا که قیرگون و رسوب شده، بیرون آورد
و بقول هدایت انداخت جلو سگ.
#معین_دهاز
وقتی به نقشهی تاریخ نگاه میکنی، ایران نباید وجود داشته باشه؛
اما چرا همچنان هست؟
زمانی که اعراب، تیسفون رو گرفتن و
امپراتوری ساسانی با اون شکوه و جلال
فرو ریخت، سکوتی دویستساله بر لبان
ما نشست که مورخان به اون
دو قرن سکوت میگن؛
اما در اوج ناامیدی
فردوسی برخاست تا زبان فارسی رو از
گزند بیگانگان حفظ کنه.
زمانی که اسکندر مقدونی تخت جمشید
رو به آتش کشید، اون شب هر ایرانی
فکر میکرد که پایان تاریخ فرا رسیده
و ما ب…
مجری حروم لقمه خبرگزاری دانشجو: خداروشکر تو اینستاگرام همه فاز غم گرفتن، حداقل این بلاگرا فعالیت نمیکنن و مردم زندگی راحت تر و بی دغدغه تری دارن، همینطوری به عزاداری کردن ادامه بدید!😐
@mmoltames
تاریخ، تعداد مردگاناش را رُند میکند.
هزار و یک نفر، تبدیل میشود به هزار نفر، گویی آن یک نفر، هرگز وجود نداشته است؛
یک جنین خیالی، یک گهوارهی خالی، کتاب الفبایی که برای کسی باز نبود
هوا بود که میخندید، گریه میکرد، بزرگ میشد. خلاء بود که از پلهها پایین میدوید و به طرف باغ میرفت. در میان صف، جایی برای هیچکس بود.
ویسواوا شیمبورسکا
@mmoltames
بعدها، به یاد خواهی آورد که عشق و آزادی در این سرزمین ارث پدری نبود که نسل به نسل به ما برسد. ما نهالِ عشق و آزادی را در کف خیابانها، در آسفالت و خون کاشتیم.
@mmoltames
این زمستان ، برفش از شقایق بود.
خونِ جاویدنامانمان روی زمین، یک بهارِ نافرجام را نقاشی کرد.
هر قطره، شعری نوشت که باد، خط خطیش کرد...
گفته بودند خون گرم است و یخ نمیزند
اما یخ زد
نبض تپنده ی ماهم یخ زد وقتی
کفن مثل مه شهر ها را سفید کرد
شهیدان، ستارگانی شدند که
روی شانه هایم سنگینی میکنند
برخلاف آنچیزی که مداوما سعی دارند به شما بگویند، شما بیارزش نیستید، شما ناتوان نیستید، شما کم نیستید و کوچکترین کارهایتان ممکن است نتایج بزرگی داشته باشد.
@mmoltames
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mmoltames. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,059,359 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“التماس تفکر” (@mmoltames), 19,052 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmoltames.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.