Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ОБИТЕЛЬ БИОХАКИНГА | by Artex®

Channel

ОБИТЕЛЬ БИОХАКИНГА | by Artex®

@mm201v2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,607subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002551338826
TypeChannel
Username@mm201v2
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mm201v2

Growth

1,6071,6171,6127 August 2026 — 1,617 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,617 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,612 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,608 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,607 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,606–1,619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:141,607-1
11 Aug 2026, 18:541,608-4
8 Aug 2026, 09:371,612-5
7 Aug 2026, 16:481,617no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:311,617first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 9 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 41s
Average length
4m 41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

297 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9532.0%
💯6622.2%
🔥4715.8%
👍299.76%
❤‍🔥237.74%
124.04%
custom 5339207977486272897113.70%
💊72.36%
👏31.01%
🤩20.673%
custom 543376739481422249210.337%
🫡10.337%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 297reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
120
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 13 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
102
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mm201v2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 January 2026 to 17 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Feb 2026, 16:49 UTC≈1,870 views83 reactions15 Starsread 7 August 2026

Доброго времени суток! Вопрос к вам. Сделать ли устойчивый к блокировкам, без логов и с полнодисковым шифрованием кастомный VPN (shadowsocks-2022/VLESS XHTTP/REALITY и иные варианты) для вас? Думаю если делать, то будет бесплатным для пользователей приватного канала, который сейчас в разработке. P.S обратную связь можно дать в виде звёзд и реакций.

💯5710custom 533920797748627289710🔥6

12 Feb 2026, 05:05 UTC≈2,280 views39 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ave, читатели! В тему деградации интернета. Я уже долгое время варюсь в теме контент-мейкинга и последнее время замечаю очень печальную ИИсторию. Мы все уже привыкли к контенту нейросетей в медиа, социальных сетях, учебных заведениях, да даже в правительстве и больницах... Нейросети действительно полезный и эффективный инструмент для поиска и структуризации информации, для новостных каналов (по типу Черного Треуго

25💯5👍4🔥3custom 53392079774862728971custom 54337673948142224921

11 Feb 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,560 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Доброго времени суток! Чуть менее двух месяцев назад у моего уважаемого коллеги по ЦЕХу Артура Шарифова (@sharifovprompts) вышел крайне интересный и важный ролик, где он разобрал тему воздействия коротких роликов (alya tiktok) на наше восприятие и разум. Очень подробно, качественно и что самое главное - понятно Рекомендую к просмотру. https://youtu.be/CJ0okar9ALI?si=R21tMvBHjch6YWM9 И Я, даже делая этот пост - с

❤‍🔥7🔥1

10 Feb 2026, 17:17 UTC≈1,400 views28 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Из прошлогодних заметок Арсена в соцсети X: "Две недели без мобильного интернета могут радикально изменить вашу жизнь и превзойти антидепресанты по эффективности В этом году экономисты из американского университета провели амбициозный эксперимент. Они предложили участникам выключить мобильный интернет на две недели - просто заблокировать его на уровне оператора. Никаких социальных сетей, YouTube, мессенджеров. Все

❤‍🔥135🔥5👍41

10 Feb 2026, 16:22 UTC≈1,180 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤬😀😯😜🫠😀😓😜😖

🔥3❤‍🔥2

Signed PremiumFleep

10 Feb 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,630 views31 reactions102 Starsread 7 August 2026

Продолжая тему..... Временный отказ от интернета как детокс или почему вы должны попробовать аскезу от интернета. В первую очередь, мы должны для себя определить, от чего же мы и для чего отказываемся/воздерживаемся. Тут я выделяю два варианта развития событий: 1. Полный отказ от сети, без исключений. 2. Частичный отказ от сети - отказ от социальных сетей (первостепенно), мессенджеров, брейнрота и коротких роликов

16👍4💊4👏3🔥21🤩1

10 Feb 2026, 07:00 UTC≈2,180 views41 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Жизнеутверждающая База | Как БЕСПЛАТНО лечить депрессию/тревогу или проще — как жить эту ебаную жизнь? Сегодня нам предстоит серьёзный разговор, дорогой читатель. Я прекрасно вижу и понимаю, что Ты, читатель, читаешь мои посты, статьи, смотришь трансляции, скорее всего в надежде изменить собственную жизнь и решить свои проблемы. Возможно, даже достичь поставленных целей. Возможно Ты думаешь, что у тебя есть заболев

17🔥10👍9💯41

4 Feb 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,670 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пчёлы, мёд, здоровье и сила. Ave, читающие. Сегодня я бы хотел поведать вам (а кому-то и напомнить) про забытый некогда ПОЛЕЗНЕЙШИЙ продукт, который найти настоящий и чистый сейчас практически невозможно. С одной стороны, каждый из вас этот продукт ел и возможно, даже лечился с помощью него. С другой стороны, практически никто из вас не пробовал настоящий и чистый — мёд. «Из брюшков пчёл исходит питьё разных цветов

🔥1154💊3❤‍🔥1🤩1🫡1

2 Feb 2026, 17:41 UTC≈1,470 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Долго спал Заратустра, и не только утренняя заря, но и час дополуденный прошли по лицу его. Но наконец он открыл глаза: с удивлением посмотрел Заратустра на лес и тишину, с удивлением заглянул он внутрь самого себя. Потом он быстро поднялся, как мореплаватель, завидевший внезапно землю, и возликовал: ибо он увидел новую истину. И так говорил он тогда в сердце своём: «Свет низошёл на меня: мне нужны спутники, и прито

8🔥4👍3

9 Jan 2026, 18:40 UTC≈2,270 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Иллюстрация Туммо (среднего качества)

8👍5🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mm201v2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 763,164 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОБИТЕЛЬ БИОХАКИНГА | by Artex®” (@mm201v2), 1,607 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mm201v2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.