Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

mlowy

@mlowytarot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

218subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002408028555
TypeChannel
Username@mlowytarot
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mlowytarot

Growth

218219218.56 Aug 2026, 23:30 — 219 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:30 — 219 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:31 — 218 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:307 Aug 2026, 04:31
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 218–219 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 04:31218-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:30219no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:30219first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.5%
avg views ÷ 218 subscribers
Avg views / post
81.8
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
40.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,635
Reactions total630
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

630 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 524492613530472582834855.2%
custom 538886596416085922515124.0%
custom 53978348179475949488914.1%
custom 5395547893891365942426.67%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 630reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 00:20 UTC19 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

рандомное наблюдение почти все мои клиенты настаивают смотреть то, что я бы не советовала хахахах, потому что обычно это просто вопросы из интереса или на авось но мне пох, я уже на всё что можно согласна, главное помогает

custom 53888659641608592257custom 53978348179475949484custom 53955478938913659423

4 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC141 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

напоминаю 🩶

custom 524492613530472582830custom 538886596416085922528

1 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC164 views66 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ещё меня мощно отточили в работе с таро на житейскую основу и магический негатив и я ежедневно прокачиваюсь с наставницей в работе с раскладами в целом это не может не радовать

custom 524492613530472582841custom 539783481794759494814custom 538886596416085922511

1 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC162 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026

до этого всего никто в меня не верил, никто меня не поддерживал, я была в абсолютном говне одна и я очень благодарна жизни за этот путь это сейчас ко мне тянутся люди с прошлого, но за душой у них нихуя нет особенно когда неверие в мою деятельность перешло в просьбы о помощи, в целом база для многих практиков

custom 524492613530472582843custom 538886596416085922514custom 539783481794759494812

1 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC117 views66 reactionsread 7 August 2026

эзотерика, практика, работа с людьми в этой области всё это сделало меня по-настоящему счастливой и вывело на правильный жизненный путь и предназначение я благодарна себе за здравый рассудок и умение жить нормально, прости господи

custom 524492613530472582840custom 539783481794759494814custom 538886596416085922512

1 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC104 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я за полгода в эзотерическом блоге успела получить в свою жизнь человека, который активно пытается ставить на меня крадники и выгнать с этой ниши вот так собственно выглядят проблемы с головой, тем более когда работы не по справедливости и не проходят ко мне я никуда не уйду, это моё любимое дело, в которое я очень сильно вложилась и буду вкладываться, а также испытываю очень сильную любовь к людям, которые меня иск

custom 524492613530472582843custom 53888659641608592256

30 Jul 2026, 11:29 UTC88 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я смотрю у большинства просмотры в тт сдохли, как и у меня 🫠 но всё равно продолжу постить, у меня появилось за всё это время слишком много полезных вещей для вас

custom 524492613530472582840custom 53888659641608592255

30 Jul 2026, 10:07 UTC87 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

подробный анализ отношений – чувства, намерения, действия? – перспективы на короткий срок? – перспективы на долгий срок? – проблемы, которые могут вас рассорить? – как решить их? – вероятность измены? – ваше самоощущение в этих отношениях? – самоощущение партнёра в них? после данного расклада вы сможете направить свои отношения и в целом свою жизнь в благоприятную сторону, выбрав для себя лучший путь и наконец-то в

custom 524492613530472582830custom 538886596416085922515custom 539554789389136594211

29 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC80 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

раскладики на любовь и всё остальное выложу завтра из-за нагрузки, поэтому такая цена останется ещё на послезавтра, всех лю 🩶

custom 524492613530472582833custom 53888659641608592255

29 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC96 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩

custom 524492613530472582820custom 538886596416085922511custom 53978348179475949488

29 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC93 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

по такой стоимости можно записаться на все расклады до 08.08 а когда производить оплату и делать их – уже сможете решить сами

custom 538886596416085922516custom 539554789389136594214custom 539783481794759494810

29 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC92 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

также хочу напомнить, что я всегда могу подобрать качественные вопросы именно под вашу ситуацию, которые к тому же можно наложить на вышеперечисленные

custom 539783481794759494811custom 52449261353047258286custom 53888659641608592255

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mlowytarot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,006,532 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mlowy” (@mlowytarot), 218 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mlowytarot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.