Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Рест Mallet cr

@mlltsnr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

45subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002605209296
TypeChannel
Username@mlltsnr
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mlltsnr

Growth

454645.511 Aug 2026, 18:01 — 46 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 01:38 — 45 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 18:0112 Aug 2026, 01:38
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45–46 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:3845-1
11 Aug 2026, 18:0146first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘3345.8%
💋3041.7%
custom 533278740510567665579.72%
custom 533501714167236298122.78%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2025, 01:19 UTC116 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Чет у меня ваще сил нет на видео это пиздец

💋3💘2

28 Dec 2025, 08:18 UTC167 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

??

  1. Каин30%
  2. Ксандр37%
  3. Амрит33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Dec 2025, 21:20 UTC132 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Подписалась на всех, кто отметился

💋4

26 Dec 2025, 11:14 UTC99 viewsread 11 August 2026

Подпишусь обратно завтра (кто опоздает тоже могу позже подписаться)

26 Dec 2025, 11:12 UTC95 viewsread 11 August 2026

🧠🫲💪👄🖖❤️ В коменты под этим постом пишите свои ники, больше ничего не нужно Пока что от всех отпишусь, по окончании чистки подпишусь на тех, кто отметится От рестников отписываться не буду , можете не отмечаться

25 Dec 2025, 19:10 UTC93 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

две ненормальные фанатки кр сломали жизнь пропердолине!!! случилось это все из за картошки. сейчас лариса переживает кризис из за нехватки картошки.

💋1💘1

25 Dec 2025, 19:07 UTC100 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

new video 🙈 #даниэль #ларисадолина Буду рада репостам и активу 😂 Извинитесь

💘8💋6

23 Dec 2025, 16:33 UTC114 viewsread 11 August 2026

Мьюши киньте свои ники в комменты, я чищу каналы могу случайно отписаться 😍

21 Dec 2025, 10:47 UTC134 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ребят ну это реально две капли воды

💘3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mlltsnr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Dec 2025, 08:18 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

??

  1. Каин30%
  2. Ксандр37%
  3. Амрит33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Dec 2025, 13:23 UTCAnonymous Poll69 voters

??

  1. Ашриэль52%
  2. Ян23%
  3. Ксандр10%
  4. Сайлен14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 31 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 939,852 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рест Mallet cr” (@mlltsnr), 45 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mlltsnr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.