📚 МУКАРРАР «МАДДАТ УЛЬ-АКЫДА» «Утверждённый курс по вероубеждению» Полезный учебный материал по вопросам исламского вероубеждения, подготовленный под руководством Комитета по делам призыва в Африке и Королевстве Саудовская Аравия (КСА). 📖 Подойдёт для изучения основ ‘акыды и систематического получения знаний. 💳 Цена: 3 000 ₽ 🪶 Для оформления заказа писать: 📖 Мужчинам: @menedzherzalzalya 📖 женщинам: @sestramMK 📚…

Channel
مكتبة الزلزلة
@mkzalzalya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,038subscribers
+267 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001958762608 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mkzalzalya |
| Created | 10 July 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mkzalzalya |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 9,038 | -22 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 9,060 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 9,061 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:24 | 9,081 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 9,095 | -22 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 9,117 | -65 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 9,182 | +33 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 9,149 | +144 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 9,005 | +140 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 8,865 | +79 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 8,786 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 8,774 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 8,775 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 8,771 | first reading |
Engagement
61 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.2%
- avg views ÷ 9,038 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,100
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 61 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 61 (26 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,133 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 00s
- Average length
- 30s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Дарите правильные подарки 🎁
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم 📚 Новые подписчики нашей группы, добро пожаловать! Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с нашей группой по продаже книг издательства Maktabatu Zalzalya 📚 Здесь мы публикуем новинки, наличие и цены.
Сказал Суфьян ас-Саури رحمه الله: «Если до тебя дошёл тафсир от Муджахида — этого тебе достаточно».
Photo, posted without a caption
Результаты конкурса
📚 Подписывайтесь на канал издательства — здесь мы делимся полезными выдержками из книг, словами учёных и различными напоминаниями. https://t.me/maktabatuzalzalya
🏆 СЕГОДНЯ — ИТОГИ КОНКУРСА! Ин ша Аллах, уже сегодня подведём итоги нашего конкурса и определим победителей. 🎁📚 Если вы ещё не успели принять участие — обязательно ознакомьтесь с условиями конкурса и участвуйте!
Если ты увидишь книги саляфов — возможно, Аллах открыл тебе дверь к знанию именно через эту книгу.
И как же прекрасно сказал Ибн аль-Кайим, да помилует его Аллах: «Ты любишь врагов возлюбленного своего и утверждаешь при этом, что любишь его. Как же такое возможно? К тому же ты упорно враждуешь с его любимыми. Где же твоя любовь, о брат Шайтана?! Также сказал Язид Ибн аль-Хаким ас-Сакафи: «Ты любишь моего врага, а затем утверждаешь что ты мой друг. Нет в твоих поступках благоразумия». Из книги: Подарок братьям
Завтра 25 числа Ин ша Аллах стоп конкурса
📌 Шейх Салих аль-Фаузан, да хранит его Аллах, объясняет, что Посланник Аллаха ﷺ десять лет призывал только к таухиду, до того как были узаконены молитва, закят и остальные дела. Это показывает величайшую важность таухида, ведь без него не принимаются никакие дела. 💬 Канал: @maktabatuzalzalya
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @mkzalzalya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mkzalzalya edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 12 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 12 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой цвет вам больше нравится?
- ⚫ Чёрный57%
- 🔴 Красный43%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mutawwa · 45,655
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
@iqraskhool · 37,521
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
@hunafa111 · 29,395
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 9 September 2026
@Luhaiidan · 45,539
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
@soplemenic · 29,832
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 September 2026
@alistiqam · 22,364
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مكتبة الزلزلة” (@mkzalzalya), 9,038 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mkzalzalya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.