Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Michael's Kingdom

Channel

Michael's Kingdom

@mjworldof

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

129subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004351649744
TypeChannel
Username@mjworldof
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mjworldof

Growth

120129124.511 August 2026 — 121 subscribers11 August 2026 — 121 subscribers12 August 2026 — 120 subscribers20 August 2026 — 125 subscribers27 August 2026 — 129 subscribers11 August 202627 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 119–130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 05:53129+4
20 Aug 2026, 09:56125+5
12 Aug 2026, 14:44120-1
11 Aug 2026, 19:00121no change
11 Aug 2026, 18:51121first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91.6%
avg views ÷ 129 subscribers
Avg views / post
118
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held13 (1 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total945
Reactions total161
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

218 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53686410275885170185826.6%
custom 52988858108991432635022.9%
custom 52039495101909810862712.4%
custom 53980136346159909242411.0%
custom 5206673906731078637198.72%
custom 5366219838559630773198.72%
custom 5368616752433346707135.96%
🏆83.67%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC45 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🤍 💀💀💀💀 🤍

custom 53662198385596307737custom 52039495101909810864custom 52066739067310786373custom 53686410275885170181

9 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC92 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026

something wild is looming...

custom 529888581089914326310🏆5custom 52039495101909810863custom 53686410275885170181

9 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC94 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 520394951019098108611custom 52066739067310786375custom 53662198385596307733custom 52988858108991432631custom 53686410275885170181

8 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC131 views22 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 529888581089914326312custom 53980136346159909245custom 52066739067310786373custom 53686410275885170182

8 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC129 views22 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 536864102758851701813custom 53662198385596307734custom 52039495101909810863custom 52988858108991432632

7 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC126 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#WHITE #BBY #ANGEL 🪦

custom 53686410275885170189custom 53662198385596307733custom 53980136346159909243🏆2

7 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC135 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

...🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇 @

custom 536864102758851701810custom 52988858108991432635custom 52066739067310786374custom 52039495101909810861custom 53662198385596307731

3 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC193 views24 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вокруг того, что показывает нам Миша, все чаще стал проскакивать Эмбиент 🌟 Речь идет не о сниппетах, не о самих релизах, а о том, где именно начала появляться спокойная музыка. Эмбиент на мой взгляд задает ощущение времени и помещает внутрь происходящего, заставляя задуматься о чем-то более глубоком, побыть наедине со своими мыслями. Если раньше в его творчестве подобная атмосфера практически не фигурировала, то им

custom 529888581089914326313custom 53686410275885170185custom 53980136346159909245custom 53662198385596307731

1 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC186 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

АЛЬБОМ «МАЙКЛ ДЖЕКСОН» В 2027?

  1. Похоже на то47%
  2. Нет, в этом году дроп55%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC181 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 53686167524333467078custom 53686410275885170185custom 53980136346159909245🏆1

1 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC176 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52988858108991432637custom 53980136346159909245custom 52039495101909810864custom 53686167524333467072

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mjworldof. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTCAnonymous Poll78 voters

АЛЬБОМ «МАЙКЛ ДЖЕКСОН» В 2027?

  1. Похоже на то47%
  2. Нет, в этом году дроп55%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 887,887 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Michael's Kingdom” (@mjworldof), 129 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mjworldof.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.