Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

みずみ 🐼

@mizumidecapitated

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

219subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003814359298
TypeChannel
Username@mizumidecapitated
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mizumidecapitated

Growth

21910 Aug 2026, 13:04 — 219 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 02:41 — 219 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 13:0411 Aug 2026, 02:41
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 218–220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:41219no change
10 Aug 2026, 13:04219first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
99.0%
avg views ÷ 219 subscribers
Avg views / post
217
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held18 (22 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total3,902
Reactions total268
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

268 reactions across 18 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52967591750224245976323.5%
custom 54427655875225628073412.7%
custom 53463138462587043013312.3%
custom 53324655144867286022710.1%
custom 5208736478875642116197.09%
custom 5431425297608119842176.34%
custom 5350326788822180834165.97%
custom 5332516439913961926114.10%
custom 533258702770147146293.36%
custom 533246458677379209672.61%
custom 610941336018747856672.61%
custom 523363170275613600162.24%
custom 529677982522517448151.87%
custom 520882032952216243541.49%
custom 533505443916835854320.746%
custom 547194474492805873120.746%
custom 520897263765241418910.373%
custom 525796971046453961110.373%
custom 531008421656897818310.373%
custom 533266540655965675710.373%
2 further kinds20.746%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mizumidecapitated. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC41 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ainasplacePhoto

W𝑒𝑙𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑦 𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙 !! 🤩 ᴨᴩиʙᴇᴛиᴋ , я 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ᴏдᴇʙᴀюᴄь ʙ джиᴩᴀй и ᴄᴀбуᴋᴀᴩу , ʙ ϶ᴛᴏʍ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴇ ʙыᴋᴧᴀдыʙᴀю чᴀᴄᴛичᴋи ʍᴏᴇй жиɜни буду ᴩᴀдᴀ ᴛʙᴏᴇй ᴨᴏдᴨиᴄᴋᴇ!! 🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽 🍓ɜᴀхᴏди ʙ ᴦᴏᴄᴛи🍓 🍓мой тикток 🍓буст 🍓щп вп - 80+ , писать под этот пост

custom 54719447449280587312

7 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC82 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52088203295221624354custom 53503267888221808343custom 53325870277014714621

6 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC208 views43 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠୨♡୧◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠ ͏ ♥꒷꒥꒷˙🎀 あなたは私をむさぼり食うしたいですか?🥩🐼⑅ 🩸꒷꒦︶︶︶ (ɷ ꒪ཀ꒪)ɷ 🧠︶︶︶꒦꒷🩸 ◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡୨♡୧◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡

custom 520873647887564211619custom 533251643991396192610custom 53503267888221808347custom 52336317027561360015custom 52089726376524141891custom 53326654065596567571

5 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC151 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53325870277014714623

5 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC141 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

maybe....

custom 53325870277014714624custom 53503267888221808342

5 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @lovejsfPhoto

⊹ #летнийивент ♡ 𐬹𓏸 #lovejsf ◌יִ @lovejsf ◌ @lovejsfbot ˖ (обязательное оформление) скидывайте фотографию своей любимой жсф персоны вместе с летним предметом/едой с которыми он/а у вас ассоциируется! самая часто упоминаемая персона получит бесплатную рекламу у нас в канале. будут и другие призы! репосты приветствуются, пример тейка в комментариях. конец ивента 7 августа в 10.00 по мск.

custom 52336317027561360011custom 52579697104645396111custom 53325870277014714621

2 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC189 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

мя заебала эта песня и тренд.

custom 53324655144867286027custom 53463138462587043015

2 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC192 views31 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🥩🎀👹

custom 533246551448672860220custom 54427655875225628077custom 61094133601874785663custom 53100842165689781831

31 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC221 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

егор — разорен✅

custom 534631384625870430117custom 53324645867737920962custom 53325164399139619261

30 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTC211 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @yoruww

Ладно вру , мои любимости ещё конечно же Кико и Мизуми. Я туп , не написала родных

custom 543142529760811984210

30 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC231 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 529675917502242459717custom 54427655875225628077custom 53463138462587043014

30 Jul 2026, 00:00 UTC228 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ребято я сделала канал не по жсф тематике, если есть желание модете глянуть и сабнуца дааааа https://t.me/mizumiforever

custom 54314252976081198425

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mizumidecapitated. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 263,367 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“みずみ 🐼” (@mizumidecapitated), 219 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mizumidecapitated.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.