Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mixed by BABYBEAR

Channel

Mixed by BABYBEAR

@mixed_by_babybear

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

834subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001986864816
TypeChannel
Username@mixed_by_babybear
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mixed_by_babybear

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

801834817.57 August 2026 — 810 subscribers8 August 2026 — 810 subscribers14 August 2026 — 808 subscribers21 August 2026 — 807 subscribers27 August 2026 — 801 subscribers4 September 2026 — 811 subscribers13 September 2026 — 834 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 796–839 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 07:38834+23
4 Sept 2026, 23:00811+10
27 Aug 2026, 13:58801-6
21 Aug 2026, 12:19807-1
14 Aug 2026, 22:45808-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:33810no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:49810first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

252 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 542052496266864279014055.6%
custom 528282252583791176511244.4%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 15 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mixed_by_babybear. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 January 2026 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC339 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как дела вообще обстоят в индустрии? А то за последний год много артистов отвалилось, с которыми работал чуть ли не по 7-10 лет. У кого-то музыка перестала писаться, кто-то словил тильт от ИИ в чартах, кто-то вообще будто забил на всё это дело. Как у вас там вообще дела? Пишется музыка? Есть мотивация выпускаться? Или тоже какая-то странная херня происходит?

custom 52828225258379117655custom 54205249626686427902

15 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC335 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Давно я тут не делился интересными новинками из мира звукорежиссуры, и момент настал 🙌 Я много лет работаю со звуком и постоянно задавался вопросом: «Почему нельзя придумать программу, в которой просто описываешь задачу, а она выдает тебе готовый плагин с одной крутилкой для нужного звука?» Что-то вроде создания программы через Claude или Qwen, только конкретно для работы со звуком. И что думаете? Я недавно наткн…

custom 54205249626686427904custom 52828225258379117653

18 Jun 2026, 12:59 UTC504 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

По вашим многочисленным просьбам решил сделать для вас небольшой подгон! Делюсь пресетами моего фирменного мастеринга, которые использовал в реальных проектах. СКАЧАТЬ Пресеты из треков, которые я разбирал ранее. Если ещё не смотрели мои разборы, обязательно залетайте на YOUTUBE 📹 Очень интересно посмотреть на ваши результаты, поэтому кидайте в комментарии треки до и после обработки моими пресетами. Набираем реак…

custom 54205249626686427909custom 52828225258379117656

6 Jun 2026, 06:30 UTC531 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Заказать: @by_babybear www.mixedbybabybear.ru

custom 542052496266864279010custom 52828225258379117657

26 May 2026, 18:21 UTC631 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Несколько лет я думал о разработке индивидуального темплейта под ключ, благодаря которому любой сможет с лёгкостью получать идентичный результат, который я делаю ему при услуге «Сведение и мастеринг PRO». По многочисленным просьбам я собрался духом и начал его разработку вместе с описанием того, что в него входит. Ведь многие артисты хотят сами слышать результат работы в онлайн-режиме и полностью контролировать его.…

custom 54205249626686427907custom 52828225258379117656

8 May 2026, 15:00 UTC601 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

РАЗБОР СВЕДЕНИЯ ТРЕКА YOUTUBE | VK Даня Гуськов — «Не надо говорить мне да» • Информация • Портфолио • Прайс-лист DM: @by_babybear VK | GENIUS | YOUTUBE | САЙТ

custom 528282252583791176510custom 54205249626686427907

18 Apr 2026, 15:01 UTC788 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

РАЗБОР СВЕДЕНИЯ ТРЕКА YOUTUBE | VK СПОЙ СО МНОЙ – «НОТЫ» • Информация • Портфолио • Прайс-лист DM: @by_babybear VK | GENIUS | YOUTUBE | САЙТ

custom 542052496266864279010custom 52828225258379117658

7 Apr 2026, 08:10 UTC937 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Студийная сессия с BABYBEAR 🐻 Mini‑студия готова к работе🧡 • Выбирай → Бронируй → Приходи! Новая студия уже ждет тебя🤙 Новый Прайс-лист💸 Услуги: • Запись вокала • Сведение + Мастеринг • Запись + Сведение + Мастеринг 📍Адрес📍 • г. Москва, м. Университет/Вавиловская, ул. Крупской, 8к3. Время работы: • 09:00 - 21:00 По всем вопросам Жду всех❗️

custom 542052496266864279011custom 52828225258379117657

13 Mar 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,090 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чёт кислые пока результаты опроса( И ни одного трека в комментах. Даю время до воскресенья проголосовать и закинуть треки в комменты. Но чую, нужно будет самому выбрать трек для обзора и разбора. Я думаю, что сделаю просто 3-5 треков на выбор, где я точно смогу показать, как я сводил инструментал, вокал и делал мастеринг. То есть всю работу от начала до финала.

custom 542052496266864279010custom 52828225258379117658

12 Mar 2026, 06:31 UTC780 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Обзор

  1. Выборочный трек из комментов32%
  2. Го любой разбор трека41%
  3. Сведение в стиле "....."37%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 54205249626686427907custom 52828225258379117653

12 Mar 2026, 06:30 UTC755 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Думаю, может разбор замутить какой-нибудь на Ютубчик. Только не знаю, на какой трек это сделать. Кто давно за мной следит, есть мысли? На что-то старое прям смысла не вижу, но, мб, кому было бы интересно узнать соус старых работ? По поводу Сведения в стиле кого либо, пишите свои предпочтения под этим постом. Так же, пишите и кидайте варианты выборочных треков. Лучшие мои работы можно найти тут: https://t.me/mix_by…

custom 52828225258379117658custom 54205249626686427905

3 Mar 2026, 18:14 UTC855 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну реально новый ноут дает жесткого буста! Не вру, люди чувствуют это!

custom 542052496266864279011custom 52828225258379117655

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mixed_by_babybear. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Mar 2026, 06:31 UTCAnonymous Poll73 voters

Обзор

  1. Выборочный трек из комментов32%
  2. Го любой разбор трека41%
  3. Сведение в стиле "....."37%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mixed by BABYBEAR” (@mixed_by_babybear), 834 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mixed_by_babybear.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.