Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for лухари

Channel

лухари

@mixbyluxari

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

167subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002296205797
TypeChannel
Username@mixbyluxari
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mixbyluxari

Growth

167168167.57 August 2026 — 168 subscribers8 August 2026 — 168 subscribers16 August 2026 — 167 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167–168 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:07167-1
8 Aug 2026, 15:30168no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:14168first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.9%
avg views ÷ 167 subscribers
Avg views / post
65.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held20 (28 February 202628 July 2026)
Views total65
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
41100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mixbyluxari. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 February 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 18:37 UTC65 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

на линуксе тяжело писать музыку. про сведение я молчу. я без ёбли смог скачать лишь фабфильтр бандл. без ёбли имеется ввиду плагины работали без проблем. в общем оптимальный вариант для музыки винда и мак

4

26 Jun 2026, 08:55 UTC169 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

мой любимый музыкант это валюта скуратов

12

20 Jun 2026, 14:09 UTC186 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

рипер лучшая микс дав для винды. на мак наверное лоджик

3

7 Jun 2026, 21:54 UTC242 viewsread 8 August 2026

держите своё слово сводите музыкантам треки которые обещали свести. я это иногда не делал и к хорошему не приводило

27 May 2026, 20:42 UTC333 viewsread 8 August 2026

я удалил все че связано с этим делом. нарисовался вариант свести марко найн. воспользоваться?

5 May 2026, 09:31 UTC370 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

полезное наблюдение. мой канал — отличный пример того, как может всё меняться.

1

17 Apr 2026, 08:43 UTC389 viewsread 8 August 2026

только сейчас понял что это очень поверхностный пост, но в то же время полезный. писал, кстати, полностью сам. когда ехал в поезде в москву, без интернета. чата джипити у меня тогда тоже не было

4 Apr 2026, 14:44 UTC320 views1 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026

тяжело забросить этот канал. у меня слишком крутые подписчики для этого. спасибо)

1

4 Apr 2026, 14:41 UTC288 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kalimeiro

зачем бог дал мозг женщине? чтобы она не пила воду с ведра когда моет полы (c) лухари

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mixbyluxari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Mar 2026, 17:58 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

интересовались ли вы покупкой сведения у меня?

  1. да, потому что...31%
  2. нет, потому что...69%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Mar 2026, 17:09 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

вам нравились мои посты, видео? мой формат вещания?

  1. да (пишем в комментарии почему, что цепляло а что нет)86%
  2. нет (так же пишем в комментарии почему, чего не хватает)14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2026 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“лухари” (@mixbyluxari), 167 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mixbyluxari.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.