поскетчила побырику (негры отделались лёгким испугом) #арт #скетч
custom 52850264582411107816💘1custom 53100840447702840481custom 53462086710995488131

Channel
@miuki_chii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
78subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001576875696 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miuki_chii |
| Description | ✧ маюсь всяким, картиночки рисую, музычкой балуюсь (иногда ещё 18+ проскакивает, соре) mmiuki_chii mMiuki_chIi mmiukichii миюкичии meowkiech micookiech |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miuki_chii |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 78 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 78 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (25 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 400 |
| Reactions total | 66 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
108 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 45.4% | |
| custom 5242375543206221099 | 16 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5242713076096082253 | 13 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5346208671099548813 | 10 | 9.26% | |
| custom 5310084044770284048 | 8 | 7.41% | |
| custom 5285026458241110781 | 6 | 5.56% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 2.78% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.78% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
поскетчила побырику (негры отделались лёгким испугом) #арт #скетч
custom 52850264582411107816💘1custom 53100840447702840481custom 53462086710995488131
самое время для летней перерисовки мне кажется с цветами я всё таки совладала, хех #арт #полноценка #поэтап #летний_дта
❤7custom 53462086710995488132💘1
катались в горы на 4 дня, чтоб очень активно отдыхать, вот собсна закаты и кот честно говоря ничего полноценного нарисовать неуспелось, но я начала одну крутую картинку, которую надеюсь закончить в течении пары дней предварительно я запаслась вещичками чтобы прятаться от солнца, но конечно же в самый ясный день, когда мы попёрлись по тропе на гору, ничего на мне не оказалось, мде ну ещё у меня на колене заспавнился с…
❤5🔥3custom 52423755432062210993
опа решила в кое-что веки упомянуть в видео моего единственного платного подписчика на бусти, а то как-то некрасиво получалось (если хотите так же, угадайте что нужно сделать ;) ) вот #видева https://youtu.be/LPHB0e7SX40
❤4custom 52427130760960822533custom 53100840447702840482
чё-то так мне понравилось этой размазнёй вазюкать, воздушненько получается + сочетания цветов хорошо сочетаются если б мне платили каждый раз, когда я забываю нарисовать заколки Олежи (это кстати спойлер кххм) #арт
custom 52423755432062210997❤4custom 52427130760960822531
почти ровно год назад я уже рисовала Хезер и даже похожей кисточкой (но в Крите она лучше) и даже виден прогресс "перерисовка" правда получилась случайно, потому что теперь это артик на конкурс, авось повезёт мнмнмнм а ещё я сессию закрыла, так что теперь буду почаще рисовакать ну и доброй ночи 🌙 #арт #полноценка #сх_фанарт
❤10custom 53100840447702840483custom 52427130760960822532
у этого лета подозрительные вайбы... каждый оридж с Олежей делает одного миюкича счастливее :D
❤5custom 53462086710995488132
однажды я случайно замотивировала свою подругу сделать песню с моим утау, по рофлу, но щас я вдохновилась её артом и вот че выдала(с её утау) йоу @ryshech @miuki_chii
❤7custom 53462086710995488131
ни сексов ни бичей, но зато яркая картинка #арт #полноценка
custom 52423755432062210996custom 52427130760960822532custom 53100840447702840481
меня проспонсировал на ярко розовый акрил и пришло время им пользоваться теперь в моей коллекции есть Хезер на микрохолсте #арт #сх_фанарт
❤6custom 52427130760960822533custom 53100840447702840481
ради вампирских зубов даже пришлось нарисовать рот( с прошлого #dtiys от @mysticalbuttons по моим ощущениям прошло не так много времени, но я полистала свои посты и оказалось что прошло почти 3 месяца, мде ну и изначальный вайб я просрала #арт #полноценка
custom 53462086710995488134custom 52427130760960822532❤1💘1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @miuki_chii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 939,906 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“м¿” (@miuki_chii), 78 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miuki_chii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.