Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 蜜桃:地平线

Channel
@mitaoTM8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
852subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002052183061 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mitaoTM8 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mitaoTM8 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 852 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 852 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 August 2024 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
15 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8 | 53.3% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2024 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 蜜桃:地平线
卖粉的时候,我甚至在期盼 我要是出大鱼就好了,这样我就能留住他了
Signed 蜜桃 小南
💖 情不知所起,一往情深 愿,有人与你立黄昏,有人问你粥可温。有人与你捻熄灯,有人共你书半生。情人节快乐!🧡
Signed Payne小南
岂不闻光阴如骏马加鞭,日月如落花流水, 转眼间又到新的一年 2025年,我们与您同行,共铸辉煌❗️ —蜜桃团队🥪
Signed Payne小南
真实流量,童叟无欺,价格美丽,十年国内出份经验,有量,有质量,不掺水。可上三方APP、指定落地页!
Signed Payne小南
👍10年😚😳经验,专业团队 让你以低的价格得到优质的流量📱
Signed Payne小南
7x24小时出粉 出优质色粉📱 7x24小时出粉 出优质色粉📱 盘总,请速来📱
Signed Payne小南
冬已至 天渐冷 愿你在这个冬季里,没有风霜雨雪💦,只有阳光明媚☀️
👍1🥰1
Signed Payne小南
什么样的男人🧀才配的上”东南亚战神“的称号?
The shares total 195%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍2🤔2😁2❤1
Signed Payne小南
儿时伙伴今犹在, 缅甸老挝柬埔寨 菲律宾没有雪,马尼拉没有爱 👜
Signed Payne小南
公元2024年10月19日,汇旺担保正式更名为好旺担保,本次更名只涉及品牌变更,频道和工作人员用户名、上押地址、收费标准等均保持不变。汇旺担保此次涉及品牌变更,不知是否因其实体公司在柬埔寨的缘故,毕竟作为灰/黑产业的头牌服务商,已经被太多人铭记✅ 之前小道❕消息:称汇旺被泰达公司冻结了2963万美金💰,价值超3亿人民币。后者由于某东方大国帮助柬埔寨修运河,柬埔寨开始协同作战打击电诈:洪玛奈宣布:表示如有必要,包括陆军在内的军队将与司法警察直接协作,共同应对网赌电诈犯罪。🤔说到底还是树大招风! PS:目前看来“汇旺”已然成为过去式,随着时间推移也会成为江湖传说!现在还有多少人记得黄站长哦 理性吃瓜,🧀保命!
Signed Payne小南
蜜桃出粉,逐梦天涯 ✅ 很久没有发广告了☺️,首先,感谢您抽出宝贵的时间与我们洽谈合作机会。在当前快速变化的市场环境中,我们深知建立长期的合作关系对于实现共同目标的重要性。💡 我们相信,通过紧密🆗合作,我们能够实现双赢的局面。期待能在近日与您进行深入的讨论,探索更多合作机会👍。 如您有任何疑问❓或需要更多信息,请随时与我们联系。期待您的💌回复!
❤1👍1
Signed Payne小南
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mitaoTM8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
什么样的男人🧀才配的上”东南亚战神“的称号?
The shares total 195%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
下一站是哪里?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
✅爱兄弟,还是爱黄金?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2024 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 342,453 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“糖心专业出粉” (@mitaoTM8), 852 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mitaoTM8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.