Channel
@mupainews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,431subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002244059976 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mupainews |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mupainews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 3,431 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 3,432 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 3,432 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 4 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 85.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2025 to 18 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友爆料：黑桃A园区新建于八号路。 目前这里正在大规模接收从其他地方被转移过来的人。昨天仅仅吃一顿饭的时间，就有十几辆大巴将人拉进园区。也许，这里会成为我们这些狗推的终点站。 园区内大多数是国内盘。路过其他公司门口，能清楚听到电棍的声音，甚至在公司外的大马路上，直接对人使用电击。更令人愤怒和寒心的是，他们还指使柬埔寨本地人殴打中国人。 我想问一句： 让当地人殴打我们中国同胞，究竟是为了什么？ 这是在立威，还是在羞辱？ 这样的行为，难道不觉得丢自己中国人的脸吗？ 在这里，我想呼吁所有中国同胞，以及仍然保有良知的外国兄弟们： 我们需要的是人身安全、基本尊严，以及最起码的自由出入权利。 我们不想再被暴力、恐吓和非法限制所对待。 如果今晚园区没有开放。不能自由出入。我认为我们也应该举起双手进行必要的反抗。今天晚上12点园区依旧不进行开放。那我们就门口集合让我们为自由。为自己的生命而战！！
❤2
#网友反馈：整个柬埔寨的园区 都在搬家 都在开放，西港凯旋城还是硬得很 之前一直是高压⚡️状态，天天基本都是pc 电棍。 昨天把设备全部搬出去了，管理说休息一个星期，又准备继续，里面主要以国盘 印度股票 美国精聊，什么时候才能到这个地方自由。在不开放，就要报警了。大家一起鱼死网破。
❤1
#网友反馈：刚刚木牌 AI 港大逃亡 很多人从园区里面冲出来了
木牌立马高园区很多公司也开始搬家了！ 现在木牌很多园区也都已经开放式管理了，只有木牌立马高的物业什么也不通知！ 保安也都走了很多，现在公司屁也不放一个。底薪也一直拖着不发。
❤1
#最新消息：木牌金星科技园通知，开会说明天之前要全部撤离 明天有大部队来视察园区 🔔欢迎订阅柬埔寨大事件 ☎️ 投稿/商务：@vnvn27
拜林拍照的推推，你被泰国警察发现了！ 泰媒报道说，泰警一把手塔猜带领多国警察视察拜林边境，在对一个诈骗园区进行视察时发现了诈骗分子。泰媒报道称：“园区里的人员发现国际小组在观察他们，显得大吃一惊，他们走了出来，开始用手机拍摄代表团，凸显了他们明目张胆的行径。” 没别的意思， 第一次看到首长来园区视察， 有点小激动。 🔔欢迎订阅柬埔寨大事件 ☎️ 投稿/商务：@vnvn27
#网友爆料：老皇乐园区旁边园区209办公室做的台湾精聊，幕后大老板是园区的老板所谓的星哥，齐飞是星哥的人也是园区的管理，说已经将工资发放给卡车，卡车是带我女朋友去上班做话务模特的，从8月7号上班到9月14号的工资扣掉预支的薪水还有差不多4000u ，到至今为止我女朋友还一毛钱没拿到。 找卡车和齐飞一个给一个甩锅，反正现在你们就是不想给这个工资了呗，操你妈的逼来东南亚几年第一次遇到你们这样的垃圾，一个女孩子的钱都坑，要去这个园区上班的注意了，别被所谓的星哥坑了，到时候又拿不到工资，最重要星哥还是园区物业，就这点格局？4000u都没有？ 🔔欢迎订阅柬埔寨大事件 ☎️ 投稿/商务：@vnvn27
❤1
又有候选人遭枪杀身亡嫌犯与警员交火后受伤落网 #菲律宾新闻 人民党第三位提名人、前描笼涯主席莱南斯基·巴库德被枪击事件被描笼涯的闭路电视拍摄到。 该事件于昨天（4 月 28 日）发生在 Sta 路。 Teresita St. 马尼拉 Sampaloc P. Guevarra 街拐角处。 根据警方的初步调查，当一辆载有两名身份不明嫌疑人的摩托车抵达时，巴库德正与几个人站在一起。后面的骑兵下马向巴库德开枪。 一名在场的警察做出了反应并与嫌疑人交火，但嫌疑人向拉克森大道逃窜。 巴库德被送往医院，但也因身体多处中枪而死亡。 这名警官腿部遭枪伤，目前正在康复中。 🔔欢迎订阅柬埔寨大事件 ☎️ 投稿/商务：@vnvn27
❤2
洪玛奈下令持续打击网络诈骗犯罪 #柬埔寨新闻 4月4日上午，柬埔寨总理洪玛奈主持内阁全体会议上发布指令，要求所有相关部门继续严厉打击柬埔寨社会持续存在的网络诈骗（Online Scams）犯罪活动。 洪玛奈强调，新成立的打击网络诈骗委员会是现有执法机制的补充而非替代，旨在整合各方力量协同作战，通过常态化合作彻底遏制此类违法犯罪行为。 🔔欢迎订阅柬埔寨大事件 ☎️ 投稿/商务：@vnvn27
🤡1
4月5日美国驻仰光大使馆宣布 追加700万美元 援助用于 #缅甸地震 救援与重建。 累计总额：加3月31日的援助200万美元，总数900万美元 🔔欢迎订阅柬埔寨大事件 ☎️ 投稿/商务：@vnvn27
❤1👍1
#西港狗推求助：2月底公司聚餐喝多了上头了舔了大逼。那天晚上喝太多了，印象里直接抱着她的逼就是一顿乱舔，上个月中旬口腔开始溃烂😞之前还以为是上火溃疡了，后面越来越严重，现在上班敲键盘都没心情了，想问下大家西港哪里可以治疗这种疾病。 一代舔逼大神就此落幕了。 🔔欢迎订阅柬埔寨大事件 ☎️ 投稿/商务：@vnvn27
#网友爆料 柬埔寨西港丽豪赌场米西专业卖人，我在西港身上没钱了就去西港出码了，我在群里找了一个叫米西的他带我到丽豪赌场。 我出了20000的码，赢了钱，不给退，来了5个人围住我，不让走，必须打这一群人就在丽豪，港岛出码，专业买卖人。 Ps：一顿操作猛如🐯 🔔欢迎订阅柬埔寨大事件 ☎️ 投稿/商务：@vnvn27
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mupainews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 428,326 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柬埔寨大事件/木牌新闻” (@mupainews), 3,431 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mupainews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.