Channel
@mishellepreston
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
132subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003002970535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mishellepreston |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mishellepreston |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 132 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 133 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 133 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (3 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,111 |
| Reactions total | 224 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
224 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5429634803051824415 | 61 | 27.2% | |
| custom 5375367620683926957 | 47 | 21.0% | |
| custom 5413645211039471718 | 38 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5195019667592217680 | 22 | 9.82% | |
| custom 5188452898819843276 | 14 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5429258289038784764 | 14 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5314285695311844637 | 13 | 5.80% | |
| custom 5377728830494507428 | 8 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5447563327985192119 | 6 | 2.68% | |
| custom 5188587769382870229 | 1 | 0.446% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mishellepreston. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ЮЧИКИ ☺️🥬🥬🥬 и ☺️🥬🥬 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ☺️ол: 9 слотов ☺️ео: 9 слотов цена: на сола- 250, на гео- 250 писать: @shu_shara 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 автор позы: @kalGsu
Signed (отвечу позже)₍ ₍ 𝅄 ✧ пᥱр𝓬я 𝅄 १ ⌗𝐦𝓊ꭐ𝑒ꪒь𝒸𝑜ꪒы
Posted without readable text
custom 51950196675922176801custom 54136452110394717181custom 54292582890387847641
Signed (отвечу позже)₍ ₍ 𝅄 ✧ пᥱр𝓬я 𝅄 १ ⌗𝐦𝓊ꭐ𝑒ꪒь𝒸𝑜ꪒы
🗝🍓🍓🍓🔤 𝒹ℴ𝓃'𝓉 𝒸𝒶𝓇ℯ 𝓂𝓊𝒸𝒽 🗝🍓🍓🍓 𝒶𝒷ℴ𝓊𝓉 𝓎ℴ𝓊 🔤𝓊𝓉 𝐼 𝓌ℴ𝓊𝓁𝒹𝓃'𝓉 𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒹 𝒾𝒻 𝓎ℴ𝓊 𝓁𝒾𝓀ℯ𝒹 𝓂ℯ 𝓉ℴℴ 🔤а самом деле, не смотря на своё поведение по отношению к людям, Рей довольно чувствительный и нежный. Его грубые слова и отстраненность больше являются защитным механизмом, и не всегда он имеет ввиду то, что говорит или делает. Часто он чуть ли не сразу начинает жалеть о своих словах и испытывать чувство вины. Вот только для него взять, изв…
custom 54296348030518244151
Signed (отвечу позже)₍ ₍ 𝅄 ✧ пᥱр𝓬я 𝅄 १ ⌗𝐦𝓊ꭐ𝑒ꪒь𝒸𝑜ꪒы
꒰ 𖦹 ꒱ ⁺ ꔫ . ✷ "—Mold's love will always belong to you honey" "—Oh...I know, thanks, pookie" ::Честно я до сих пор не знаю какая будет манерная речь у Нахари поэтому скорее всего на каждом подобном посте она будет отличаться:: ꒰ 𖦹 ꒱ ⁺ ꔫ . ✷ #Молд #Нахари
custom 54136452110394717181
Signed ₍ ₍ 𝅄 ✧ пᥱр𝓬я 𝅄 १ ⌗𝐦𝓊ꭐ𝑒ꪒь𝒸𝑜ꪒы
Posted without readable text
custom 51950196675922176803custom 54296348030518244153custom 54475633279851921193
Signed ₍ ₍ 𝅄 ✧ пᥱр𝓬я 𝅄 १ ⌗𝐦𝓊ꭐ𝑒ꪒь𝒸𝑜ꪒы
🔤ервый реквест готов ! — Я сейчас пробую новые стили и учусь разным техникам, и был бы очень очень рад, если бы вы оценили ! ☺️ #арт #other
custom 53753676206839269574custom 53777288304945074283custom 54296348030518244153
Signed ₍ ₍ 𝅄 ✧ пᥱр𝓬я 𝅄 १ ⌗𝐦𝓊ꭐ𝑒ꪒь𝒸𝑜ꪒы
well well well #шушарисует #сайлисы
custom 54136452110394717183custom 51885877693828702291custom 51950196675922176801
Signed ₍ ₍ 𝅄 ✧ пᥱр𝓬я 𝅄 १ ⌗𝐦𝓊ꭐ𝑒ꪒь𝒸𝑜ꪒы
you look cuter when you look at me #каракули #jingfane
custom 54296348030518244154custom 54136452110394717183custom 54292582890387847642custom 54475633279851921191
Signed ₍ ₍ 𝅄 ✧ пᥱр𝓬я 𝅄 १ ⌗𝐦𝓊ꭐ𝑒ꪒь𝒸𝑜ꪒы
🎀Спасибо @Mel_liar за ещё один подарок каналу 🌟🌟 #mylovelies
custom 519501966759221768013custom 51884528988198432769custom 54292582890387847649
Signed ₍ ₍ 𝅄 ✧ пᥱр𝓬я 𝅄 १ ⌗𝐦𝓊ꭐ𝑒ꪒь𝒸𝑜ꪒы
𖧁ִ𖧁 ⎯ּ︭ 𓈒 ִ۫ 🤩lipping through my fingers ⭐️ ABBA 𓈒ִ ♡⃘ 𑩚ུ ㅤ⭐️⭐️⭐️ㅤ||ㅤ𝅄 ֺ ִ꒱꯭ 𖧁ִ୧ ִ꒰ ֺ 𝅄 ⏜ֺ ᷼ ︵᷼ ︵ֺ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─ֺ─꯭─ֺ──ִ ᷼ 𓈒 ֺ ࣪᷼♯ 📃ִ─꯭ ִ 𝐒𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐦𝐲 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 ᨳ࣪♡゙ִৎ ִ۪ 𓈒 ꒱ִ꒱ִ 𝅄𝅄 ⸻ 𝙸 𝚝𝚛𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚢 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚞𝚝𝚎!! 𝂅ׄ ◟ ֺ𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑖𝑛 𝑖𝑡 𝅄 ִ ֺ𝆋𔓕ֺ 🌼|| 𝑖𝑛 𝑖𝑡. 𓈒 ۫ ⏝︶…
Signed ₍ ₍ 𝅄 ✧ пᥱр𝓬я 𝅄 १ ⌗𝐦𝓊ꭐ𝑒ꪒь𝒸𝑜ꪒы
𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘕𝘰.9 : 𝘎𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘺 𝘞𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘭𝘦𝘺🕰 Каковы же отношения между Кимберли Джоейс и Джинни Уизли?🕰 Отношения в девушек вначале были чудесными. Джинни дружила с Кимберли точно так же, как с ней дружил её старший брат Рон. Сама Кимберли относилась к Джинни с теплотой, видела в ней хорошую подругу и просто знакомую, к которой всегда можно обратиться за помощью. Но не все так сладко. Если все чудесно помнят, то Джинни сильно…
Signed ₍ ₍ 𝅄 ✧ пᥱр𝓬я 𝅄 १ ⌗𝐦𝓊ꭐ𝑒ꪒь𝒸𝑜ꪒы
🤩🤩 🗝💕🤩𝓃 𝓉𝒽ℯ 𝓃𝒾𝑔𝒽𝓉 🤩🤩 🤍🤍🗝🤍🤍🤍🤩 🔤ошмары у Ресы случаются не так часто, но когда это происходит это очень ударяет по девушке. В детстве они с братом всегда успокаивали друг друга в такие моменты, но уже во взрослом возрасте Реса старается справляться со всем сама и не беспокоить Рея по мелочи. 🔤о в отношениях с Солом такое не спрячешь. Не только потому что Сол наблюдал за ней и знал о том, что обычно она спит крепко. К…
Signed ₍ ₍ 𝅄 ✧ пᥱр𝓬я 𝅄 १ ⌗𝐦𝓊ꭐ𝑒ꪒь𝒸𝑜ꪒы
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mishellepreston. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 104,253 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mishellepreston named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♡⇢ ୨୧𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓼𝔂𝓪'𝓼 𝓭𝔀𝓮𝓵𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓰” (@mishellepreston), 132 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mishellepreston.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.