Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 41 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,700–4,717 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 06:38
4,707
+5
12 Sept 2026, 13:41
4,702
-3
8 Sept 2026, 07:42
4,705
-5
2 Sept 2026, 17:43
4,710
-1
30 Aug 2026, 16:43
4,711
+1
27 Aug 2026, 17:56
4,710
+1
24 Aug 2026, 20:59
4,709
-5
18 Aug 2026, 18:12
4,714
-1
12 Aug 2026, 11:55
4,715
+5
9 Aug 2026, 18:12
4,710
+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:52
4,709
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:12
4,709
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 07s
Average length
2m 07s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
701 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
378
53.9%
👏
127
18.1%
👍
59
8.42%
😍
50
7.13%
😁
38
5.42%
😎
34
4.85%
😢
11
1.57%
🥰
3
0.428%
😘
1
0.143%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 701 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏫 احتمالا این سوال که «ریاضی چه ربطی به هوش مصنوعی داره؟» تا بحال ذهن شما رو هم درگیر کرده!
🔹 میتونین جواب سوالتون رو از زبان مجید میرزاوزیری بشنوین ... 😎
🌐 اطلاعات بیشتر و ثبتنام
#هدکد_چهار
🫥
🏫 website 💬telegram
🆔 instagram 🆔linkedin
💬 bale
دوستان عزیزم
مدتیست به راهاندازی یک پادکست که میخواهم نام آن را «پایکست | πCast» بگذارم فکر میکنم.
احتمالاً در این پادکست دربارهٔ موضوعاتی مانند ریاضیات، فلسفه، ادبیات و گاهی هم تجربههای شخصی و آموزشی صحبت خواهم کرد. همچنین قصد دارم به پرسشهای پرتکرار که معمولاً از من پرسیده میشود، در قالب فایلهای صوتی پاسخ دهم.
اگر درباره شیوهٔ اجرا، موضوعات یا هر بخش دیگر پیشنهادی دارید، بسیار خوشحال میشوم آن را از طری…
با توجه به این که گروه کتابخانه به حالت اختصاصی تغییر پیدا کرده است، در صورت تمایل به عضویت در کتابخانه میتوانید به ادمین کانال به نشانی
@arithland
پیام دهید تا لینک اختصاصی عضویت در گروه را دریافت کنید.
دوستان عزیزم
یادآوری میکنم که هدف من از راهاندازی کتابخانه، ایجاد فضایی صمیمیتر از یک کانال عمومی است؛ جایی برای به اشتراک گذاشتن نوشتهها، ایدهها و طرحهای تازه تا پیش از انتشار نهایی، از نگاهها و پیشنهادهای ارزشمند شما بهرهمند شوم.
به همین دلیل، بهزودی کتابخانه به فضایی خصوصی و اختصاصی برای اعضا تبدیل خواهد شد.
در این محفل صمیمی، آثار و نوشتههای جدید پیش از انتشار رسمی در اختیار شما قرار میگیرد تا با اس…
ز انتگرال و مشتق هر دو فریاد
که هرچه ای بگیره او کنه پاد
نمایی تابعی سازُم ز فولاد
که از دست حسابون گردد آزاد
- بابا نپر عریان -
مجید میرزاوزیری
دوشنبه ۲۹ تیر ۰۵
@mirzavaziribooks
دشمن درونی
پیشوند دُش به معنای بد و زشت، که آن را در کلمات دشمن و دشنام بیشتر دیدهایم، ظاهراً شبیه علامت نقیض در منطق است؛ مثلاً دشمن کسی است که بدِ من را میخواهد و دشنام عبارتی است که نام را زشت میگرداند.
از اینرو شاید بتوان دشمن درونی را نوعی پارادکس دانست: من ممکن است کاری کنم که خود، دشمن خود گردم.
اخیراً وابستگی به ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی چنان شیوع یافته که حتی در گزارشهای رسمی مراکز دولتی و علمی نیز رد پای …
🔗وایزلند برگزار میکند:
✅آزمون مهارت حل مسئله
⭕️ویژه دانشآموزان ورودی پایه ششم
🔹۴۰ سؤال تحلیلی برای سنجش توانایی حل مسئله و شرکت در آزمونهای ملی و جهانی
📅زمان برگزاری: ۱ مرداد
📍مکان برگزاری: پارک علم و فناوری دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
❗️سؤالات این آزمون توسط جمعی از استادان دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد طراحی شده است.
📎ظرفیت محدود
📞جهت ثبتنام و دریافت اطلاعات بیشتر با شماره 09375000937 تماس بگیرید یا به آیدی
@wiselandadmin
در ت…
آزمونِ خودآموز
آیا یک آزمون میتواند خودش باعث پیدا کردن پاسخهای درست خودش شود؟
همه ما این ادعا را شنیدهایم که امتحان باید یکی از جلسات درس باشد؛ به این معنی که شاگردان باید در امتحان هم چیزی را یاد بگیرند.
ممکن است ما با طرح سؤالات وابسته به هم که در چند مرحله به یافتن راهحل منجر میشوند این کار را انجام داده باشیم ولی چیزی که من به دنبال آن هستم متفاوت با این است. در حقیقت من به دنبال چیزی شبیه کد تصحیح خطا ه…
شکستن دیوار چهارم و متافیکشن در آزمونها و مسابقات معتبر ریاضی
احتمالاً در فیلمهای سینمایی یا تئاترها با این حالت برخورد کردهاید که هنرپیشه، رو به تماشاگر میکند و مستقیماً با او حرف میزند. این حالت را اصطلاحاً شکستن دیوار چهارم مینامند.
به علاوه ممکن است نوشتههایی را خوانده باشید که نویسنده تصمیم میگیرد از روایت خارج شود و به روایت خودش از بیرون اشاره کند. این را متافیکشن یا فراداستان مینامند.
من فکر میکن…
دختر گلم! پسر عزیزم!
من برای نوشتن این دانشنامه به کتابهای ریاضی دبستان در جاهای مختلف نگاه کردم و کلماتی رو انتخاب کردم که معمولاً در این کتابها در کشورهای مختلف اومده. ممکنه بعضی از این کلمهها در کتابهای ما نیومده باشه ولی خب اشکالی نداره. به هر حال بد نیست آدم چیزای بیشتری بلد باشه.
من فعلاً ۲۳۲ تا کلمه پیدا کردم که اونا رو به ترتیب الفبای فارسی در اینجا آوردم ولی آدم که کف دستش رو بو نکرده، شاید بعداً بیشت…
دانشنامه تصویری ریاضی برای بچههای دبستانی
مجید میرزاوزیری
استاد دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
@mirzavaziribooks
❤15😎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mirzavaziribooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mirzavaziribooks named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mirzavazirilib named in 13 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
FɪʀᴇFᴏx ᴘʀᴏxʏ @Ferifox_proxy · 35,174 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 September 2026
علی ميرصادقی @ali_mirsadeghi · 46,693 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد @fumpr · 28,311 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آثار مجید میرزاوزیری” (@mirzavaziribooks), 4,707 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mirzavaziribooks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.