Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Миранда Эдвардс | Автор

Channel

Миранда Эдвардс | Автор

@mirandaedwards

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

504subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001696899179
TypeChannel
Username@mirandaedwards
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mirandaedwards

Growth

503504503.57 August 2026 — 503 subscribers7 August 2026 — 503 subscribers14 August 2026 — 504 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 503–504 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:27504+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:16503no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:00503first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 504 subscribers
Avg views / post
90.0
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held10 (16 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total720
Reactions total44
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53840820491979620573452.3%
custom 54519952317234700131320.0%
custom 5438326047332391067710.8%
custom 532796346534253813569.23%
custom 606215698608082416257.69%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 00:05 UTC55 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nemesis_booksPhoto

Девочки, вам это надо 🥵 Это настолько горячо, что у меня щеки покраснели 🫣 ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️ Автор: Миранда Эдвардс Название: В объятиях дьявола

custom 53840820491979620573custom 54519952317234700133custom 54383260473323910672

3 Aug 2026, 23:09 UTC69 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 мы с ии до сих пор не стали подружками, но слушайте, довольно неплохо вроде. как у вас вообще дела, девочки? тут такая тишина в последнее время... стыдненько. из новостей: я определилась с важной частью сюжета в книге Доминика. думаю, будет интересно и довольно мрачно🤩 а история Дэмиена уже близится к раскрытием всех тайн и секретов

custom 53840820491979620575

2 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC82 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤩 обе главы вышли, я забыла об этом написать😳

custom 53840820491979620575

1 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC76 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nemesis_booksPhoto

Мои первые впечатления о книге 😁

custom 53840820491979620573custom 54519952317234700133custom 54383260473323910672

1 Aug 2026, 00:58 UTC100 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не успеваю все проверить, главы будут завтра(

custom 53840820491979620573

31 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC102 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ❌❌🤩🤩 ❌❌🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩— Помоги мне, — прошу я. Расстегнув бюстгальтер, сбрасываю и его, следом на пол летят мои трусики. Я полностью обнажена. Мои инстинкты требуют прикрыть наготу, каждую лишнюю складку и отнюдь не изящные бедра, но я прижимаю руки к бокам. Дэмиен окидывает мое тело быстрым взглядом, он не оценивает и не судит меня. Его глаза возвращаются к моему лицу и изучают его. — Я доверяю тебе, — повторяю я.

custom 54519952317234700135

29 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTC85 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dreambook_publishingPhoto

Друзья, мы получаем много вопросов, и отвечаем честно: да, наши тиражи попали под те самые пожары на складах. Поэтому часть книг на WB пропали из продажи. Хотим напомнить, что наш родной магазин Дримбук24 продолжает работать, и мы ждём вас на своём сайте. У нас живой склад, уцелевшие экземпляры и полный ассортимент. Заказ приедет удобным для вас способом: 📦 Почта России 📦 СДЭК 📦 Яндекс Доставка Выбирайте тот, котор

custom 60621569860808241625

24 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC151 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤍 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩Не успели мы насладиться нашими голубками, перемирием двух любимых звезд, как все снова стало слишком сложным. Но разве может быть иначе, когда дело касается Дэмиена Олдриджа? Пока вся группа усердно работает над новым альбомом, наша Золушка была замечена с лучшим другом Дэмиена и бас-гитаристом группы «Dark Paradise». И не на простой прогулке с кофе! Наша редакция получила снимки, на которых Кристиан

custom 53840820491979620575

17 Jul 2026, 18:10 UTC168 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ❌❌🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩Но не только это терзает меня. Много лет назад я совершила ошибку, сломавшую жизнь моему отцу, просто промолчав, а ложь папы запустила необратимую цепную реакцию, которая стоила ему жизни. Его адвокат обещал спасти его, но ничего не вышло.🤩

custom 53840820491979620574custom 53279634653425381353custom 54383260473323910673

16 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC153 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nemesis_booksPhoto

🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Миранда Эдвардс ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🪷🪷🪷Я всегда ходила на 🪷🪷🪷грани и делала все, чтобы удержать нашу семью на плаву. Я защищала нас, пока в нашей жизни не появились братья Кинг. Росс Кинг — мой будущий отчим. Жестокий король, держащий за горло политиков и бизнесменов. Он убийца и монстр. Его руки по локти пропитаны кровью врагов, а ноги утопают в их телах. Николас Кинг — наследный принц

custom 53840820491979620576custom 53279634653425381353custom 54519952317234700132

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mirandaedwards. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,154,898 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Миранда Эдвардс | Автор” (@mirandaedwards), 504 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mirandaedwards.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.