Channel

MIPT CTF

@miptctf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

387subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003794222661
Type	Channel
Username	@miptctf
Created	Between 1 February 2026 and 14 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	14 August 2026
Measurements held	3
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/miptctf

Growth

3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 387–388 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
14 Aug 2026, 00:35	387	-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:02	388	no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:17	388	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

253 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	98	38.7%
🔥	52	20.6%
❤‍🔥	47	18.6%
😁	9	3.56%
👍	6	2.37%
🤝	5	1.98%
🤡	5	1.98%
🥰	5	1.98%
😈	4	1.58%
🤔	4	1.58%
👌	3	1.19%
👎	3	1.19%
💩	3	1.19%
😭	3	1.19%
😢	2	0.791%
🫡	2	0.791%
😴	1	0.395%
🙏	1	0.395%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 253reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 8 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Apr 2026, 05:03 UTC≈1,040 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Photo

Вот и всё, финал. Три дня назад прошли финалы MIPT CTF — результаты вы можете видеть на скриншоте. Поздравляем команды cR4.sh, Drovosec и DUCKERZ! Публикуем разбор по финалам, а также репозиторий с полным сетапом и тасками. Также напоминаем, что у нас есть свой канал, посвящённый CTF на Физтехе: @miptlovectf. Иногда между щитпостом там даже мелькает что-то полезное. На этом MIPT CTF совершенно точно подошёл к кон…

❤25👎1

Signed Андрей Рыжов

20 Mar 2026, 20:00 UTC≈1,070 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Возвращаемся с последними новостями по квалам. Во-первых, результаты на скриншоте выше — финальные, и все 10 команд приглашены в финал. Во-вторых, наконец-то появился постмортем: https://telegra.ph/Postmortem-MIPT-CTF-Quals-2026-03-20 Самое время узнать, как поломали борду и почему всё легло в 4 утра. Наконец, мы чуть не забыли про ещё одного нашего партнёра: CyberWave — это growing cyber training platform, и они …

❤12🔥6💩3👎1

Signed Андрей Рыжов

15 Mar 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,130 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Конечно же мы не забыли сделать то, ради чего вообще проводили CTF Скорборд загружен на ctfime, и вы можете написать нам там все, что думаете

❤4🔥2👎1

Signed s41nt0l3xus

15 Mar 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,510 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

А вот и долгожданные райтапы. 🌟 https://github.com/notdenied/miptctf_2026 Мы решили открыть репозиторий с тасками и инфраструктурой как есть — с исходниками и всей историей изменений. На большую часть тасок там уже есть решения, а остальные же, скорее всего, скоро появятся. Можно также попробовать спросить у авторов тасок в лс, если чего-то не хватает. По поводу технических шоколадок, что были на соревновании, пос…

❤19

Signed Андрей Рыжов

15 Mar 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,000 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Photo

MIPT CTF В С Ё! 😁 Спасибо за участие! Было по крайней мере весело. В ближайшее время вернёмся с новостями о командах, которые пройдут в финал. Просьба к капитанам из топ-15 поставить Telegram в поле "сайт" в профиле и написать мне @notdenied в лс свою команду.

❤‍🔥18❤4

Signed Андрей Рыжов

15 Mar 2026, 07:46 UTC730 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На борде внезапно появилась ещё одна таска — feedback. Будем рады, если вы поделитесь впечатлениями, что у нас получилось здорово, а что не очень. 👀 UPD: формочка на фидбек переехала сюда: https://forms.yandex.ru/cloud/69b65ed3d046885c38406c33

🥰5

Signed Андрей Рыжов

15 Mar 2026, 05:22 UTC680 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Доброе утро, всё поднято. Пишите в чат, если будут проблемы.

🤝5❤3

Signed Андрей Рыжов

15 Mar 2026, 01:16 UTC728 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Из-за технических шоколадок борда вместе с тасками, доступными только через инстансер, ушла на перекур... К сожалению в данный момент вернуть её оттуда мы не в силах и можем предложить вам порешать таски, доступные без борды в нашем боте @miptctf_bot Мы попытаемся вернуть все в строй как можно быстрее Также возможно по результатам этой паузы рассмотрим вариант продления CTFа

❤3🤡1😴1

Signed s41nt0l3xus

14 Mar 2026, 21:47 UTC712 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Последний веб также пал — Drovosec успешно фбшнули original_task. Без решений остаётся только таска merzost.

❤4

Signed Андрей Рыжов

14 Mar 2026, 21:30 UTC687 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Штош, последний бастион бинарной эксплуатации пал Поздравляем команду Chelobit'evo с успешным погружением в Undefined Behavior C++ Паба в таске cppub

🔥10

Signed s41nt0l3xus

14 Mar 2026, 21:21 UTC664 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Совсем забыли сообщить Сетап таски babbabboon был исправлен и теперь после решения можно спокойно забрать флаг Эксплуатация никак не изменилась, но желающие могут ознакомиться с изменённым сетапом, выкачав обновлённый архив с таской

❤4

Signed s41nt0l3xus

14 Mar 2026, 21:00 UTC635 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Photo

Прошли первые напряженные 12 часов соревнования... Вот так сейчас выглядит топ. Пожалуйста, продублируйте, если у вас что-то не работает. Со стороны оргов всё хорошо. :)

❤4🫡2

Signed Андрей Рыжов

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @miptctf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 544,731 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

MIPT Love DTF
@miptlovectf · 3181 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

MIPT Love DTF
@miptlovectf · 3181 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

MIPT Love DTF
@miptlovectf · 3181 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MIPT CTF” (@miptctf), 387 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miptctf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.