Channel
@minus99crypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
379subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001257074282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @minus99crypto |
| Created | 29 June 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/minus99crypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 379 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 379 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 29 June 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Создал чат, в котором вы сможете задавать ваши вопросы по возврату либо по другим вопросам. https://t.me/+sUJRAAbJPMExZWFi Залетай по ссылке. Скоро там будет очень мгого людей, которые как и ты хотят вернуть потерянные деньги.
Те, кто выбрал 1 вариант, вы реально верите в это? 😱 Вы в курсе сколько монет осталось на кошельках разработчиков и топ лидеров? При малейшей попытке поднятия курса они укатают курс на прежние значения и будут ждать новой попытки. Вариант номер 3. Уважаемые, вы серьёзно? С вас уже поимели деньги на этих монетах, и вы до сих пор верите в чудо? В лучшем случае курс останется прежним, в худшем укатают еще сильнее. Ва…
Какой вариант возврата средств, из предложенных ниже, для вас самый лучший?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Для тех, кто остался) Есть у меня план, как вам вернуть хотя бы часть потерянных денег. Я не буду обещать вам рост курса одной из монет, так как сам понимаю, что это практически нереально. Я не про заявления и жалобы, с целью найти и наказать виновного в этом крипто фиаско. Судьба сама его накажет или уже наказала. Могу сказать одно, те, кто самые первые заполнят заявку на возврат средств, начнут первыми их получ…
Где сейчас зарабатываешь?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
-99% годовых pinned «На чем потерял деньги?»
Кому не нужна помощь, и он доволен тем, что с него «поимели» в этих проектах, может отписаться. Остальные давайте объединяться.
Зачем я всё это затеял? Я знаю, что тут очень много людей из двух клубов. ISP и … Название второго угадаете сами?) Но я пишу к вам, не чтобы посмеяться над вами, или лишний раз надавить на «больное место». Буду пытаться помочь тем, кто потерял свои кровные в этих проектах. Финансово, морально. Как получится. Зачем мне это? Плюсик к карме получить.
На чем потерял деньги?
The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @minus99crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой вариант возврата средств, из предложенных ниже, для вас самый лучший?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Где сейчас зарабатываешь?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
На чем потерял деньги?
The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2021 to 6 December 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,360,350 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“-99% годовых” (@minus99crypto), 379 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minus99crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.