Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Михаил Минт

@mintering

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,162subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001611739050
TypeChannel
Username@mintering
Created8 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mintering

Growth

3,1623,1723,1676 August 2026 — 3,172 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,172 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,171 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,168 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,162 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,161–3,174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:273,162-6
9 Aug 2026, 11:053,168-3
6 Aug 2026, 06:303,171-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:503,172no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:223,172first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.8%
avg views ÷ 3,162 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,180
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.319%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (14 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total41,349
Reactions total132
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5843.9%
👍4534.1%
2317.4%
💯53.79%
🤔10.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈6,930 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В комментариях написали, что БКС уже есть API (а я пропустил). Потребовались 17 минут, чтобы функционал появился на сайте. Вот, что творит коллаборация человека и ИИ. Ещё из интересного, что лично мне как пользователю-инвестору нравится: ИИ анализирует популярные акции, их отчеты, новости, СД, СА, статистику, прогнозы и даёт своё мнение. Пример: https://investmint.ru/phor/ Раздел Мнение ИИ А в ИИ-сводка по вашему

👍4

3 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈9,860 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дивидендный гэп: посчитал, за сколько он реально закрывается «Ну недели за две» гуляет по чатам с 2017 года, а проверить никто не удосужился. Взял 1988 дивидендных выплат по 194 акциям Мосбиржи с 2012 года и посчитал. • Половина гэпов закрывается за 9 торговых дней. 28,2% вообще в тот же день • А 7,3% выплат не закрыты до сих пор. Рекордсмен висит третий год • Голубые фишки не быстрее: 61,9% за месяц против 62,1% у

👍7🔥5

1 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC362 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Данные Инвестминт теперь можно забирать к себе Дивиденды, купоны, консенсус аналитиков, календарь событий: всё это у нас уже разобрано, и мы отдаём это потоком прямо в вашу систему. Ленту раскрытий больше не придётся разбирать руками. Отмечаете, что нужно, и называете свою цену. Весь пакет целиком брать необязательно: возьмёте один срез, посчитаем один срез. В заявке три поля, минута дела. https://investmint.ru/bu

👍1

23 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC650 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Альфа-Банк Т-инвестиции БКС ВТБ Финам Сбер добавлены 😉

🔥5👍21

23 Jul 2026, 06:08 UTC622 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Решил потестить kimi 3, делюсь инвайтом. На сегодняшний день лучшая модель в мире. Думаю, что рано или поздно Клод начнёт банить тех, кто обходит блокировки (или нет). Нужен запасной аэродром.

👍21🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC563 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Делаю импорт брокерских отчётов в Инвестминт Загружаете файл, сервис сам понимает, какой это брокер, и достаёт позиции: тикер, количество, среднюю цену. Вбивать портфель руками больше не нужно. Альфу уже научил. Теперь нужна ваша помощь: пришлите на hello@investmint.ru отчёт вашего брокера. Т-Банк, Сбер, ВТБ, БКС, Финам, кто угодно. Лучше XML или Excel из личного кабинета, за любой период, где были сделки. Чей отч

👍51🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 06:55 UTC511 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Написал свой чат-движок вместо Jivo и Chatwoot Надоело, что чат-виджет тянет мегабайты чужого кода на каждой странице моих сайтов. Сделал свой. Весит целиком 13.6 KB против ~431 KB у Jivo, в 32 раза легче. Внутри 7 155 строк кода, один процесс на 94 MB и файл базы на 5 MB вместо "4 GB RAM + Postgres + Redis" у Chatwoot. Три месяца обкатываю на своих сайтах. 546 диалогов, AI закрывает примерно 4 из 5 вопросов сам.

🔥6👍21

20 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC463 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Обожаю новое будущее с ИИ, сделали с Клод MCP по поиску авиабилетов за пару минут, потому что надоело перебирать даты, смотреть варианты. Написал запрос человеческим языком, и он всё сам проверил и прислал итог. Кстати, в Кисловодске самое вкусное мясо, которое я ел и молочный коктейль как в детстве, густой и очень вкусный. Вспоминаю как с родителями ходили на Москвский проспект в какую-то булочную и там такой пил

🔥52👍2

20 Jul 2026, 12:30 UTC395 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ещё одна история, куда двигаемся с партнёром по недвижимости. Выходим на рынок, где у ребят 500 млн - 5 млрд ежегодной выручки. Вообщем, полез я в конкуренцию с крупными игроками. Проверим, сможет ли небольшая группа людей + сотни ИИ агентов отхватить кусочек рынка ;-)

🔥3👍21

19 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC399 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Француз поднял $3,5 млн на скучную идею На днях наткнулся: французский предприниматель собрал в Дубае ИИ-компанию под простую модель. Заходят в крупный бизнес, берут самый дорогой процесс, перестраивают его на агентский ИИ и получают долю от доказанной экономии. Клиент не выиграл, они не заработали. Мне это близко, потому что у себя я так живу уже давно: 10+ сервисов на 16 серверах веду в одиночку, вместо штата раб

1👍1🔥1

18 Jul 2026, 05:51 UTC400 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Любопытное противостояние США и Китая в сфере ИИ

👍2🔥2🤔1

17 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC447 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кстати, одна из причин, почему я взялся за сервис для чатов. У всех сейчас жопа в бизнесе. Ставки, биржа падает, всё дорожает. Слушаю знакомых предпринимателей: все просто пашут, у каждого свои сложности. И я подумал, что могу попробовать помочь малому бизнесу. Сократить расходы, поднять качество. Сервис для сайтов и мессенджеров, где клиент через ИИ бронирует услугу. Автоматизация рутины малого бизнеса, в общем.

🔥3👍21

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mintering. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 7,808 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Михаил Минт” (@mintering), 3,162 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mintering.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.