💡 Что-то рисуется.. 💡
custom 545442067276997774212custom 54541724064803997517custom 54676262240313975643❤1

Channel
@mintcottage
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
114subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002442858752 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mintcottage |
| Description | Тут поговорим о личном, посмотрим на закулисье, о чем-то посмеёмся 🌟 ♥️ Заказать мерч можно здесь: https://vk.ru/mintcottage ♥️ По личным вопросам: t.me/meitenshi |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mintcottage |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 114 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 114 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (12 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,179 |
| Reactions total | 274 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
379 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 115 | 30.3% | |
| custom 5454420672769977742 | 87 | 23.0% | |
| custom 5467626224031397564 | 76 | 20.1% | |
| custom 5454172406480399751 | 32 | 8.44% | |
| custom 5454113157406550393 | 25 | 6.60% | |
| custom 5470125504155642422 | 17 | 4.49% | |
| custom 5474546395597795514 | 16 | 4.22% | |
| custom 5454300778757910545 | 11 | 2.90% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 379reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💡 Что-то рисуется.. 💡
custom 545442067276997774212custom 54541724064803997517custom 54676262240313975643❤1
Картиночка новой микро-открытки-закладки, которая уже в печати 😺 🌸 Всем любителям коллажей и дневников~
❤12custom 54544206727699777424custom 54676262240313975643
Всё, написала, что съезжаю с призрачной полки... (не плакать не плакать не плакать)
custom 545417240648039975121custom 54701255041556424221
Размышляю есть ли смысл сидеть на призрачной полке, если за прошедшие два месяца я не окупила даже аренду одного? Не идёт у меня с загородными полками что-то совсем, ну про призрачную ещё могу понять, новинок почти не отправляла и оформления нет + фандомы отсутствуют пока 😭 но в Омской-то полке это никак не мешает продажам..старые позиции тоже разбирают! А прошлые опыты с иногородними полочками тоже были подобными :…
custom 547454639559779551416❤4custom 54541724064803997512
💗❇️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩❗❇️💗 как Омск, но побовше! хорошая погода, вкусная еда, покупки - как же хорошо отдыхать! Завтра поедем кататься на теплоходе, а потом в академгородок и на водохранилище!! 🌸надеюсь получится заскочить на Лисью полку~
❤14custom 54676262240313975645custom 54701255041556424224
Забыла добавить, марки будут не просто на виниловой пленка, а на виниловой пленке с САХАРНОЙ ламинацией, емае 🤩
custom 545442067276997774215custom 54701255041556424225❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 546762622403139756414custom 54544206727699777428❤4custom 54541724064803997512
🤩🤩🤩 💡 Завтра занесу мерчик в омскую полочку и во вторник поеду в небольшой отпуск!! 🤍😺 Как всегда, занесу гачи и марки, нового пока у меня ничего нет, жду допечатки брелков и стикеров с типографий, активно (насколько это возможно) делаю оформление иииии буду готовиться к маркету, который будет в августе! Скоро сделаю анонс!! ❇️🧡❇️
❤14custom 54544206727699777425custom 54676262240313975645
Сегодня увиделись с Танюшей, принесла мне чудеса с Москвы 🤩😱 И ночной рисунок в процессе ДИЛЮК НЕОЖИДАННО ДАА А ВОТ НЕ СКАЖУ ЧТО ЭТО БУДЕТ это секретный проект по геншину в планах на 2026 был хехеех 🌟🍃💚Пытаюсь учиться рисовать как раньше, без затыков, что все должно быть обязательно в одном стиле... 🤓 Да и вообще рисовать и заканчивать то, что начала... Кстати, вчерашнее аниме это "Волчица и пряности", добро пожал…
custom 546762622403139756415custom 545442067276997774210❤4
💡💛буп!💛💡 (угадаете, какое аниме смотрю? 🤩)
❤18custom 54544206727699777426custom 54676262240313975646
🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩Заказала печать марочек на сахарной плёнке...эра матовой ламинации заканчивается, похоже, теперь только сахар?... 🌼💡 Очень нравится то, что под сахаром цвета такие яркие, сочные, а под матовой ламинацией темнее (но это конкретно в моей типографии, я сейчас тоже делаю значки дома и понимаю, что от плёнки зависит ужас как много...), к тому же, сахар так славно нарядно блестит, а по устойчивости к внешни…
custom 545442067276997774216❤7custom 54676262240313975647
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 545411315740655039316custom 54676262240313975647custom 54544206727699777426custom 54543007787579105452
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mintcottage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,140,026 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“мятный домик” (@mintcottage), 114 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mintcottage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.