Channel
@minre_wa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
834subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 17 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001466941135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @minre_wa |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/minre_wa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 834 | +3 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 831 | no change |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 831 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 April 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 855 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
208 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 146 | 70.2% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 11.1% | |
| 👌 | 18 | 8.65% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 7.69% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 2.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @minre_wa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 April 2026 to 5 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
(از شهروند تا فالوئر؛ استحالهٔ انسان سیاسی در عصر اینفلوئنسرها) زمانی انسان برای آنکه شهروند باشد، باید میاندیشید؛ امروز کافی است دیده شود. این شاید یکی از عجیبترین دگرگونیهای سیاست در عصر شبکههای اجتماعی باشد: انسانی که تا دیروز صرفاً مصرفکنندهٔ تصویر بود، امروز خود به تولیدکنندهٔ تصویر، روایت و حقیقت سیاسی تبدیل شده است. تعداد دنبالکنندگان، به شکلی خاموش، در حال تبدیل شدن به نوعی سرمایهٔ سیاسی است؛ گویی میلی…
❤2👍1👏1
در اینجا دیگر مسئله فقط این نیست که فرد چه میگوید؛ مهمتر آن است که چه کسی میگوید. تصویر، لباس، سبک سخن گفتن، زندگی شخصی، روابط، سفرها، حتی حالات چهره و واکنشهای روزمره، همگی میتوانند بخشی از یک برند سیاسی شوند. سیاست از این طریق، آرامآرام از عرصهٔ ایدهها به عرصهٔ شخصیتها مهاجرت میکند. در چنین شرایطی، ممکن است فرد نه به خاطر یک برنامهٔ سیاسی مشخص، بلکه به دلیل احساس نزدیکی، جذابیت، اعتماد یا حتی شیفتگی نسبت ب…
❤4👍1👏1
در اینجا پوپولیسم دیجیتال با کیش شخصیت به یکدیگر میرسند: اگر سیاست به داستان تبدیل شود، رهبر باید قهرمان داستان باشد. او باید نجاتدهنده باشد. باید در برابر دشمن بایستد. باید همیشه حق داشته باشد. و اگر اشتباه کرد، پیروانش باید بتوانند اشتباه او را توجیه کنند. از اینجا، رابطهٔ سیاسی به رابطهای تقریباً ایمانی نزدیک میشود. فوکو و قدرتی که دیگر چهرهٔ قدرت ندارد فوکو به ما کمک میکند بفهمیم قدرت فقط در دولت، پلیس، زن…
❤6👍1👏1
"تراژدی سیاست کوتاه" یکی از بزرگترین دشمنان سیاست امروز شاید «کوتاهبودن» باشد. کوتاه شدن ویدئو. کوتاه شدن جمله. کوتاه شدن حافظه. کوتاه شدن توجه. کوتاه شدن تحلیل. اما تاریخ کوتاه نیست. اقتصاد کوتاه نیست. فرهنگ کوتاه نیست. ملتها کوتاه نیستند. و ساختن یک نظام سیاسی با یک ویدئوی یکدقیقهای ممکن نیست. سیاست واقعی پر از چیزهای خستهکننده است. مذاکره. شکست. سازش. مطالعه. برنامهریزی. نهادسازی. انتظار. و گاهی تصمیمهایی …
❤6👏2👌1
با امپراتوری ایران، نخستین گام را به پهنهی تاریخ پیوسته میگذاریم، ایرانیان نخستین قدم تاریخی هستند. از ایران است که نخستبار، آن فروغی که خود میدرخشد و پیرامونش را روشن میکند، سر برمیزند. عقل در تاریخ- فریدریش هگل- #بنیامین_دیلم_کتولی https://t.me/minre_wa
❤7👎2
به همین دلیل، اهمیت تاریخی داریوش را باید در مفهوم «مهندسی سیاسی» فهمید. او عناصر مختلف قدرت را به یکدیگر متصل کرد: مالیات، بوروکراسی، ارتش، ارتباطات، راه، پول، معماری و روایت سیاسی. این عناصر به صورت جداگانه چیز کاملاً جدیدی نبودند؛ اما ترکیب آنها در مقیاس شاهنشاهی، نظامی ایجاد کرد که توانست قلمروی بسیار گسترده و متنوع را برای نسلهای بعدی قابل اداره نگه دارد. شاهنشاهی هخامنشی البته هرگز یک «ماشین خودکار» نبود. شورش…
❤8
سکهی دریک و نظام اوزان و مقادیر نیز در همین زمینه اهمیت پیدا میکنند. نظام پولی هخامنشی به توسعهی تجارت و گردش اقتصادی کمک کرد، هرچند نباید تصور کرد که کل اقتصاد امپراتوری صرفاً بر یک پول واحد استوار شده بود. تجارت در امپراتوری همچنان از انواع مختلف پول، کالا و سازوکارهای مبادله استفاده میکرد. در نتیجه، اهمیت اقتصادی داریوش را باید نه در «اختراع اقتصاد پولی»، بلکه در قابلاندازهگیریتر شدن منابع قدرت شاهنشاهی جست…
❤6
"داریوش بزرگ و مهندسی شاهنشاهی: از قدرت شخصی تا معماری یک امپراتوری" در تاریخ امپراتوریها، فتح سرزمینها دشوار است؛ اما دشوارتر از فتح، ادارهکردن سرزمینهای فتحشده است. بسیاری از فرمانروایان توانستند قلمروهایی عظیم ایجاد کنند، اما تعداد اندکی موفق شدند میان فاصلههای جغرافیایی، تفاوتهای قومی، تنوع اقتصادی و منافع سیاسیِ گاه متعارض، نوعی نظم پایدار ایجاد کنند. اهمیت داریوش یکم را دقیقاً باید در همین نقطه جستوجو …
❤4👎2
"تحقیر قدرت؛ فلسفهی شکستن هیبت استبداد" قدرت سیاسی پیش از آنکه با اسلحه حکومت کند، با تصویرِ قدرت حکومت میکند. استبداد تنها از نیروی سرکوب تغذیه نمیکند؛ از این باور نیز نیرو میگیرد که شکستناپذیر است، همهجا حاضر است و هیچکس توان ایستادن در برابر آن را ندارد. از این منظر، شکستن روحیهی نیروهای یک نظام صرفاً یک تاکتیک روانی نیست؛ میتواند نوعی شکستن اسطورهی قدرت باشد. هر قدرتی برای تداوم خود نیازمند هالهای از …
❤4👍3👌2👏2
▪️سیستم ژاپنی برای ترک هر عادت بدی- فلسفه
❤9
قهرمان کیست؟ از بهشت رانده شده ای ،است که عزم بازگشت به بهشت را دارد. قهرمان آن انسان فرهیخته ای است که قدم در راه تغییر وضعیت موجود مینهد او به تمام سختیها و ناکامیها نبردها و دیوها فریبها و رنج و تنهایی که در پیش روی اوست آگاه است اما ماندن در وضعیت فعلی را برای ،خود غیر ممکن میداند او پا در سفری روحانی و درونی می گذارد، با همهی مشکلات رو در رو و پنجه در پنجه در می آویزد و نهایتا سربلند و آزاده وارد عالمی جدید می…
❤5
آیا مفهوم زندگی این بود که آدم شاهد رجالهبازی یک دسته مادرقحبه بشود؟ نامهی صادق هدایت به حسن شهیدنورایی #بنیامین_دیلم_کتولی https://t.me/minre_wa
❤13👌1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @minre_wa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Minrewa” (@minre_wa), 834 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minre_wa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.