Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Телега мини биттерГиггла

Channel

Телега мини биттерГиггла

@minnibittergiggle

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

95subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002810030401
TypeChannel
Username@minnibittergiggle
DescriptionПриветствую тебя на моём канале , здесь будут публиковаться новости и теории по гобб ,ютуб канал : https://m.youtube.com/@миниБиттерГиггл ( Если что мой ос это плюшевая игрушка биттерГиггла )
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/minnibittergiggle

Growth

949594.57 August 2026 — 94 subscribers8 August 2026 — 95 subscribers9 August 2026 — 95 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 94–95 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 12:3295no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:0195+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:3994first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.5%
avg views ÷ 95 subscribers
Avg views / post
60.3
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held17 (4 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,025
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
586
Videos
66
Links
136

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
44s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2870.0%
custom 5217482217701281298615.0%
custom 5231310869933104123615.0%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.88%
1 of 17 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
49.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
60.0
over 16 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC38 viewsread 9 August 2026

Для тех кто не может посмотреть в Ютубе,я выпустил видос в ВК видео (А ещё кто то перезаливает видосы шайки в вк видео😭) https://vkvideo.ru/video-231718869_456239022 #канал

8 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC49 viewsread 9 August 2026
Advertisement

У моего друга Ещкереки вышло новое видео с разбором тизера гобб9,советую посмотреть пока ждёте мой разбор😉 https://youtu.be/rGwh8Qo_GrE?si=7zELP8ee8NUD9T-U #реклама

8 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC64 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

yLokz поделился черновой анимацией тизера гобб9 (Он сделал анимации для тизера,и для скримера опилы в обнове гобб1) #гобб9

8 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC41 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Kapisnimaetfignu

ООООО НАС ЧТО 50 ВСЕМ СПАСИБО ОЧЕНЬ ВСЕМ БЛАГОДАРЕН

3

8 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC33 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @plantsproutlive

https://huggywug.co/4z3nA3E

7 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC59 viewsread 9 August 2026

Видос переносится,на ещё одну неделю 😭 #канал

7 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC60 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Какое превью лучше?

  1. Первое30%
  2. Второе70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC58 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

На следующей неделе #канал #спойлер

custom 52174822177012812985

7 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC134 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ВИДОС ВЫШЕЛ #канал https://youtu.be/QgEX-3c3a70?si=lVQQxFFhFxxbr1WJ

custom 523131086993310412361

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @minnibittergiggle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

Какое превью лучше?

  1. Первое30%
  2. Второе70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Телега мини биттерГиггла” (@minnibittergiggle), 95 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minnibittergiggle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.