〰️ВАЖНО〰️ Следующую неделю я, скорее всего, буду без связи 🤩 Так что если у вас есть ко мне вопросики или вы хотите вписаться в очередь заказиков - нужно действовать сейчас! 🤩 Можно писать сразу сюда @nikar_kai
custom 547008073771150291110🫡1

Channel
@mini_bro_shop
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
522subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002306157989 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mini_bro_shop |
| Description | Достаю ваших любимок из мониторов и превращаю в мягеньких мини бро ฅ^>⩊<^ฅ Заказать своего малявку можно, написав мне @nikar_kai ) 💙✨ У меня дома живёт котик, аллергики, будьте аккуратны! 🌱 🔹 Пост с инфой 🔹 https://t.me/mini_bro_shop/125 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mini_bro_shop |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 522 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 522 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (15 July 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,638 |
| Reactions total | 193 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
193 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5470080737711502911 | 55 | 28.5% | |
| custom 5220161491314958667 | 32 | 16.6% | |
| custom 5235589164166032324 | 23 | 11.9% | |
| 💘 | 23 | 11.9% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 9.33% | |
| custom 5220106983885002341 | 15 | 7.77% | |
| custom 5224427772524376976 | 14 | 7.25% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 3.63% | |
| custom 5219714655802381430 | 3 | 1.55% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.04% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.518% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
〰️ВАЖНО〰️ Следующую неделю я, скорее всего, буду без связи 🤩 Так что если у вас есть ко мне вопросики или вы хотите вписаться в очередь заказиков - нужно действовать сейчас! 🤩 Можно писать сразу сюда @nikar_kai
custom 547008073771150291110🫡1
Никакой информационной нагрузки, просто послушайте, как звенят их бубенчики 😠😠🪅
custom 523558916416603232414💘6custom 52201069838850023412
Да, я 🤩
Такую подборочку ВК собрали с будущими авторами третьего Клубничного🍓⭐ Скажите же - прелесть!! Кого из авторов узнали?
custom 522010698388500234113💘2
Приз уже у победителя! 🤩 И вот какой милый отзыв мне оставили 🥰💖 Очень рада, что дракончик попал в такие заботливые ручки 🤩 Кстати, Хаку уже можно найти в ассортименте и заказать всем желающим ❤️✨
custom 522016149131495866715💘1custom 54700807377115029111
Давненько я вам не показывала индивидуальные заказики 🤩 Тут сразу комплектик персонажей: Фиона и Кейк 🤝🤩 Сама с удовольствием посмотрела 2 сезона этого мульта, пока их вязала 🤗 Они делались на подарок, и отзыв уже можно посмотреть здесь *тык* Невероятно приятно, что мои плюшики вызывают такие положительные эмоции! Слушала голосовое (в лс) и как будто это мне подарочек сделали 🥰💜
custom 547008073771150291120💘6🔥6❤5custom 52355891641660323243
Уже разложились! 🤩🤩🤩 📌 Москва, ТЦ Нора, Андропова 22, столик 13
custom 547008073771150291113custom 52201614913149586673
Ура!! Кому-то сегодня повезло 🤗🎉 А кто-то копит заряд удачи на следующий раз! 🙂🤩 Всем победителям обязательно напишем в лс за уточнением деталей доставочки 🐈⬛ А пока что вот вам экспресс показ вязанок для маркета КОНСОЛЬ, который будет уже завтра! 🤭 Если что, у меня 13 столик (да, счастливый), вас там встретит моя коллега 🤩 PS: можно купить туда билетик со скидкой, промокод - Мини бро 👻
🔥10💘3custom 52244277725243769762
🎉 Розыгрыш завершен! 🏆 Победители: 1. @l1sitskaya 2. @BjUM25 3. @RussichkaJM 🔍 Проверить результаты
custom 54700807377115029116😭2💘1
Показываю вам Хаку поближе и напоминаю, что уже завтра подведём итоги розыгрыша и узнаем, кто же заберёт его к себе 🥰🥰🥰
custom 522442777252437697612custom 54700807377115029115custom 52355891641660323244❤2💘2🔥2custom 52201614913149586671
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠❗️❗️ Мини бро становится всё лучше! 🤩 Я поняла, что это дело не просто хобби, а настоящий волшебный огонёк в ночи для моей души 👻 (именно в это время и рождается большинство работ) Я буду делать его свет ещё ярче и делиться им с вами, мои мотылёчки! 🤩🏺 Раньше и подумать не могла, что буду таким заниматься, и что, оказывается, в наше время для всего этого есть возможности! Так что сейчас я всё ещё в начал…
custom 522016149131495866713custom 52197146558023814303💘2custom 52355891641660323242
Channel name was changed to «Мини бро | Авторские игрушки»
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mini_bro_shop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 240,382 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mini_bro_shop named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мини бро | Авторские игрушки” (@mini_bro_shop), 522 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mini_bro_shop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.