Channel

NFT 明芳名房

@mingfang_bot

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002418622040
Type	Channel
Usernames	@mingfang @mingfang_bot
Created	13 April 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	14 August 2026
Last confirmed live	14 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/mingfang_bot

Growth

2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
14 Aug 2026, 00:18	2	no change
12 Aug 2026, 04:30	2	first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 13 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share	Share, drawn
❤	1	100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2025 to 10 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 366,992 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 44 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

NFT @rangtian 让天让舔
@rangtianbot · 22 posts @biangye 𰻝爷
@biangyebot · 21 post NFT @chunduo 春朵
@chunduo · 21 post @chunqin 纯琴春琴
@chunqin8 · 91 post NFT @dongwa 冬娃
@dongwa8 · 31 post NFT @haoman 豪曼
@haoman · 31 post NFT @hucui 胡翠
@hucui · 31 post NFT @laiqiao 赖巧来巧
@laiqiao · 21 post @liepo 烈婆猎婆
@liepobot · 21 post NFT @mannu 曼奴
@mannuuuuuuuuu · 391 post NFT @mengzuan 萌钻猛赚
@mengzuanbot · 21 post @pangn 胖妞
@pangniu8 · 21 post NFT @piaoa 飘啊
@piaoaaaa · 31 post NFT @piaorun 飘润
@piaorunbot · 21 post NFT @piaoshou 嫖首
@piaoshou · 21 post @piaoshuang 嫖双飘霜嫖爽
@piaoshuang · 31 post 骠信飘心嫖新
@piaoxinbot · 21 post NFT @pintian 品田品甜
@pintian · 21 post NFT @pianv 片v 皮娅女
@piyanv_bot · 21 post 巧彤。 @qiaotong
@qiaotong_bot · 21 post NFT @qiaya 恰雅
@qiayabot · 31 post NFT @qingguai 晴乖情怪
@qingguai · 41 post NFT @rerui 若蕊
@rerui1 · 21 post @zhuozong 卓总
@zhuoyeye · 21 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

@chunqin 纯琴春琴
@chunqin8 · 91 post @diaye 嗲爷
@diaye · 31 post NFT @dongwa 冬娃
@dongwa8 · 31 post NFT @duopei 朵佩多陪
@duopeibot · 21 post NFT @fantao 范涛番桃
@fantao · 21 post NFT @haoman 豪曼
@haoman · 31 post NFT @heqiao 何巧
@heqiao1 · 21 post NFT @mannu 曼奴
@mannuuuuuuuuu · 391 post NFT @mengya 萌芽梦雅
@mengya8 · 41 post NFT @mengzuan 萌钻猛赚
@mengzuanbot · 21 post NFT @miaolan 妙兰
@miaolan_bot · 21 post NFT @panniu 潘妞盘牛
@panniu_bot · 21 post NFT @piaomo 嫖摸
@piaomo · 21 post NFT @piaoruo 飘若
@piaoruobot · 21 post NFT @piaoshou 嫖首
@piaoshou · 21 post 巧彤。 @qiaotong
@qiaotong_bot · 21 post NFT @qiaya 恰雅
@qiayabot · 31 post NFT @qingguai 晴乖情怪
@qingguai · 41 post NFT @rangtian 让天让舔
@rangtianbot · 21 post NFT @rerui 若蕊
@rerui1 · 21 post NFT @shengluo 圣罗
@shengluobot · 21 post NFT @shuangpiao 双嫖爽嫖
@shuangpiaobot · 21 post NFT 舒脆舒翠
@shucuiBOT · 21 post 兑币+玄月
@yuyuqionglou · 121 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NFT 明芳名房” (@mingfang_bot), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mingfang_bot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.

NFT 明芳 名房