Channel
@mindmaxon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
392subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002274749573 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mindmaxon |
| Description | Добро пожаловать в дневник скальпинга, боли и мемов. Прогрессы и регрессы по трансформации личности тоже будут. Меня зовут Макс O_o Для сотрудничества: andrmaxon@gmail.com Канал на YouTube: @MindMaxON Запрещёнграм: @mindmaxon |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mindmaxon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 392 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:29 | 392 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
68 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 22.1% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 19.1% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 13.2% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 7.35% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩 Пропал знатно, знаю 404 🤩 Но пора вам поведать — куда исчез, почему молчал и чем таким секретным занимался.🪖 Рынок в последние месяцы был максимально недружелюбный. Я пробовал всё: менял стратегии, пересматривал риск-менеджмент, углублялся в анализ…⛏ Но каждый раз наступал момент, когда включалась та самая лудка. Вы, скорее всего, знакомы с этим сценарием: «ну сейчас точно отобьюсь, ещё один вход». Не отбивался.…
🔥3🏆2👌1
🎁 Встречайте скидки -55% НА ВСЕ ПРОДУКТЫ в DIGASH 🛍 Мы редко делаем такие скидки, но сейчас решили открыть доступ к нашим продуктам по минимальной цене 👀 Внутри DIGASH: • Продвинутый скринер • Поиск лучших формаций по стратегиям • ИИ-помощник для анализа сетапов • Продвинутые уведомления для мониторинг рынка 24/7 💰 Если давно хотел начать — сейчас лучший момент ❗️ Акция действует с 18 до 24 мая (включительно) ❗️ …
❤3👍3🔥2
Video, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
#RAVE 🎶 Matadora, matadora —— MC (248M RAVE): • 2.5B at $10 • 3B at $12 • 4B at $16 • 5B at $20 —— RU | BigLiquid | Pro Channel
❤2🥰1
⚡️⚡️USDT рухнул на 90% на фоне ареста основателя Tether Крейга Селлерса. Листинг монеты на биржах временно не доступен. Читаем настоящую причину👇 Сердце стукнуло? С 1 апреля.
🍾4🤡2🤯2🤔1
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰2
🚬 а вот теперь на подумать
🟥Решил я значит спросить, что об этом всём думают медийные трейдеры/ скальперы/ бизнесмены/ плейбои/ филантропы. А именно: Ruslan Danilov, TemScalp, RdnScalp, Дмитрий Цветков, Mark Severin, и один анонимный гость. И ответы все смонтировал в отдельное видео, так что бегом все смотреть и рассуждать в комментариях📱 https://youtu.be/D3MgDKT7rTE https://youtu.be/D3MgDKT7rTE https://youtu.be/D3MgDKT7rTE
❤🔥3
💀 🇷🇺#крипто #регулирование #россия Законопроект о регулировании криптовалют в России может быть внесен в Госдуму на следующей неделе. Он предполагает, что все привычные способы торговли USDT или биткойном — через криптобиржи или обменники — будут запрещены. Вместо этого рядовым инвесторам разрешат торговать в российском контуре под надзором российского ЦБ не более чем на 300 000 рублей в год. А тех, кто против, жде…
😮💨😮💨😮💨
Video message, posted without a caption
🤣5❤2🏆2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mindmaxon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 539,614 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MindMax - Трейдинг” (@mindmaxon), 392 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mindmaxon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.