Channel
@mindgummm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
159subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001652801231 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mindgummm |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mindgummm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 159 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 159 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 16 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
78 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5429137488788599758 | 48 | 61.5% | |
| custom 5235791281032016070 | 9 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5273863554770942382 | 9 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5249238411318941633 | 7 | 8.97% | |
| custom 5312016238887590940 | 5 | 6.41% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Такой вот обнаружен трогательный сайт , где люди пишут важным людям что-то, что не успели или не сумели сказать лично. Несказанные слова порой самые сильные. Они никогда не заканчиваются и продолжают жить внутри бессрочно. Письмо - чудесный способ освободить и прожить невыраженное. Зачиталась ❤️🩹
custom 52738635547709423829custom 52357912810320160703
Спасибо, что пользуетесь - @SaveAsBot'ом
custom 52492384113189416337custom 53120162388875909403
Я в восторге))
custom 52357912810320160702
Ну-с, в целом, похоже))
Нашла я, значит, тут бот, который анализирует и прожаривает тг каналы. Не смогла пройти мимо. Правда там будто не столько канал, сколько меня как личность очень точно прожарили😪 (Если вы тоже забыли о существовании этого канала, 0 осуждения. После прочитанного в прожарке, я б ваще отписалась)) У меня активирован избегающий стиль ведения канала. Оказывается не писала сюда почти полгода. И кажись, соскучилась) 📊 Р…
custom 54291374887885997585custom 52357912810320160704custom 53120162388875909402
«Принимая решение в пользу стабильности, мы по сути выбираем свое неизменное прошлое. В результате меньше тревожимся, но при этом ощущаем вину за нереализованные возможности. Выбирая неопределенное будущее, мы всегда делаем шаг в сторону личностного развития: больше доверяем себе, смотрим на мир оптимистично, живем осмысленной жизнью, но в то же время... обрекаем себя на постоянное переживание тревоги. Это та цена, …
custom 542913748878859975815
Так и живём 🤓
custom 542913748878859975816
Чаще всего поиск толчка к действию и к принятию того или иного решения заключается в думах о том, что мы получим в результате этого действия. Однако, как показывает практика, это часто не является окончательным стимулом и цена приобретения может быть недостаточна для того, чтобы побудить к действию и переменам. Зачастую куда эффективнее оказываются вопросы: «что будет, если я это НЕ сделаю?» или «чего НЕ будет, если …
custom 54291374887885997585
File, posted without a caption
custom 54291374887885997581
«Вера в важность собственного Я - главный источник страдания» Чем больше вы переживаете о себе, тем больше вы переживаете о себе
custom 54291374887885997586
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mindgummm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 949,658 of 1,481,277entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“oh mind gum🪴” (@mindgummm), 159 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mindgummm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.