Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mindfocus.me - психология жизнелюбия

Channel

Mindfocus.me - психология жизнелюбия

@mindfocusme

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,732subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001176370846
TypeChannel
Username@mindfocusme
DescriptionЭкзистенциально-аналитический психолог. Инициирую в устойчивость, жизнелюбие, доброту, аутентичность и чувство собственного достоинства. Помогаю взрослеть. - Курсы и лекции 👇 taplink.cc/mindfocus.me
Created26 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mindfocusme

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,70414,76614,7356 August 2026 — 14,741 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,739 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,737 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,739 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,740 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,731 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,725 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,722 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,720 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,713 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,709 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,711 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,717 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,720 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,722 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,721 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,712 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,714 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,717 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,714 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,715 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,711 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,709 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,708 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,704 subscribers7 September 2026 — 14,717 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,736 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,734 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,738 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,737 subscribers30 September 2026 — 14,732 subscribers5 October 2026 — 14,764 subscribers10 October 2026 — 14,754 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,766 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,761 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,755 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,749 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,746 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,748 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,749 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,750 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,749 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,744 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,738 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,733 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,727 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,731 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,729 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,727 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,724 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,722 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,725 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,723 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,722 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,726 subscribers8 November 2026 — 14,732 subscribers9 November 2026 — 14,731 subscribers11 November 2026 — 14,732 subscribers14,7326 August 202611 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 97 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,695–14,775 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 07:0414,732+1
9 Nov 2026, 16:0114,731-1
8 Nov 2026, 06:2814,732+6
7 Nov 2026, 01:2914,726+4
6 Nov 2026, 03:0014,722-1
4 Nov 2026, 23:3914,723-2
3 Nov 2026, 22:3614,725+3
2 Nov 2026, 00:4614,722-2
1 Nov 2026, 00:2914,724-3
31 Oct 2026, 02:4814,727-2
30 Oct 2026, 05:2614,729-2
29 Oct 2026, 03:0714,731+4
28 Oct 2026, 00:5814,727-6
27 Oct 2026, 03:5614,733-5
26 Oct 2026, 06:2714,738-6
25 Oct 2026, 08:3714,744-5
24 Oct 2026, 08:5814,749-1
22 Oct 2026, 12:4014,750+1
21 Oct 2026, 05:2814,749+1
20 Oct 2026, 00:0614,748first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 14,732 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,900
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held44 (1 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total28,460
Reactions total1,878
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 19:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈13,900
Videos
≈190
Links
≈994

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 20s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,918 reactions across 42 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,93666.5%
❤‍🔥72312.2%
🔥59410.0%
💯1352.28%
😁1252.11%
💔981.66%
🙏881.49%
🥰751.27%
👏360.608%
👍310.524%
😍250.422%
😢160.27%
🦄100.169%
😭90.152%
💘40.068%
🤗40.068%
🤯30.051%
🤔20.034%
🥱20.034%
✍10.017%
1 further kind10.017%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,918 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC≈1,440 views284 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

❤️

❤160💔76🙏19❤‍🔥16😢9👍2🤔2

9 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,770 views151 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁117❤12👍12💯10

8 Nov 2026, 12:34 UTC≈1,990 views84 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

maghrebmind.com За всеми подробностями и наличием мест на семинары, пишите @on_a_road_again

🔥40❤26❤‍🔥8😁8🥰2

8 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,620 views113 reactionsread 12 November 2026

В Марокко два сезона - лето и зима. Зимой температура опускается ночью до 10-13 градусов, днем сохраняется в районе 16-20. Световой день держится в пределах 9 часов. Бывают дожди, но большинство дней - по-прежнему солнечные. Моя зимняя активность - это запастись травками, специями и медом. Готовить теплые блюда и разнообразные аюрведические чаи. Экспериментировать с соусами. Гулять по горам и океанскому побережью с …

❤75🔥29❤‍🔥9

8 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,480 views110 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Как я провожу зимы в Марокко

❤68❤‍🔥17🔥17😍8

7 Nov 2026, 11:38 UTC≈1,630 views94 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤63🔥23❤‍🔥7💘1

7 Nov 2026, 11:38 UTC≈1,030 views49 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Все курсы и занятия - mindfocus.me Приятной субботы ❤️

❤29🔥18❤‍🔥2

2 Nov 2026, 11:29 UTC≈1,860 views183 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

A цитата встретилась мне в фильме «Треугольник печали». Фильм сам по себе отлично иллюстрирует то, о чем я написала😉 ——- Разбор фильма будет на этой неделе в киноклубе. А еще у меня есть занятия про Ценности и Ресурсы, если хочется больше разобраться в теме. Все здесь mindfocus.me ✨

❤117🔥34❤‍🔥24🙏5👍3

1 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTC≈1,810 viewsread 7 November 2026
Poll

А вы как думаете- деньги портят людей?

  1. Да, особенно если еще и власть13%
  2. Нет, вообще никак не влияют3%
  3. Только очень большие деньги5%
  4. Это зависит не от денег, а от человека74%
  5. Затрудняюсь провести связь между деньгами и характером11%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTC≈1,980 views59 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Киноклуб https://mindfocus.me/kino/ 🍿

❤48🔥11

30 Oct 2026, 12:38 UTC≈2,020 views90 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Киноклуб - https://mindfocus.me/kino/ 🎬🍿

❤61🔥26🥰3

29 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC≈2,420 views70 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Вот этим всем мы занимаемся на женском семинаре. У меня уже был один прошлой весной. И это было трогательно и потрясающе. Следующий в марте 2027 года ожидает быть не менее глубоким, нежным и наполняющим. Есть еще места Подробную программу ищите на maghrebmind.com По всем вопросам Насте @on_a_road_again

🔥32❤29❤‍🔥7💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @mindfocusme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTCAnonymous Poll579 voters

А вы как думаете- деньги портят людей?

  1. Да, особенно если еще и власть13%
  2. Нет, вообще никак не влияют3%
  3. Только очень большие деньги5%
  4. Это зависит не от денег, а от человека74%
  5. Затрудняюсь провести связь между деньгами и характером11%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Sept 2026, 08:35 UTCAnonymous Poll636 voters

Как ваше состояние?

  1. Благоприятный период !22%
  2. Кризис в острой форме16%
  3. Кризис вялотекущий39%
  4. Как-то не могу определить, то так, то так22%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Mindspa | Самопомощь
@mindspa_ru · 35,038
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Детский психолог Света Гончарова 🇺🇦🇨🇦
@sve_flymama · 42,585
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mindfocus.me - психология жизнелюбия” (@mindfocusme), 14,732 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mindfocusme.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.