2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 09:02
26
no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:15
26
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
250.5%
avg views ÷ 26 subscribers
Avg views / post
65.1
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (20 June 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
456
Reactions total
42
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
14
Links
1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
99 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
70
70.7%
👍
18
18.2%
👎
5
5.05%
🔥
3
3.03%
👌
2
2.02%
✍
1
1.01%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#تفکر
گاهی یک الگوی مشترک آرام آرام خودش را نشان میدهد.
توی سخنرانی زندهای که تو دانشگاه شهید بهشتی با حضور کاتالین کاریکو (برنده نوبل فیزیولوژی یا پزشکی ۲۰۲۳) داشتیم، کاریکو به نکتهای اشاره کرد که در زندگی بسیاری از افراد اثرگذار دیده میشه:
میگفت که بار بخاطر کار کردن روی پروژه هایی که سال هاست نتیجه نداده مسخره شدم و حتی "احمق" خطاب شدم. اما میگفت من عاشق بودن توی lab و کار کردن بودم. میگه اینا برام مهم نبود من…
#کتاب
بهترین راه برای چند برابر کردن نتایجتان این است که خود را سر سخت ترین رقیب خود بدانید؛
هنگامی که به نقطه محدودیت میرسید، بالا و بالاتر بروید.
📚atomic habits
#تفکر
همه از یک خط شروع نمیکنند؛ بعضیها برای رسیدن به همان نقطه، باید چند برابر بیشتر تلاش کنند!
در سرزمینی که ناعدالتی، هم از درون میجوشد و هم از بیرون تحمیل میشود، چگونه میتوان حق خود را از دنیا ستاند؟
آری، شاید تو بدیهیات فردی در کشور دیگر را نداشته باشی، شاید روزانه با حتی ۴ پارت قطعی برق مواجه شوی، شاید حتی گاهی آب هم نباشد،
یا حتی گرانی های بیش از حد، و بی شمار مثالی که روزانه با آنها روبرویی،
ولی چه باید…
#نقل_قول
«اگر به گذشتهٔ خود بنگرید و نگویید که "ای وای، یک سال پیش چقدر احمق بودم"، پس حتماً در طول سال گذشته بهاندازهٔ کافی یاد نگرفتهاید.»
✍ری دالیو
شب بخیر✨🌒
#کتاب
📕غلبه استبداد داخلی در آفریقای جنوبی نسبت به استعمار اروپاییان!!
استعمار اروپا بدون تردید یکی از تاریکترین فصلهای تاریخ آفریقاست؛ اما آیا تمام رنجهای این قاره را میتوان با آن توضیح داد؟
در حال مطالعه کتاب why the nations failبه نکتهای برخوردم که کمتر درباره آن صحبت میشود...
📌سال ها پس از برده داری گسترده در آفریقا و فروش برده به بریتانیا، قانونی در بریتانیا تصویب شد که تجارت انسان طبق ان ممنوع شد.
در نت…
#تفکر
❓من چگونه تعریف میشوم؟
"هویت"
کلمه ای ساده اما عمیق...
چه چیزی هویت یک انسان را میسازد؟ چه چیزی باعث میشود یک "من" ساخته شود؟
شاید آنچه ما را تعریف میکند، جایی دور از نامها و عنوانها قرار گرفته باشد.
هویت در فرایندی ساده اما مهم شکل میگیرد:
📌کارهای کوچک و انتخاب هایی که در شرایط سخت، زمان های خستگی و بی حوصلگی انجام میدهیم
چیزی که یک انسان رو میسازه، تعهدی است که همواره بهش پایبنده،
حتی وقتی حوصله انجام…
#تفکر
هزینه انتخاب ها
از دست دادن یا بدست آوردن؟
تاحالا شده بعد یه انتخاب سخت، همش شرایطو با گزینه های دیگه که داشتی مقایسه کنی و احساس پشیمونی یا حسرت کنی؟
یا تحت شرایط سخت، همش فکر کنی اگه یه انتخاب دیگه داشتم چی؟
اصلا درست انتخاب کردم؟
🖋معمولا ما بعد انتخاب هامون دچار مقایسه راهی که انتخاب کردیم با گزینه های دیگه میشیم، و هرچی انتخاب بزرگتر؛ وسواس مقایسه هم بیشتر!
📌ولی نکته ای هست که بهش بی توجهیم:
زندگی یعنی از…
#کتاب
📌وجه تمایز روز های مفید و غیر مفید زندگی ما همان انتخاب های موثری است که در لحظه های حساس انجام میدهیم.
همین لحظه های حساس هستند که به "من" آینده شما قدرت انتخاب کردن میدهند.
📚atomic habits
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mindflowr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 854,688 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑴𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒇𝒍𝒐𝒘” (@mindflowr), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mindflowr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.