Bored, Lonely, Angry, Stupid: Changing Feelings about Technology, from the Telegraph to Twitter Harvard University Press, 2019 🧠 @MindandMedia
❤2

Channel
@mindandmedia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
29subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001628812062 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mindandmedia |
| Description | Mind and Media Studies Community @BrainStormStudio |
| Created | 9 December 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mindandmedia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 29 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 29 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 9 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 82.4% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2022 to 16 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bored, Lonely, Angry, Stupid: Changing Feelings about Technology, from the Telegraph to Twitter Harvard University Press, 2019 🧠 @MindandMedia
❤2
🔵 هَـمایـه دوم: تجربهنگاری "از رادیو تا پادکست" با حضور سیاوش صفاریانپور برنامهساز رادیو و تلویزیون پادکستر 💻 لینک ثبتنام: 🔗 evand.com/events/hamaayeh 🗓️ سهشنبه ۲۵ بهمن 🕑 از ساعت ۱۶:۰۰ تا ۱۷:۳۰ 📍 دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران 📲 @hamaayeh
🔥2
📺 مردم افسرده یه راه فرار میخوان 🎦 The Morning Show Series مردم این روزها همه اخبار رو تو دست خودشون دارن و جوری دریافتش میکنن که میخوان جوری رنگش میکنن که میخوان و اخبار افتضاحه ولی بشریت بهش معتاد شده و کل دنیا رو ناراحت میکنه برای همین چیزی که الآن تو تلویزیون میخواد اخبار یا خبرنگاری کوفتی نیست سرگرمی میخواد دقیقا مثل دوران افسردگی 🧠 @MindandMedia
👍6👎1
🗞 اما روزنامه نگاری ... ما اخبار رو دنبال نمیکنیم! ما اخبار رو به وجود میاریم!!! 🎦 The Loudest Voice Series کلی آدم اون بیرون هستن که نمیدونن چی رو باور کنن اینقدر درگیر رسانههای لیبرال شدن که حتی نمیدونن که آدم خوبها چه کسانی هستن حالا اگه به این مردم بگی چه فکری کنن، از دستشون میدی! اما اگه بهشون بگی چه حسی داشته باشن؛ اونا رو مال خودت کردی! 🧠 @MindandMedia
👍10
بخشی از محاکمه #آدولف_آیشمن گزیدهای از فیلم #هانا_آرنت (۲۰۱۲) دادگاه: اگر اراده ملی قویتری وجود داشت این شرایط میتونست تغییر بکنه این دست تقدیر نبود چیزی که داشت اتفاق میافتاد مربوط به رفتارهای خود انسانها بود آیشمن: ولی باید این رو هم در نظر بگیریم که جنگ بود و جو طوری پیش رفته بود که همه میگفتن: "مقاومت بیفایده ست" این کار قطرهای بود در برابر یک اقیانوس نه نتیجهای داشت و نه تاثیری در روندی که داشت طی م…
👍7
Channel photo updated
Channel photo removed
Digital Memory Studies: Media Pasts in Transition Digital media, networks and archives reimagine and revitalize individual, social and cultural memory but they also ensnare it, bringing it under new forms of control. Understanding these paradoxical conditions of remembering and forgetting through today's technologies needs bold interdisciplinary interventions. Digital Memory Studiesseizes this challenge and pioneer…
👍5❤1
Digital Memory Studies: Media Pasts in Transition Author: Andrew Hoskins Publisher: Routledge Year: 2017 @MindandMedia
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mindandmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 965,676 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mind & Media” (@mindandmedia), 29 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mindandmedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.