Channel
@mind_scent
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002283876618 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mind_scent |
| Description | Привет, я Веста и я парфувлечённая из Литвы 👋🏼 Парфюмерные якоря, рассуждения и заметки 🤌🏼 #ПарфБлог Сэмплы #Парфсписки |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mind_scent |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 24 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 24 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (2 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 412 |
| Reactions total | 78 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
78 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 71 | 91.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.85% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Понедельник 😬 Чтож, понедельник такой понедельник! 😵💫 Меня атаковал насморк, на пару дней отключили горячую воду иии всё, что я хочу - это бокальчик шампанского и круглосуточные просмотры "Секс в большом городе" 🤧💁🏼♀️ Тесты парфюма откладываются пока нос не вернётся обратно в норму ✍🏼
👍3😢1
Суббота 😵💫 Сегодня я без тестов, осталась с дочкой дома, а мужа напшикала древним сэмплом Diptyque Eau de Minthé и отправила по делам. И вы знаете, этот аромат каааак задиффузил, муж ушёл, а аромат остался во всех двух комнатах + коридор! 😱 Ароматных выходных! 🤌🏼
❤4
Итого: я счатлива быть знакома с этим ароматом. Да, я ожидала большего, особенно после интригующего комментария... нооо, он действительно прекрасен! Думаю его время года не лето, чёт мне кажется ему пошла бы осень/зима. 🔊 Диффузный и шлейфовый. ⏳ Стойкость 8+ (и явно способен больше). 🤝🏻 Рекомендую, но если не делать на него ставку, что это "Creme de la creme" среди парфюмерии, особенно среди сладких, ванильных, сли…
❤5
Filippo Sorcinelli Panna Sotto 🤭 •Со старта, помимо схожести с Comme des Garcons Concrete, я слышу цитрусовость, но такую, словно прохладную. •На 5 минуте заметила мёд и некую кислинку, но не ссанину медовую. Уводит в детсво к смородине, к соку, который на кухне в жару дед гнал стоя у плиты и вокруг пчёлы, что аж страшно зайти на кухню. •Через час каких-то значительных изменений не заметила. •Перед выходом на улицу …
❤4
Пятница 👯🏼♀️ Ну чтож, сегодня погода уже адекватнее после ночной грозы, так что входим в пятничный ритм с Filippo Sorcinelli Panna Sotto 🤭 С блоттера он для меня звучал как младший брат CdG Concrete 🤌🏼и на коже со старта тоже он😐😂 Таки с кожи слышу цитрусовость но такую прохладную, очень интересно звучит 🤔 Вечерком как обычно напишу подробнее ✍🏼
❤4
Таки сегодня без тестов, но зато я в Birkholz Tales Of Torino 🤌🏼 Балдю 😻
❤3🔥1
Нанесла на запястье Racyne Garden Song иии как ни крути, но Фужеры это не моё направление 😄 при всём уважении, но я просто физически не могу пахнуть геранью и базиликом 😬 Его из тестов вычеркиваю ✍🏼
❤3
Четверг🌡️ Чем орошаетесь в жару? Делитесь! У меня по плану продолжить тест ароматов из последнего заказа, но и среди них выбрать трудновато 😂🤔
❤3
Итого: я в восторге! Прекрасный аромат с вайбом Саншайн, в меру сладкий, с приятным инжиром и фиником. Не яркий, но очень удобный, мягкий аромат. 🔊 Не сильно шлейфовый и абсолютно не диффузный. ⏳Стойкость часов 5 на сегодняшний день. 🤝🏻 Рекомендую, добрый, женственный аромат. 💃🏼 Я бы в нём хоть куда да и в любую погоду, когда просто хочется пахнуть хорошо для себя.
❤5
Neydo Blond Redhead 16.11 🧘🏼♀️ •Со старта какой он добрый! Знаете, реально как будто нанесла двоюродного братишку Саншайн! (Amouage Sunshine Woman) Белый табак - именно он искрит на моей коже 💥 Изначально вообще показался персик, но он быстро сменился на белый табак, который абсолютно не покидает мою кожу всё это время (минут 5-7). •Через 15мин инжир показался, редкий гость для моего носа! И цветы, фрезию очень люб…
❤4
Mind_scent pinned a photo
Увидела, что теперь можно подписываться во Фрагрантике 😍 Сможем стать парфюмерно ещё ближе 🤭 •Ссылка на мой профиль cru.de.lis
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mind_scent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 93,717 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mind_scent” (@mind_scent), 24 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mind_scent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.