Channel
@alapsh8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
245subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002152195487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alapsh8 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alapsh8 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 245 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 247 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 243 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 244 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (4 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,340 |
| Reactions total | 174 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
174 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 149 | 85.6% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 4.60% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 4.60% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 4.02% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Аромат №8: арабские тропики 🌴 Сегодня выхожу пораньше, потому что абстрагироваться от конкретного аромата у меня не входит. Из однозначного: считаю, что это арабская парфюмерия на тему тропиков. Цитрусовая верхушка, тропическое сердце, ванильная база. По текстуре кремовый 🧴 Основные аккорды: сладкий, ванильный, кокосовый, тропический. Ноты: 🍊 Цитрусы, ревень — за очень кислючий цитрусовый старт. 🥥 Ананас, кокос,…
❤4
Доброе утро и комфортной вам всем недели 🍭 Рискну сразу поделиться первой ассоциацией по 8-ке — Qaed Al Fursan Unlimited Lattafa Perfumes. Попробую абстрагироваться, но будет непросто 😅 Какое у вас настроение в этот понедельник, выбрали под него аромат?)
❤7
Аромат №7: перчёные тропики? У меня с этим ароматом сегодня в голове каша абсолютная: будто чёрным перцем посыпают напиток «Мажитэль» и кладут на шершавую деревяшку. А уходит всё в крем 🧴 Основные аккорды: древесный, мускусный, кокосовый, сладкий, фруктовый, пряный. Ноты: 🍹Ананас, кокос, гуава — за тропический блок. 🌚 Чёрный перец, кашемировое дерево, кашмеран — за перчёную древесную шероховатость. 🧴 Сандал, ила…
❤7
С колой на море, или 40 Knots Xerjoff. Сейчас поясню за странный коллаж. Это всё один и тот же аромат, просто контрастное поведение в зависимости от степени нагрева моей кожи за одно знакомство: Максимально разгоретая = сладкая кола, роза и хвоя🥤🌹🌲 Остывшая и прохладная = солёная морская деревяшка 🧂 🌊 🪵 Многоликая работа с прекрасными техническими характеристикам и удивительными метаморфозами! И я бы точно с пр…
❤13
Доброе утро ✨ Я в аромате под номером 7. Пока неведомый совершено, надеюсь разобраться к вечеру 🤞 Какие у вас парфюмерные планы на сегодняшнее воскресенье?)
❤7
Аромат №6: Шоколад и прополис. У меня сегодня много параллелей с человеческим миром. Помимо родственников, которые вспомнили конфеты «Буревестник» (шоколадные конфеты с молочной начинкой), во время носки ещё мерещились горький шоколад с апельсином, кофейные зёрна и настойка прополиса. Такая чуть смолистая, медовая история. Но всё это довольно гармонично собрано в одну цельную парфюмерную композицию. Основные аккор…
❤7
Доброе утро ✨ Мои миллениалы сравнили 6-ку с конфетами «Буревестник». Я их не помню, но шоколад планирую упоминать вечером точно 🍫 Как ваша суббота, уже выбрали для неё аромат?)
❤10😁5
Аромат №5: кого сожгли? Ох, от души меня сегодня продымили и прокоптили. Если Наташа когда-нибудь ходила в таком на школьное собрание, её там должны были запомнить 💯 Для меня 5-ка в первую очередь про дым и брутальность, без сантиментов совершенно🔥 Основные аккорды: дымный, кожаный, удовый, амбровый. Ноты: 🔥 Дым, УД, ладан, гваяк — здесь определённо что-то жгут. Деревяшки или даже мусорку. 🦮 Кожа, пачули, берёз…
❤6🔥4
Metal Lavender Matiere Premiere Больших надежд на эту новинку не питала. Но раз появилась возможность познакомиться, почему бы и нет? Сразу хочется провести небольшой отсев: 1) Амброценид. Всех чувствительных предупредила, здесь немного, но есть. 2) Aftershave. Есть момент мужской пены для бритья, но со временем. 3) Металл. Холодный, а местами даже стоматологический, поэтому такие ассоциации здесь вполне реальны…
❤7🎉2
Всем мощный привет 🔥 А я то думала, когда уже жесть начнётся 😂😂😂😂 Все 4 предыдущие это просто милые цветочки на фоне 5-го аромата. Ещё поди разберись: это гудрон, бензин или пожар? Мне уже хочется винить УД во всех бедах, но оставлю на вечер) Какой у вас сегодня будет аромат утра/дня/вечера?)
❤9😁3
Аромат №4: молодой, но с ретринкой. Мне кажется, что это современный аромат с налётом ретро. Потому что на старте он одновременно старо-мыльный и горько-пудровый. Но далее успокаивается, становится всё телеснее и будуарнее. Основные аккорды: мускусный, альдегидный, белые цветы, цитрусовый. Ноты: 🍋 Бергамот, цветок апельсина, нероли— за горькие и немного мыльные цитрусы. Альдегиды — на старте даже хозяйственное мы…
❤5👍2
Ждёте эту новинку? Cedrus de Nuit Chloé Я то прониклась в этом году к Chloé, поэтому просто закрою глаза на Квентина Биша и устремлю взор на Луизу Тёрнер с ванилью 🤞 Шучу! Хочу попробовать 💯
❤6👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @alapsh8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 91,512 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ALAPSH” (@alapsh8), 245 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alapsh8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.