File, posted without a caption
❤8🥰1

Channel
@mind_body_alchemy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
65subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001269876866 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mind_body_alchemy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mind_body_alchemy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 65 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 64 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 65 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 65 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 6 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
60 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 78.3% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 6.67% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 6.67% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2025 to 29 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mind_body_alchemy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 June 2025 to 29 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
File, posted without a caption
❤8🥰1
Приветствую всех! Возвращаюсь к вам с подарком! В аудио рассказала о том: - с какими запросами чаще всего ко мне обращаются прекрасные и удивительные женщины - о гайде, который мне захотелось написать для вас на этот счет🙂 Гайд написан в виде чек-листа, это напоминание и направление для вашего движения в сторону приумножения здоровья и гармонии в жизни. 7 элементов вдохновлены исследованиями голубых зон долгожител…
❤7🥰2
Как мы превратили стресс в стиль жизни (и причем тут я) Кажется, сегодня стало нормально жить в постоянном напряжении. Мы смотрим новости, чужие истории, гонку “успешности” и говорим себе: ну конечно, в таких обстоятельствах невозможно быть спокойным. Мы нормализовали стресс!! Сделали его частью культуры, как будто это естественная плата за движение вперёд, за амбиции, за жизнь. Но хронический стресс истощает, выжи…
❤8❤🔥2
Сегодня на сессии с клиенткой говорили о том, как принимать решения уверенно. А через час — читаю книгу и натыкаюсь на свои же мысли 🙃 ✨ Насколько легче мне стало жить, когда я начала принимать решения не перегретым умом, а интуицией. Бесконечный анализ, сомнения, плюсы-минусы сменились внутренней тишиной. В которой стало возможным услышать интуитивное знание. Это тихий голос, мягкое внутреннее ощущение, которое не…
❤12🔥4
Сейчас я купила себе на пробу корейский крем, тоже оксид цинка, мне понравилось, что в составе достойные уходовые ингредиенты и он практически вообще НЕ БЕЛИТ. Я не фанат корейской косметики, состав не 100% идеальный, есть немного силиконов, но в целом хорош.
❤8
Перейдем к физическим фильтрам. Я скрупулезно изучала этот вопрос, когда появились исследования о вреде наночастиц диоксида титана в SPF и минеральной косметике. Но сейчас большинство адекватных брендов перестали использовать наночастицы, о чем прямо пишут на упаковке. ❗️Известно, что диоксид титана при купании в бассейнах реагирует с хлором и утрачивает свои солнцезащитные свойства. ✅Для своей семьи я выбираю средс…
❤3🥰1
☀️ SPF - тема действительно противоречивая, поделюсь своим мнением. ❗️Помимо SPF, обязательно должна быть защита от УФА - лучей, вызывающих фотостарение. Ищите индексы PA и PPD. Чем больше плюсов стоит рядом с PA (от + до ++++) и выше цифра у PPD (от 2 до 16+), тем лучше защита. Если таких букв нет, ищите надпись UVA в кружке. По SPF. Есть два типа солнечных фильтров: Физические (оксид цинка и диоксид титана) образ…
❤1👍1🤔1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mind_body_alchemy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧬Активация • Lisa Guliants” (@mind_body_alchemy), 65 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mind_body_alchemy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.