Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

мятный чай

@minchiart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

55subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003092695911
TypeChannel
Username@minchiart
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/minchiart

Growth

5355546 August 2026 — 53 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53 subscribers13 August 2026 — 55 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53–55 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:5655+2
10 Aug 2026, 09:1653no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:0053first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
193.6%
avg views ÷ 55 subscribers
Avg views / post
107
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held14 (23 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,491
Reactions total87
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3641.4%
🥰3439.1%
🔥1213.8%
❤‍🔥55.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC24 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Спасибо за участие в челлендже! Ючи распределяются следующим образом: 1-ый юч достался участнику под номером 2 (@vestalspirit) 2-ой юч достался участнику под номером 1 (@qewe15) 3-ый юч достался 3-ему участнику (@kururika)! Жду вас в личке канала или у меня, чтобы обсудить кого вам нарисовать 🥰💖

🥰9

8 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC26 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я долго думала как хочу поступить с лотерей для тех, кто успел в дедлайн, если участников будет мало… Делать ли лотерею на 3-ёх человек или просто нарисовать всем подарочки? 😙 Но у меня тут завалялось как раз три юча без дела, которые я давно хочу отрисовать! Предлагаю разыграть их между тремя участниками! Так каждый получит рисунок, но мне будет проще, потому что я не буду рисовать три картинки с нуля… Что думаете?

9

7 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC33 viewsread 10 August 2026

Смотрите какая ещё одна великолепная работа!!!

7 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC20 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @kururika_nikkiPhoto

спустя сто тыщ лет наконец-то собралась поучаствовать в #dtiys от @minchiart!🐾 это персонажи ее будущей книжки, очень милые ведьмочка Мэри и ее фамильяр🐾 #marysilverdtiysforminchi #рисунки #фанарт

🥰113

7 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC37 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Сегодня последний день для тех, кто хочет попасть в лотерею! На данным момент вас всего двое 🌚 И спасибо вам, что вы есть 💖

🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC39 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

На челлендж (в рамках лотереи) осталось 2 дня, а у нас такое красивое пополнение!! До 7 августа включительно можно выложить свою работу и получить номерок в комментариях к дтису! Не забываете заглянуть за номерком! Пост в закрепе 🩷

🥰61

5 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC34 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vestalspiritartPhoto

Успела нарисовать до нового дедлайна dtiys, который очень хотелось ☺️ Очень миленькие персонажи, жду их историю! Лоскутное платюшко - просто любовь, хочу себе такое 🤩 Автор оригинала @minchiart 😊 #marysilverdtiysforminchi #dtiys #drawthisinyourstyle

5

4 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC867 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Я не планировала брать коммишки такого типа, но вот уникальная возможность, потому что мне нужна денежка 🌚 Стоимость картинки 2200р. На картинке будет три рисунка в скетч-стиле: чиби, портрет (в формате поларойда, инсты или тт с надписями), полнорост, фон однотонный с символичными миниатюрами, как на примере (цветы, фрукты, предметы). Рисую ваших персонажей и фанарты. Если у персонажа будет много сложн

🔥54

3 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC59 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @yunnuna_artPhoto

И снова открыты комишки-скетчи. Подобного плана (~портрет) 👾 Стоимость: 2000р 👾 Сроки исполнения: до 2 недель 👾 По полной предоплате (Сбер, Т-Банк) (по запросу предоставляю чек!) 👾 Без предварительного согласования скетча 👾 1 персонаж 👾 можно добавить второго персонажа на арт за стоимость х2 ТАК ЖЕ Можно заказать комишки любого плана - вся информация тут, все вопросы в ЛС/комменты 👾 COMMISSION INFO 👾 Пишите в

31 Jul 2026, 22:47 UTC65 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @holivierslandPhoto

Челлендж нарисуй это в своем стиле но у тебя нет стиля погнали А если серьезно, то спасибо минти за движуху! Люблю такие штуки, жаль, свободного времени все меньше. В любом случае старались, потраченного времени не жаль🦅 #marysilverdtiysforminchi

❤‍🔥5🥰3

31 Jul 2026, 22:47 UTC61 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я хотела напомнить про челлендж днём, но работа такая классная, что я на могу ждать и молчать! До 7 августа действует акция лотереи! Я разыграю рисуночек для вас! Буду ждать 💖 Смотрите на эту красоту!

🔥3

29 Jul 2026, 19:49 UTC71 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Последняя атака на артфайт! Не знаю хватит ли мне времени и сил на ещё одну, но… кто знает 🌚 #артфайт #арт #чиби

5🥰5

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @minchiart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 67,389 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“мятный чай” (@minchiart), 55 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minchiart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.