Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мимифэнтези | Наталья Алексина

Channel

Мимифэнтези | Наталья Алексина

@mimifantasy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

177subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001356743968
TypeChannel
Username@mimifantasy
DescriptionКанал автора Натальи Алексной Ромфант и приключения Для связи со мной @NatalyaAleksina
Created6 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mimifantasy

Growth

1777 Aug 2026, 08:33 — 177 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:45 — 177 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:338 Aug 2026, 13:45
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 176–178 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:45177no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:33177first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.9%
avg views ÷ 177 subscribers
Avg views / post
70.6
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (11 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total706
Reactions total94
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
413
Videos
20
Links
173

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

214 reactions across 19 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5726.6%
🔥4219.6%
😁219.81%
👏198.88%
🤣198.88%
😱104.67%
👍73.27%
🎉62.80%
💯62.80%
🤔62.80%
🥰52.34%
👀31.40%
🌚20.935%
👌20.935%
🙈20.935%
🤝20.935%
🤨20.935%
❤‍🔥10.467%
😎10.467%
🤗10.467%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC37 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уже есть несколько прод. И я решила, что буду выкладывать повесть бесплатно в процессе. Продолжение, скорее всего, будет раза три в неделю)

6👍2

Signed Наталья

3 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC62 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Поехали)) "Жизнь с новой строки" Новая жизнь в теле книжного персонажа? Я согласна. Учеба, магия и легкий флирт — то, что нужно. Жаль только, что я главная стерва романа, которую однокурсники обходят по стеночке. А так, конечно, все хорошо. Если я не умру в финале, как предсказывает сюжет.

🔥6🎉4

Signed Наталья

1 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC61 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Встречаемся 3 августа на Литнет)

🔥54👌2🤗1🥰1

Signed Наталья

31 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC76 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не отпускал меня вопрос, почему же Швейцария так поздно дала женщинам право голоса. Когда еще в 1867 году из Цюрихского университета выпустилась первая в Европе доктор медицинских наук и хирургии - Надежда Суслова. Правда, оказалось, дело было не в прогрессивных взглядах. А в том, что высшее образовании в Швейцарии не было популярным. Оно не гарантировало трудоустройства и зарабатка, поэтому швейцарцы предпочитали не

4🔥4🤝2

Signed Наталья

30 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC66 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пишу сестре: " купила штаны-бананы", а она присылает вот это фото)) Теперь, когда смотрю в зеркало, вижу себя так😁

😁11

Signed Наталья

29 Jul 2026, 06:17 UTC77 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Читаем мы с ребенком мировую историю в комиксах. И я уже пару раз говорила про себя:"ниче се". Вот и тут) Никогда бы не подумала так плохо о Швейцарии)) Я понимаю, что важна не только дата, когда разрешили голосовать, но и то как это реализовано по факту. Но все же, но все же.

😱6🤨2👍1🔥1

Signed Наталья

28 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC66 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sakrytinaPhoto

"Ведьма, бубен и шаман" Натальи Алексиной — повесть о том, как ботаник отдал своё сердце, а сюжет ушёл в самоволку. Марк - сухарь, который очень боится ведьм, учится на физика, ни с кем не встречается и старается быть нормальным, хотя его отец шаман, а ведьма живет прямо в соседнем подъезде: Иванна — молодая, красивая, от которой Марк шарахается как от прокаженной. У Иванны всё наоборот: она шарахается от нормальн

5🌚2

Signed Наталья

28 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC65 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А тут пишут хорошее про рассказ "Ведьма, бубен и шаман". Еще немного журят, но мило))

3

Signed Наталья

26 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC80 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"Страж" Алексей Пехов Наверное, любители фэнтези уже считают "Стража" классикой. Но я и книгу и автора для себя открыла относительно недавно. "Страж" это небольшие истории одного героя, которые складываются в сложный мир. Людвиг видит души. И он способен отправить темные из них в ад. Он ходит из города в город, берет заказы и делает мир чуть светлее. Хотя многие истории не имеют счастливого конца. Настроение книг

🔥64👍2

Signed Наталья

22 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC116 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Итак. Литмоб про попадание в книгу стартует 26 июля) Первая - Марина Бастрикова (основательница марафона для читателей "Читунка"), а вторая (27.07) - Виола Редж (она написала "Полторы имперских марки" - детектив в условном австрийско-немецком антураже прошлого;)) А я стартую 3 августа, и выкладывать буду неторопливо. Все это на Литнет.

8🔥2

Signed Наталья

10 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC138 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Попадание в книгу в условный университет + плюс городское фэнтези, все вместе это очень близко к тому, что на сайтах самиздата публикуют в "молодежной прозе". Вот у меня есть герои от ии под этот формат))

6🔥2🥰2😎1

Signed Наталья

9 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC131 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пятый вариант начала рассказа о попадании в книгу вроде ничего. Его оставлю, скорее всего) #творческое

👏5😱4🔥1

Signed Наталья

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mimifantasy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 679,520 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мимифэнтези | Наталья Алексина” (@mimifantasy), 177 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mimifantasy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.