今天就卖到这里了🚀 中午1点左右开课👆🏻

Channel
老公们的爱🏠
@mimi520ai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
77subscribers
+71 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004317439609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mimi520ai |
| Created | 9 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mimi520ai |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 77 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 77 | +71 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 6 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 9 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 299.0%
- avg views ÷ 77 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 230
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.369%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (9 September 2026 – 11 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,453 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 36s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
这是我姐妹 @db520ai 可以一起来深入交流一下双✈️ 有🈳
【嫩妹报告】https://t.me/NNnmmtfzz 【老师艺名】萌萌 【联系方式】 @mimi520aiw 【所在位置】金沙洲 【验证留名】惊 【验证时间】9.11 【修车费用】700p 【颜值身材】9 【服务内容】课表一致 【服务态度】9 【优点缺点】嫩 【推荐程度】9 【体验细节】近日工作烦躁,逛遍飞机,发现新人萌萌便主动出击。按找指示到达地点后,开门进去后看到一个小只妹子,打扮精致可爱,挺高二话不说便敲定,迫不及待赤裸相见,出了浴室,萌萌已经在床上等好了,马上猴跳上床,漫漫便贴上来了,“好温柔”本狼忍不住感慨,舌头很灵动,很快漫漫的头转移下方,温暖,舒服,专心的服侍着二弟,忍不住抚摸曼妙的身躯,很快便忍不住,攻守易型把她压在身下,骤然加速,漫漫的声音忽然大了起来,后面的内容等各位狼友自行脑补想象,愉快离场,等二番战! ♥️温馨提示: 以上仅代表个人体验,报告仅供参考! 👎🏿府上专员严查假报告!写手代谢出门右转! 报…
老公们的爱🏠 pinned «这是我姐妹 @db520ai 可以一起来深入交流一下双✈️»
#联邦报告 <https://telegram.me/gzafua> 【出击留名】:惊 【出击时间】:9/11 【老师艺名】:#萌萌 【联系方式】:@mimi520aiw 【开课位置】:#金沙洲 【上课费用】:700p 【颜值身材】:完美 【身高体重】:167左右 【胸杯紧度】: b 【老师类型】:#嫩 【服务种类】:课表都有 【情绪态度】还可以 【优点缺点】: ①缺点:无 ②优点:嫩,高 【自由描述】:一到老师的房间,我都有点不太好意思,老师长得很漂亮,因为一进门我就和老师拥抱了一下。我和老师说是第一次来的,老师没有嫌弃,她一直教我怎么做,一开始帮我洗澡,然后她让我躺在床上,很温柔,一直帮我放松心情。在帮我👄的时候,简直太爽了,老师帮我戴套。在老师坐下的那一瞬间,感觉老师的里面很温暖,很湿润,紧紧的把我包裹住,看着老师粉嫩的BB,老师一直主动的配合我,一直主动在前后上下摇动,后来慢慢的我也主动了,传教士,老汉推车等等一些都用上…
这是我姐妹 @db520ai 可以一起来深入交流一下双✈️
去你心里的路该怎么走……
开课开课❤️
难道是我不够优秀让你们来爱我吗😭
#联邦报告 <https://telegram.me/gzafua> 【出击留名】:喜 【出击时间】:9/10 【老师艺名】:#萌萌 【联系方式】:@mimi520aiw 【开课位置】:#金沙洲 【上课费用】:700p 【颜值身材】:高,白 【身高体重】:168左右 【胸杯紧度】: b 【老师类型】:#嫩 【服务种类】:可以 【情绪态度】9 【优点缺点】: ①缺点:无 ②优点:对于嫩妹来说的话还是可以的 【自由描述】:有新妹子,还是嫩妹,果断出击!皮肤粉嫩,越看越喜欢那种,说话声音也温柔,很对我胃口,果断交课费!妹妹是有求必应,哥哥想的姿势都配合。我看妹子嫩嫩的,口的也很舒服,都慢慢来,小女友般温柔 妹子也没有催!搞完后心情当然高兴,很有耐心但是又有点不好意思 总的来说,好喜欢,必返食! 报告仅供参考,请理性选择, 哥布林切勿对号入座的 报告提交给👉 莉莉@Gzafua_bot👈
【嫩妹报告】https://t.me/NNnmmtfzz 【老师艺名】萌萌 【联系方式】 @mimi520aiw 【所在位置】金沙洲 【验证留名】RE 【验证时间】9.10 【修车费用】700p 【颜值身材】9 【服务内容】课表一致 【服务态度】热情 【优点缺点】高嫩 【推荐程度】9 【体验细节】有新妹子,还是嫩妹,果断出击!皮肤粉嫩,越看越可爱那种,说话声音也温柔,很对我胃口,果断交课费!妹妹是有求必应,哥哥想的姿势都配合。我看妹子嫩嫩的,口的也很舒服,都慢慢来,小女友般温柔 妹子也没有催!搞完后心情当然高兴,很有耐心但是又有点不好意思 总的来说,好喜欢,必返食! ♥️温馨提示: 以上仅代表个人体验,报告仅供参考! 👎🏿府上专员严查假报告!写手代谢出门右转! 报告提交:@Fndxbgbot
❤1
开课🀄️🀄️🀄️
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mimi520ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“老公们的爱🏠” (@mimi520ai), 77 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mimi520ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.