Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Милорд DevOps

@milordtalks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

179subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001206185582
TypeChannel
Username@milordtalks
DescriptionДля всего чем не жалко поделиться* *Все данные добыты путем исследования открытых источников.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/milordtalks

Growth

1797 Aug 2026, 16:20 — 179 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:16 — 179 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:208 Aug 2026, 13:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 178–180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:16179no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:20179first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 December 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
97.2%
avg views ÷ 179 subscribers
Avg views / post
174
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held20 (27 December 202326 July 2026)
Views total174
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
21
Videos
3
Links
38

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁6041.7%
👍3423.6%
🔥2517.4%
128.33%
🙈106.94%
💩32.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2023 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @milordtalks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 December 2023 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC174 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

И вот опять, пытаемся пережить 2027 (на самом деле уже 2030). Помните AI 2027 — сценарий, в котором ИИ начинает автоматизировать разработку следующих поколений ИИ, после чего прогресс резко ускоряется? Теперь тот же AI Futures Project выпустил AI 2040: Plan A. Это уже не столько прогноз, сколько план действий. Предложение примерно такое: — США и Китай договариваются не превращать создание сверхинтеллекта в гонку

3👍1🔥1🙈1

24 Apr 2026, 15:07 UTC370 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Немного интересных мыслей про AI-стартапы. Когда-нибудь мы начнем делать все умом, а не пытаться забраться на гору хайпа. Рекомендую ознакомиться. https://habr.com/ru/articles/1026726/

🔥5

9 Apr 2026, 21:17 UTC499 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Немного о том, что ждет нас в ближайшем будущем(помимо бесконечного нейрослопа). То о чем мы еще 10 лет назад говорили "нукогдатотам", а безопасники надеялись что это произойдет не на их веку. Возможно еще не пора брать техдолг, но формировать верхнеуровневые планы безусловно стоит. А для инженеров принимать новые стандарты, и начинать изучать так называемую "PQC", она же "постквантовая криптография". В целом первы

3👍3🙈1

27 Mar 2026, 08:28 UTC758 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну очень уж смешная картинка 😂

😁13🔥51

4 Feb 2026, 08:45 UTC625 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Давайте немного подумаем, о том что нас ждёт дальше. Интереснейшая статья на мой взгляд, которая показывает основные проблемы инженера 21 века https://habr.com/ru/articles/991614/

👍5😁1🙈1

22 Dec 2025, 13:58 UTC677 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @perviykanalPhoto

Файлы Эпштейна? Нет, спасибо — тут кто-то ебанутый скачал всю музыку из Spotify и сохранил в торрент файл на почти 300 терабайт! При этом, они еще и провели отличный анализ данных, потому внутри можно увидеть много интересных выводов и графиков 😎

🙈31😁1

21 Nov 2025, 07:36 UTC695 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mxmvshnvsk_storiesPhoto

Вообще за эволюцией этого мема забавно наблюдать)

😁12

25 Aug 2025, 04:08 UTC912 views3 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Все хочется попробовать, нашел крутую статью, оставлю тут пожалуй https://habr.com/ru/articles/938220/

👍2🔥1

23 Jun 2025, 13:26 UTC≈1,030 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Наткнулся на интересную статью Исследую роутеры с «вечным VPN» с российских маркетплейсов Занимательное чтиво, но мне грустно, что это все покупается. На подобном строится бизнес и никто не объясняет людям, что они теряют. Очень надеюсь, что люди далекие от технологий, научатся обсуждать темы связанные с покупкой сомнительных вещей хотя-бы с чатжпт. А пока читаем и наслаждаемся "безопасностью" в чистом виде. Беру

👍4🙈21

15 Jun 2025, 16:57 UTC805 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Итак, пост про языковые модели локально. Давно уже хотел написать, и кажется пора. Саша привет этот пост в том числе для тебя🙂 Для начала моя спецификация, это MacBook Pro на чипе M1Pro и 32 оперативы. ОС Sequoia 15.5. Для начала предлагаю ознакомиться с гайдом Мануал по запуску полной модели DeepSeek-R1 локально и понять, что в целом серьезные языковые модели это уже не так дорого. Цена оборудования примерно 6к$.

🔥4👍3😁1

3 Jun 2025, 11:25 UTC707 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Современные проблемы требуют современных решений. Рекомендую ознакомиться с одним из таких решений. SOSAL пытается заполнить недостающие части мозаики, филигранно вписываясь своими принципами между KISS, AGILE, и прочими титанами ниши 🙂 https://habr.com/ru/articles/914998/

😁11🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @milordtalks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Милорд DevOps” (@milordtalks), 179 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/milordtalks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.